TSTP Solution File: CSR082+6 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : CSR082+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:22 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 27.44s 28.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 27.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   51 (  20 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  114 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  115 (  52   ~;  43   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   3 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;  11 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   54 (   6 sgn  24   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_26636,axiom,
    ! [X1,X15,X13] :
      ( ( s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) )
     => ( ( s__subclass(X1,X15)
          & s__instance(X13,X1) )
       => s__instance(X13,X15) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26636) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_26635,axiom,
    ! [X1,X15] :
      ( s__subclass(X1,X15)
     => ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26635) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_28461,axiom,
    ! [X1034,X1035,X1097] :
      ( ( s__instance(X1097,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X1035,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X1034,s__SetOrClass) )
     => ( ( s__subclass(X1034,X1035)
          & s__subclass(X1035,X1097) )
       => s__subclass(X1034,X1097) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_28461) ).

fof(local_1,axiom,
    s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Human),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_27595,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__SentientAgent,s__Agent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_27595) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_35206,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Human,s__CognitiveAgent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_35206) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_27592,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Agent,s__Object),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_27592) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_27597,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__CognitiveAgent,s__SentientAgent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_27597) ).

fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
    ? [X2341,X2342] :
      ( s__capability(s__Reasoning,X2341,s__Jane8_1)
      & s__capability(s__Perception,X2342,s__Jane8_1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_ALL) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_34434,axiom,
    ! [X20] :
      ( s__instance(X20,s__Object)
     => ( s__instance(X20,s__CognitiveAgent)
       => s__capability(s__Reasoning,s__agent__m,X20) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_34434) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_34807,axiom,
    ! [X20] :
      ( s__instance(X20,s__Object)
     => ( s__instance(X20,s__SentientAgent)
       => s__capability(s__Perception,s__experiencer__m,X20) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_34807) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X16,X17,X18] :
      ( ~ s__instance(X17,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__instance(X16,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__subclass(X16,X17)
      | ~ s__instance(X18,X16)
      | s__instance(X18,X17) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26636])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X16,X17] :
      ( ( s__instance(X16,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__subclass(X16,X17) )
      & ( s__instance(X17,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__subclass(X16,X17) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26635])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X1098,X1099,X1100] :
      ( ~ s__instance(X1100,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__instance(X1099,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__instance(X1098,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__subclass(X1098,X1099)
      | ~ s__subclass(X1099,X1100)
      | s__subclass(X1098,X1100) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_28461])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( s__subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Human),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( s__subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,X3) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_16]),c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    s__subclass(s__SentientAgent,s__Agent),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27595]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( s__instance(s__Jane8_1,X1)
    | ~ s__subclass(s__Human,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Human,s__CognitiveAgent),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_35206]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Agent,s__Object),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27592]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( s__subclass(X1,s__Agent)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,s__SentientAgent) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    s__subclass(s__CognitiveAgent,s__SentientAgent),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27597]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__CognitiveAgent),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( s__subclass(X1,s__Object)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,s__Agent) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    s__subclass(s__CognitiveAgent,s__Agent),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

fof(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X2341,X2342] :
        ( s__capability(s__Reasoning,X2341,s__Jane8_1)
        & s__capability(s__Perception,X2342,s__Jane8_1) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).

fof(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X21] :
      ( ~ s__instance(X21,s__Object)
      | ~ s__instance(X21,s__CognitiveAgent)
      | s__capability(s__Reasoning,s__agent__m,X21) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_34434])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( s__instance(s__Jane8_1,X1)
    | ~ s__subclass(s__CognitiveAgent,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    s__subclass(s__CognitiveAgent,s__Object),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

fof(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2343,X2344] :
      ( ~ s__capability(s__Reasoning,X2343,s__Jane8_1)
      | ~ s__capability(s__Perception,X2344,s__Jane8_1) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_30])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ epred1_0
  <=> ! [X2] : ~ s__capability(s__Reasoning,X2,s__Jane8_1) ),
    introduced(definition) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( s__capability(s__Reasoning,s__agent__m,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__CognitiveAgent)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Object),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

fof(c_0_38,plain,
    ! [X21] :
      ( ~ s__instance(X21,s__Object)
      | ~ s__instance(X21,s__SentientAgent)
      | s__capability(s__Perception,s__experiencer__m,X21) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_34807])]) ).

