TSTP Solution File: CSR079+3 by nanoCoP---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem  : CSR079+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : nanocop.sh %s %d

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:04:22 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unknown 151.96s 152.81s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : CSR079+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Thu May 18 23:47:51 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 13.25/13.01  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 13.25/13.01  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 13.25/13.01  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 26.33/26.42  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 26.33/26.42  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 26.33/26.42  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 36.97/37.53  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 36.97/37.53  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 36.97/37.53  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 47.93/48.12  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 47.93/48.12  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 47.93/48.12  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 52.24/53.19  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 52.24/53.19  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 52.24/53.19  Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 63.28/64.74  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 63.28/64.74  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 63.28/64.74  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 73.89/75.88  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 73.89/75.88  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 73.89/75.88  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 84.94/86.57  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 84.94/86.57  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 84.94/86.57  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 98.77/100.69  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 98.77/100.69  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 98.77/100.69  Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 151.93/151.87  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 151.93/151.87  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 151.93/151.87  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 151.96/152.81  Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------