TSTP Solution File: CSR082+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR082+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:35 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 11.33s 4.06s
% Output : CNFRefutation 11.33s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 34 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 34 RR)
% Number of literals : 67 ( 0 equ; 39 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 11 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 9 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_886,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t111s04d/lgb.p',i_0_886) ).
cnf(i_0_851,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t111s04d/lgb.p',i_0_851) ).
cnf(i_0_852,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t111s04d/lgb.p',i_0_852) ).
cnf(i_0_3065,plain,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__Agent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t111s04d/lgb.p',i_0_3065) ).
cnf(i_0_3432,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__capability(s__Reasoning,X1,s__Jane8_1)
| ~ s__capability(s__Perception,X2,s__Jane8_1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t111s04d/lgb.p',i_0_3432) ).
cnf(i_0_1569,plain,
( s__capability(s__Reasoning,s__agent__m,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__CognitiveAgent) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t111s04d/lgb.p',i_0_1569) ).
cnf(i_0_2144,plain,
s__subclass(s__Agent,s__Object),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t111s04d/lgb.p',i_0_2144) ).
cnf(i_0_3431,plain,
s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Human),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t111s04d/lgb.p',i_0_3431) ).
cnf(i_0_1765,plain,
( s__capability(s__Perception,s__experiencer__m,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SentientAgent) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t111s04d/lgb.p',i_0_1765) ).
cnf(i_0_3068,plain,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__SentientAgent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t111s04d/lgb.p',i_0_3068) ).
cnf(i_0_1844,plain,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__CognitiveAgent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t111s04d/lgb.p',i_0_1844) ).
cnf(c_0_3444,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
i_0_886 ).
cnf(c_0_3445,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1) ),
i_0_851 ).
cnf(c_0_3446,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
i_0_852 ).
cnf(c_0_3447,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3444,c_0_3445]),c_0_3446]) ).
cnf(c_0_3448,plain,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__Agent),
i_0_3065 ).
cnf(c_0_3449,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__capability(s__Reasoning,X1,s__Jane8_1)
| ~ s__capability(s__Perception,X2,s__Jane8_1) ),
i_0_3432 ).
cnf(c_0_3450,plain,
( s__capability(s__Reasoning,s__agent__m,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__CognitiveAgent) ),
i_0_1569 ).
cnf(c_0_3451,plain,
s__subclass(s__Agent,s__Object),
i_0_2144 ).
cnf(c_0_3452,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Agent)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Human) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3447,c_0_3448]) ).
cnf(c_0_3453,plain,
s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Human),
i_0_3431 ).
cnf(c_0_3454,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__capability(s__Perception,X1,s__Jane8_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3449,c_0_3450]) ).
cnf(c_0_3455,plain,
( s__capability(s__Perception,s__experiencer__m,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SentientAgent) ),
i_0_1765 ).
cnf(c_0_3456,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Agent) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3447,c_0_3451]) ).
cnf(c_0_3457,plain,
s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Agent),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3452,c_0_3453]) ).
cnf(c_0_3458,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__SentientAgent) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3454,c_0_3455]) ).
cnf(c_0_3459,plain,
s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Object),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3456,c_0_3457]) ).
cnf(c_0_3460,plain,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__SentientAgent),
i_0_3068 ).
cnf(c_0_3461,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__SentientAgent) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3458,c_0_3459])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3462,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SentientAgent)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Human) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3447,c_0_3460]) ).
cnf(c_0_3463,plain,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__CognitiveAgent),
i_0_1844 ).
cnf(c_0_3464,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__CognitiveAgent),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3461,c_0_3462]),c_0_3453])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3465,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Human) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3447,c_0_3463]) ).
cnf(c_0_3466,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3464,c_0_3465]),c_0_3453])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : CSR082+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 17:55:11 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.47 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.54/0.72 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.54/0.72 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.54/0.72 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.54/0.72 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 11.33/4.06 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 11.33/4.06 # SinE strategy is gf600_h_gu_R05_F100_L20000
% 11.33/4.06 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 11.33/4.06 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 11.33/4.06 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 11.33/4.06 #
% 11.33/4.06 # Preprocessing time : 0.042 s
% 11.33/4.06 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 11.33/4.06
% 11.33/4.06 # Proof found!
% 11.33/4.06 # SZS status Theorem
% 11.33/4.06 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 11.33/4.06 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 11.33/4.06
% 11.33/4.06 # -------------------------------------------------
% 11.33/4.06 # User time : 0.169 s
% 11.33/4.06 # System time : 0.011 s
% 11.33/4.06 # Total time : 0.180 s
% 11.33/4.06 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 11.33/4.06
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------