fof(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ epred2_0
  <=> ! [X1] : ~ s__capability(s__Perception,X1,s__Jane8_1) ),
    introduced(definition) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ s__capability(s__Perception,X1,s__Jane8_1)
    | ~ s__capability(s__Reasoning,X2,s__Jane8_1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred1_0
    | ~ s__capability(s__Reasoning,X1,s__Jane8_1) ),
    inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    s__capability(s__Reasoning,s__agent__m,s__Jane8_1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_27])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( s__capability(s__Perception,s__experiencer__m,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__SentientAgent)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__SentientAgent),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ epred2_0
    | ~ epred1_0 ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_35]),c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    epred1_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred2_0
    | ~ s__capability(s__Perception,X1,s__Jane8_1) ),
    inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    s__capability(s__Perception,s__experiencer__m,s__Jane8_1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_37]),c_0_44])]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    ~ epred2_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46])]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]),c_0_49]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : CSR082+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 09:43:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 27.44/28.63  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 27.44/28.63  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 27.44/28.63  # Preprocessing time       : 0.934 s
% 27.44/28.63  
% 27.44/28.63  # Proof found!
% 27.44/28.63  # SZS status Theorem
% 27.44/28.63  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 27.44/28.63  # Proof object total steps             : 51
% 27.44/28.63  # Proof object clause steps            : 31
% 27.44/28.63  # Proof object formula steps           : 20
% 27.44/28.63  # Proof object conjectures             : 10
% 27.44/28.63  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 7
% 27.44/28.63  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 27.44/28.63  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 14
% 27.44/28.63  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 11
% 27.44/28.63  # Proof object generating inferences   : 13
% 27.44/28.63  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 14
% 27.44/28.63  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 27.44/28.63  # Parsed axioms                        : 55588
% 27.44/28.63  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 55528
% 27.44/28.63  # Initial clauses                      : 87
% 27.44/28.63  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
% 27.44/28.63  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 83
% 27.44/28.63  # Processed clauses                    : 236
% 27.44/28.63  # ...of these trivial                  : 13
% 27.44/28.63  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 27.44/28.63  # ...remaining for further processing  : 223
% 27.44/28.63  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 27.44/28.63  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 27.44/28.63  # Backward-subsumed                    : 5
% 27.44/28.63  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 27.44/28.63  # Generated clauses                    : 281
% 27.44/28.63  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 181
% 27.44/28.63  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 27
% 27.44/28.63  # Paramodulations                      : 266
% 27.44/28.63  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 27.44/28.63  # Equation resolutions                 : 12
% 27.44/28.63  # Current number of processed clauses  : 215
% 27.44/28.63  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 74
% 27.44/28.63  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 27.44/28.63  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 27.44/28.63  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 140
% 27.44/28.63  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 15
% 27.44/28.63  # ...number of literals in the above   : 35
% 27.44/28.63  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 27.44/28.63  # Current number of archived clauses   : 7
% 27.44/28.63  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3314
% 27.44/28.63  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 973
% 27.44/28.63  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 32
% 27.44/28.63  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2926
% 27.44/28.63  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 27.44/28.63  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 27.44/28.63  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 27.44/28.63  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 27.44/28.63  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 27.44/28.63  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 658850
% 27.44/28.63  
% 27.44/28.63  # -------------------------------------------------
% 27.44/28.63  # User time                : 0.875 s
% 27.44/28.63  # System time              : 0.071 s
% 27.44/28.63  # Total time               : 0.946 s
% 27.44/28.63  # Maximum resident set size: 145352 pages
% 27.44/33.12  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 27.44/33.12  eprover: No such file or directory
% 27.44/33.12  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 27.44/33.12  eprover: No such file or directory
% 27.44/33.13  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 27.44/33.13  eprover: No such file or directory
% 27.44/33.13  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 27.44/33.13  eprover: No such file or directory
% 27.44/33.14  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 27.44/33.14  eprover: No such file or directory
% 27.44/33.14  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 27.44/33.14  eprover: No such file or directory
% 27.44/33.15  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 27.44/33.15  eprover: No such file or directory
% 27.44/33.16  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 27.44/33.16  eprover: No such file or directory
% 27.44/33.16  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 27.44/33.16  eprover: No such file or directory
% 27.44/33.17  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 27.44/33.17  eprover: No such file or directory
% 27.44/33.17  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 27.44/33.17  eprover: No such file or directory
% 27.44/36.37  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 27.44/36.37  eprover: No such file or directory
% 27.44/36.37  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 27.44/36.37  eprover: No such file or directory
% 27.44/36.38  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 27.44/36.38  eprover: No such file or directory
% 27.44/36.38  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 27.44/36.38  eprover: No such file or directory
% 27.44/36.38  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 27.44/36.38  eprover: No such file or directory
% 27.44/36.39  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 27.44/36.39  eprover: No such file or directory
% 27.44/36.39  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 27.44/36.39  eprover: No such file or directory
% 27.44/36.39  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 27.44/36.39  eprover: No such file or directory
% 27.44/36.40  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 27.44/36.40  eprover: No such file or directory
% 27.44/36.40  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 27.44/36.40  eprover: No such file or directory
% 27.44/36.40  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 27.44/36.40  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------