TSTP Solution File: CSR074+3 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : CSR074+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:18:07 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.48s 0.78s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   71 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   62 (  27   ~;  22   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   0 sgn  14   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query174,conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
   => ( inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
      & geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query174) ).

fof(ax2_7997,axiom,
    ! [X21,X22] :
      ( ( mtvisible(X21)
        & genlmt(X21,X22) )
     => mtvisible(X22) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7997) ).

fof(ax2_7302,axiom,
    ! [X15,X16,X17] :
      ( ( inregion(X15,X16)
        & inregion(X16,X17) )
     => inregion(X15,X17) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7302) ).

fof(ax2_1935,axiom,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( geographicalsubregions(X3,X4)
     => inregion(X4,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1935) ).

fof(ax2_1651,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
   => geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1651) ).

fof(ax2_2249,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
   => geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_2249) ).

fof(ax2_1188,axiom,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1188) ).

fof(ax2_912,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
   => inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_912) ).

fof(ax2_1111,axiom,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1111) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
     => ( inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
        & geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query174]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X45,X46] :
      ( ~ mtvisible(X45)
      | ~ genlmt(X45,X46)
      | mtvisible(X46) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7997])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
    & ( ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
      | ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X41,X42,X43] :
      ( ~ inregion(X41,X42)
      | ~ inregion(X42,X43)
      | inregion(X41,X43) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7302])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X25,X26] :
      ( ~ geographicalsubregions(X25,X26)
      | inregion(X26,X25) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1935])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
    | geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1651])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
    | geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_2249])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ genlmt(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_1188]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X3)
    | ~ inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ inregion(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( inregion(X2,X1)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
    | inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_912])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
    | ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_1111]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ inregion(X1,X3)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
    | ~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : CSR074+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 02:04:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.48  Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/0.78  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.48/0.78  # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.48/0.78  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.48/0.78  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.48/0.78  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.78  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.78  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.78  # sh5l with pid 14093 completed with status 0
% 0.48/0.78  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.48/0.78  # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.48/0.78  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.48/0.78  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.48/0.78  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.78  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.78  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.78  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.48/0.78  # Search class: FHHNM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.48/0.78  # partial match(2): FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.48/0.78  # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.48/0.78  # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.78  # G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 14096 completed with status 0
% 0.48/0.78  # Result found by G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 0.48/0.78  # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.48/0.78  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.48/0.78  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.48/0.78  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.78  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.78  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.78  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.48/0.78  # Search class: FHHNM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.48/0.78  # partial match(2): FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.48/0.78  # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.48/0.78  # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.78  # Preprocessing time       : 0.016 s
% 0.48/0.78  
% 0.48/0.78  # Proof found!
% 0.48/0.78  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.48/0.78  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.48/0.78  # Parsed axioms                        : 8006
% 0.48/0.78  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 7415
% 0.48/0.78  # Initial clauses                      : 592
% 0.48/0.78  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.48/0.78  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 592
% 0.48/0.78  # Processed clauses                    : 856
% 0.48/0.78  # ...of these trivial                  : 99
% 0.48/0.78  # ...subsumed                          : 70
% 0.48/0.78  # ...remaining for further processing  : 687
% 0.48/0.78  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.48/0.78  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.48/0.78  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.48/0.78  # Backward-rewritten                   : 15
% 0.48/0.78  # Generated clauses                    : 1300
% 0.48/0.78  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1195
% 0.48/0.78  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.48/0.78  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.48/0.78  # Paramodulations                      : 1300
% 0.48/0.78  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.48/0.78  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.48/0.78  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.48/0.78  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.48/0.78  # Total rewrite steps                  : 175
% 0.48/0.78  # ...of those cached                   : 84
% 0.48/0.78  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.48/0.78  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.48/0.78  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.48/0.78  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.48/0.78  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.48/0.78  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.48/0.78  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.48/0.78  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.48/0.78  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.48/0.78  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.48/0.78  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.48/0.78  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.48/0.78  # Current number of processed clauses  : 670
% 0.48/0.78  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 270
% 0.48/0.78  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.48/0.78  #    Negative unit clauses             : 49
% 0.48/0.78  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 351
% 0.48/0.78  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 928
% 0.48/0.78  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1702
% 0.48/0.78  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.48/0.78  # Current number of archived clauses   : 17
% 0.48/0.78  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 11474
% 0.48/0.78  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10175
% 0.48/0.78  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 66
% 0.48/0.78  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5595
% 0.48/0.78  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.48/0.78  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 7
% 0.48/0.78  # BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 0.48/0.78  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.48/0.78  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.48/0.78  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 83815
% 0.48/0.78  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 31800
% 0.48/0.78  
% 0.48/0.78  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.78  # User time                : 0.089 s
% 0.48/0.78  # System time              : 0.039 s
% 0.48/0.78  # Total time               : 0.128 s
% 0.48/0.78  # Maximum resident set size: 18512 pages
% 0.48/0.78  
% 0.48/0.78  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.78  # User time                : 0.222 s
% 0.48/0.78  # System time              : 0.055 s
% 0.48/0.78  # Total time               : 0.277 s
% 0.48/0.78  # Maximum resident set size: 7956 pages
% 0.48/0.78  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------