TSTP Solution File: CSR082+5 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR082+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 13.17s 4.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 13.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 35 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 35 RR)
% Number of literals : 68 ( 0 equ; 39 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 11 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 9 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1787,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-073dwt4v/lgb.p',i_0_1787) ).
cnf(i_0_1738,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-073dwt4v/lgb.p',i_0_1738) ).
cnf(i_0_1739,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-073dwt4v/lgb.p',i_0_1739) ).
cnf(i_0_2913,plain,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__CognitiveAgent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-073dwt4v/lgb.p',i_0_2913) ).
cnf(i_0_3487,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__capability(s__Reasoning,X1,s__Jane8_1)
| ~ s__capability(s__Perception,X2,s__Jane8_1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-073dwt4v/lgb.p',i_0_3487) ).
cnf(i_0_2642,plain,
( s__capability(s__Reasoning,s__agent__m,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__CognitiveAgent) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-073dwt4v/lgb.p',i_0_2642) ).
cnf(i_0_3169,plain,
s__subclass(s__CognitiveAgent,s__SentientAgent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-073dwt4v/lgb.p',i_0_3169) ).
cnf(i_0_3486,plain,
s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Human),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-073dwt4v/lgb.p',i_0_3486) ).
cnf(i_0_2812,plain,
( s__capability(s__Perception,s__experiencer__m,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SentientAgent) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-073dwt4v/lgb.p',i_0_2812) ).
cnf(i_0_3160,plain,
s__subclass(s__SentientAgent,s__Agent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-073dwt4v/lgb.p',i_0_3160) ).
cnf(i_0_3141,plain,
s__subclass(s__Agent,s__Object),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-073dwt4v/lgb.p',i_0_3141) ).
cnf(c_0_3499,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
i_0_1787 ).
cnf(c_0_3500,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1) ),
i_0_1738 ).
cnf(c_0_3501,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
i_0_1739 ).
cnf(c_0_3502,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3499,c_0_3500]),c_0_3501]) ).
cnf(c_0_3503,plain,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__CognitiveAgent),
i_0_2913 ).
cnf(c_0_3504,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__capability(s__Reasoning,X1,s__Jane8_1)
| ~ s__capability(s__Perception,X2,s__Jane8_1) ),
i_0_3487 ).
cnf(c_0_3505,plain,
( s__capability(s__Reasoning,s__agent__m,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__CognitiveAgent) ),
i_0_2642 ).
cnf(c_0_3506,plain,
s__subclass(s__CognitiveAgent,s__SentientAgent),
i_0_3169 ).
cnf(c_0_3507,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Human) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3502,c_0_3503]) ).
cnf(c_0_3508,plain,
s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Human),
i_0_3486 ).
cnf(c_0_3509,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__capability(s__Perception,X1,s__Jane8_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3504,c_0_3505]) ).
cnf(c_0_3510,plain,
( s__capability(s__Perception,s__experiencer__m,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SentientAgent) ),
i_0_2812 ).
cnf(c_0_3511,plain,
s__subclass(s__SentientAgent,s__Agent),
i_0_3160 ).
cnf(c_0_3512,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SentientAgent)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__CognitiveAgent) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3502,c_0_3506]) ).
cnf(c_0_3513,plain,
s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__CognitiveAgent),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3507,c_0_3508]) ).
cnf(c_0_3514,plain,
( ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__SentientAgent) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3509,c_0_3510]) ).
cnf(c_0_3515,plain,
s__subclass(s__Agent,s__Object),
i_0_3141 ).
cnf(c_0_3516,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Agent)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SentientAgent) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3502,c_0_3511]) ).
cnf(c_0_3517,plain,
s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__SentientAgent),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3512,c_0_3513]) ).
cnf(c_0_3518,plain,
( ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__SentientAgent) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3514,c_0_3513])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3519,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Agent) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3502,c_0_3515]) ).
cnf(c_0_3520,plain,
s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Agent),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3516,c_0_3517]) ).
cnf(c_0_3521,plain,
~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Object),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3518,c_0_3517])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3522,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3519,c_0_3520]),c_0_3521]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR082+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 12:27:16 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.55/0.75 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/0.75 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.55/0.75 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.55/0.75 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 13.17/4.39 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 13.17/4.39 # No SInE strategy applied
% 13.17/4.39 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 13.17/4.39 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 13.17/4.39 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 13.17/4.39 #
% 13.17/4.39 # Preprocessing time : 0.038 s
% 13.17/4.39
% 13.17/4.39 # Proof found!
% 13.17/4.39 # SZS status Theorem
% 13.17/4.39 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 13.17/4.39 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 13.17/4.39
% 13.17/4.39 # -------------------------------------------------
% 13.17/4.39 # User time : 0.571 s
% 13.17/4.39 # System time : 0.040 s
% 13.17/4.39 # Total time : 0.611 s
% 13.17/4.39 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 13.17/4.39
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------