TSTP Solution File: CSR075+3 by nanoCoP---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem  : CSR075+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : nanocop.sh %s %d

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:04:20 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unknown 147.81s 147.83s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : CSR075+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Fri May 19 00:35:32 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 10.91/10.70  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 10.91/10.70  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 10.91/10.70  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 21.89/21.24  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 21.89/21.24  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 21.89/21.24  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 32.87/32.71  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 32.87/32.71  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 32.87/32.71  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 43.86/44.15  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 43.86/44.15  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 43.86/44.15  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 48.15/49.10  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 48.15/49.10  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 48.15/49.10  Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 59.11/59.64  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 59.11/59.64  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 59.11/59.64  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 69.55/70.65  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 69.55/70.65  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 69.55/70.65  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 80.75/81.71  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 80.75/81.71  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 80.75/81.71  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 94.57/95.65  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 94.57/95.65  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 94.57/95.65  Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 147.64/146.84  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 147.64/146.84  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 147.64/146.84  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 147.76/147.83  Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------