TSTP Solution File: CSR082+6 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : CSR082+6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 07:32:18 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 57.56s 55.34s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 57.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  17 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   80 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   73 (  32   ~;  28   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;  11 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   5 sgn  16   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_26636,axiom,
    ! [X1,X15,X13] :
      ( ( s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) )
     => ( ( s__subclass(X1,X15)
          & s__instance(X13,X1) )
       => s__instance(X13,X15) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QWZoCVVFhb/E---3.1_29739.p',kb_SUMO_26636) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_26635,axiom,
    ! [X1,X15] :
      ( s__subclass(X1,X15)
     => ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QWZoCVVFhb/E---3.1_29739.p',kb_SUMO_26635) ).

fof(local_1,axiom,
    s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Human),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QWZoCVVFhb/E---3.1_29739.p',local_1) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_35206,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Human,s__CognitiveAgent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QWZoCVVFhb/E---3.1_29739.p',kb_SUMO_35206) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_27597,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__CognitiveAgent,s__SentientAgent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QWZoCVVFhb/E---3.1_29739.p',kb_SUMO_27597) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_27595,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__SentientAgent,s__Agent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QWZoCVVFhb/E---3.1_29739.p',kb_SUMO_27595) ).

fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
    ? [X2341,X2342] :
      ( s__capability(s__Reasoning,X2341,s__Jane8_1)
      & s__capability(s__Perception,X2342,s__Jane8_1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QWZoCVVFhb/E---3.1_29739.p',prove_from_ALL) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_34434,axiom,
    ! [X20] :
      ( s__instance(X20,s__Object)
     => ( s__instance(X20,s__CognitiveAgent)
       => s__capability(s__Reasoning,s__agent__m,X20) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QWZoCVVFhb/E---3.1_29739.p',kb_SUMO_34434) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_27592,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Agent,s__Object),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QWZoCVVFhb/E---3.1_29739.p',kb_SUMO_27592) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_34807,axiom,
    ! [X20] :
      ( s__instance(X20,s__Object)
     => ( s__instance(X20,s__SentientAgent)
       => s__capability(s__Perception,s__experiencer__m,X20) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QWZoCVVFhb/E---3.1_29739.p',kb_SUMO_34807) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X2356,X2357,X2358] :
      ( ~ s__instance(X2357,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__instance(X2356,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__subclass(X2356,X2357)
      | ~ s__instance(X2358,X2356)
      | s__instance(X2358,X2357) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26636])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X2354,X2355] :
      ( ( s__instance(X2354,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__subclass(X2354,X2355) )
      & ( s__instance(X2355,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__subclass(X2354,X2355) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26635])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( s__instance(X3,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Human),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( s__instance(s__Jane8_1,X1)
    | ~ s__subclass(s__Human,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Human,s__CognitiveAgent),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_35206]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__CognitiveAgent),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( s__instance(s__Jane8_1,X1)
    | ~ s__subclass(s__CognitiveAgent,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    s__subclass(s__CognitiveAgent,s__SentientAgent),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27597]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__SentientAgent),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( s__instance(s__Jane8_1,X1)
    | ~ s__subclass(s__SentientAgent,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    s__subclass(s__SentientAgent,s__Agent),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27595]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Agent),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

fof(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X2341,X2342] :
        ( s__capability(s__Reasoning,X2341,s__Jane8_1)
        & s__capability(s__Perception,X2342,s__Jane8_1) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X2351] :
      ( ~ s__instance(X2351,s__Object)
      | ~ s__instance(X2351,s__CognitiveAgent)
      | s__capability(s__Reasoning,s__agent__m,X2351) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_34434])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( s__instance(s__Jane8_1,X1)
    | ~ s__subclass(s__Agent,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Agent,s__Object),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27592]) ).

fof(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2343,X2344] :
      ( ~ s__capability(s__Reasoning,X2343,s__Jane8_1)
      | ~ s__capability(s__Perception,X2344,s__Jane8_1) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_26])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( s__capability(s__Reasoning,s__agent__m,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__CognitiveAgent) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Object),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

