TSTP Solution File: CSR079+4 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR079+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:19 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.98s 7.17s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.98s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 15
% Number of leaves : 18
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 61 ( 45 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 90 ( 26 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 54 ( 25 ~; 22 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 17 ( 17 usr; 17 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 2 sgn 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(local_24,axiom,
s__Class5_2 = s__Class5_3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_24) ).
fof(local_23,axiom,
s__Class5_1 = s__Class5_2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_23) ).
fof(local_25,axiom,
s__Class5_3 = s__Class5_4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_25) ).
fof(local_26,axiom,
s__Class5_4 = s__Class5_5,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_26) ).
fof(local_27,axiom,
s__Class5_5 = s__Class5_6,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_27) ).
fof(local_28,axiom,
s__Class5_6 = s__Class5_7,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_28) ).
fof(local_29,axiom,
s__Class5_7 = s__Class5_8,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_29) ).
fof(local_30,axiom,
s__Class5_8 = s__Class5_9,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_30) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__subclass(X6,X7)
& s__instance(X8,X6) )
=> s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( s__subclass(X6,X7)
=> ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).
fof(local_31,axiom,
s__Class5_9 = s__Class5_10,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_31) ).
fof(local_33,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Class5_10,s__Reptile),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_33) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_6100,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Reptile,s__ColdBloodedVertebrate),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_6100) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_6026,axiom,
s__subclass(s__ColdBloodedVertebrate,s__Vertebrate),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_6026) ).
fof(prove_from_SUMO,conjecture,
s__instance(s__Organism5_1,s__Animal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',prove_from_SUMO) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_5997,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Vertebrate,s__Animal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_5997) ).
fof(local_32,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Lizard5_1,s__Class5_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_32) ).
fof(local_2,axiom,
s__instance(s__Organism5_1,s__Lizard5_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_2) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
s__Class5_2 = s__Class5_3,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
s__Class5_1 = s__Class5_2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
s__Class5_3 = s__Class5_4,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
s__Class5_3 = s__Class5_1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
s__Class5_4 = s__Class5_5,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
s__Class5_4 = s__Class5_1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
s__Class5_5 = s__Class5_6,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
s__Class5_5 = s__Class5_1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
s__Class5_6 = s__Class5_7,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
s__Class5_6 = s__Class5_1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
s__Class5_7 = s__Class5_8,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
s__Class5_7 = s__Class5_1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
s__Class5_8 = s__Class5_9,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
s__Class5_8 = s__Class5_1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
fof(c_0_32,plain,
! [X9,X10,X11] :
( ~ s__instance(X10,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X9,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X9,X10)
| ~ s__instance(X11,X9)
| s__instance(X11,X10) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_33,plain,
! [X8,X9] :
( ( s__instance(X8,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X8,X9) )
& ( s__instance(X9,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X8,X9) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
s__Class5_9 = s__Class5_10,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
s__Class5_9 = s__Class5_1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
s__subclass(s__Class5_10,s__Reptile),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
s__Class5_10 = s__Class5_1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
s__subclass(s__Reptile,s__ColdBloodedVertebrate),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_6100]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
s__subclass(s__Class5_1,s__Reptile),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
s__subclass(s__ColdBloodedVertebrate,s__Vertebrate),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_6026]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__ColdBloodedVertebrate)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Reptile) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Reptile)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Class5_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_43]) ).
fof(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Organism5_1,s__Animal),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
s__subclass(s__Vertebrate,s__Animal),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_5997]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Vertebrate)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__ColdBloodedVertebrate) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_44]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__ColdBloodedVertebrate)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Class5_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
s__subclass(s__Lizard5_1,s__Class5_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_32]) ).
fof(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Organism5_1,s__Animal),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_47]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Animal)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Vertebrate) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_48]) ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Vertebrate)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Class5_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]) ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Class5_1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Lizard5_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_51]) ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
s__instance(s__Organism5_1,s__Lizard5_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Organism5_1,s__Animal),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_52]) ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Animal)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Class5_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]) ).
cnf(c_0_59,plain,
s__instance(s__Organism5_1,s__Class5_1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]) ).
cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58]),c_0_59])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR079+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 11:36:56 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.98/7.17 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.98/7.17 # Preprocessing time : 0.394 s
% 0.98/7.17
% 0.98/7.17 # Proof found!
% 0.98/7.17 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.98/7.17 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.98/7.17 # Proof object total steps : 61
% 0.98/7.17 # Proof object clause steps : 39
% 0.98/7.17 # Proof object formula steps : 22
% 0.98/7.17 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.98/7.17 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.98/7.17 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.98/7.17 # Proof object initial clauses used : 19
% 0.98/7.17 # Proof object initial formulas used : 18
% 0.98/7.17 # Proof object generating inferences : 10
% 0.98/7.17 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 13
% 0.98/7.17 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.98/7.17 # Parsed axioms : 7251
% 0.98/7.17 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.98/7.17 # Initial clauses : 8442
% 0.98/7.17 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 63
% 0.98/7.17 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8379
% 0.98/7.17 # Processed clauses : 14245
% 0.98/7.17 # ...of these trivial : 1031
% 0.98/7.17 # ...subsumed : 1094
% 0.98/7.17 # ...remaining for further processing : 12120
% 0.98/7.17 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1462
% 0.98/7.17 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.98/7.17 # Backward-subsumed : 688
% 0.98/7.17 # Backward-rewritten : 2504
% 0.98/7.17 # Generated clauses : 352672
% 0.98/7.17 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 350913
% 0.98/7.17 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1343
% 0.98/7.17 # Paramodulations : 351065
% 0.98/7.17 # Factorizations : 6
% 0.98/7.17 # Equation resolutions : 1556
% 0.98/7.17 # Current number of processed clauses : 8904
% 0.98/7.17 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4299
% 0.98/7.17 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.98/7.17 # Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.98/7.17 # Non-unit-clauses : 4599
% 0.98/7.17 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 42623
% 0.98/7.17 # ...number of literals in the above : 169266
% 0.98/7.17 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.98/7.17 # Current number of archived clauses : 3192
% 0.98/7.17 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5483214
% 0.98/7.17 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2513009
% 0.98/7.17 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2520
% 0.98/7.17 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2346941
% 0.98/7.17 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.98/7.17 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2267
% 0.98/7.17 # BW rewrite match successes : 1421
% 0.98/7.17 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.98/7.17 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.98/7.17 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3447069
% 0.98/7.17
% 0.98/7.17 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.98/7.17 # User time : 5.165 s
% 0.98/7.17 # System time : 0.146 s
% 0.98/7.17 # Total time : 5.311 s
% 0.98/7.17 # Maximum resident set size: 177680 pages
% 0.99/24.49 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.99/24.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.99/24.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.99/24.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.99/24.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.99/24.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.99/24.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.99/24.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.99/24.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.99/24.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.99/24.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.99/24.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.99/24.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.99/24.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.99/24.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.99/24.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.99/24.56 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------