fof(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X2347] :
      ( ~ s__instance(X2347,s__Object)
      | ~ s__instance(X2347,s__SentientAgent)
      | s__capability(s__Perception,s__experiencer__m,X2347) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_34807])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ s__capability(s__Reasoning,X1,s__Jane8_1)
    | ~ s__capability(s__Perception,X2,s__Jane8_1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    s__capability(s__Reasoning,s__agent__m,s__Jane8_1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( s__capability(s__Perception,s__experiencer__m,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__SentientAgent) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__capability(s__Perception,X1,s__Jane8_1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_32]),c_0_22])]),c_0_37]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 27.13/27.22  % Problem    : CSR082+6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 27.23/27.25  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 27.26/27.46  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 27.26/27.46  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 27.26/27.46  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 27.26/27.46  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 27.26/27.46  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 27.26/27.46  % CPULimit   : 300
% 27.26/27.46  % WCLimit    : 300
% 27.26/27.46  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 15:05:35 EDT 2024
% 27.26/27.46  % CPUTime    : 
% 53.41/53.62  Running first-order theorem proving
% 53.41/53.62  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QWZoCVVFhb/E---3.1_29739.p
% 57.56/55.34  # Version: 3.1.0
% 57.56/55.34  # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 57.56/55.34  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 57.56/55.34  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1495s (5) cores
% 57.56/55.34  # Starting new_bool_3 with 299s (1) cores
% 57.56/55.34  # Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 57.56/55.34  # Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 57.56/55.34  # new_bool_1 with pid 31033 completed with status 0
% 57.56/55.34  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 57.56/55.34  # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 57.56/55.34  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 57.56/55.34  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1495s (5) cores
% 57.56/55.34  # Starting new_bool_3 with 299s (1) cores
% 57.56/55.34  # Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 57.56/55.34  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 57.56/55.34  # Search class: FGHSS-FSLM33-MFFFFFNN
% 57.56/55.34  # partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM33-MFFFFFNN
% 57.56/55.34  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 299 seconds (299 total)
% 57.56/55.34  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 81s (1) cores
% 57.56/55.34  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with pid 31036 completed with status 0
% 57.56/55.34  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI
% 57.56/55.34  # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 57.56/55.34  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 57.56/55.34  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1495s (5) cores
% 57.56/55.34  # Starting new_bool_3 with 299s (1) cores
% 57.56/55.34  # Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 57.56/55.34  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 57.56/55.34  # Search class: FGHSS-FSLM33-MFFFFFNN
% 57.56/55.34  # partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM33-MFFFFFNN
% 57.56/55.34  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 299 seconds (299 total)
% 57.56/55.34  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 81s (1) cores
% 57.56/55.34  # Preprocessing time       : 0.033 s
% 57.56/55.34  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 57.56/55.34  
% 57.56/55.34  # Proof found!
% 57.56/55.34  # SZS status Theorem
% 57.56/55.34  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 57.56/55.34  # Parsed axioms                        : 55588
% 57.56/55.34  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 55373
% 57.56/55.34  # Initial clauses                      : 321
% 57.56/55.34  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 19
% 57.56/55.34  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 302
% 57.56/55.34  # Processed clauses                    : 898
% 57.56/55.34  # ...of these trivial                  : 33
% 57.56/55.34  # ...subsumed                          : 6
% 57.56/55.34  # ...remaining for further processing  : 858
% 57.56/55.34  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 46
% 57.56/55.34  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 57.56/55.34  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 57.56/55.34  # Backward-rewritten                   : 11
% 57.56/55.34  # Generated clauses                    : 1026
% 57.56/55.34  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 894
% 57.56/55.34  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 57.56/55.34  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 67
% 57.56/55.34  # Paramodulations                      : 980
% 57.56/55.34  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 57.56/55.34  # NegExts                              : 0
% 57.56/55.34  # Equation resolutions                 : 46
% 57.56/55.34  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 57.56/55.34  # Total rewrite steps                  : 265
% 57.56/55.34  # ...of those cached                   : 167
% 57.56/55.34  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 57.56/55.34  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 57.56/55.34  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 57.56/55.34  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 57.56/55.34  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 57.56/55.34  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 57.56/55.34  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 57.56/55.34  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 57.56/55.34  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 57.56/55.34  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 57.56/55.34  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 57.56/55.34  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 57.56/55.34  # Current number of processed clauses  : 504
% 57.56/55.34  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 201
% 57.56/55.34  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 57.56/55.34  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 57.56/55.34  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 300
% 57.56/55.34  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 594
% 57.56/55.34  # ...number of literals in the above   : 2231
% 57.56/55.34  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 57.56/55.34  # Current number of archived clauses   : 308
% 57.56/55.34  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 53545
% 57.56/55.34  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3738
% 57.56/55.34  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 73
% 57.56/55.34  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1036
% 57.56/55.34  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 57.56/55.34  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 7
% 57.56/55.34  # BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 57.56/55.34  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 57.56/55.34  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 57.56/55.34  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 696799
% 57.56/55.34  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 295664
% 57.56/55.34  
% 57.56/55.34  # -------------------------------------------------
% 57.56/55.34  # User time                : 0.373 s
% 57.56/55.34  # System time              : 0.139 s
% 57.56/55.34  # Total time               : 0.512 s
% 57.56/55.34  # Maximum resident set size: 132608 pages
% 57.56/55.34  
% 57.56/55.34  # -------------------------------------------------
% 57.56/55.34  # User time                : 1.419 s
% 57.56/55.34  # System time              : 0.207 s
% 57.56/55.34  # Total time               : 1.626 s
% 57.56/55.34  # Maximum resident set size: 58284 pages
% 57.56/55.34  % E---3.1 exiting
% 57.56/55.34  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------