TSTP Solution File: CSR074+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR074+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:13 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.27s 1.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 37 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 73 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 64 ( 28 ~; 23 |; 5 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 0 sgn 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query124,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> ( inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
& geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query124) ).
fof(ax1_1123,axiom,
! [X20,X21] :
( ( mtvisible(X20)
& genlmt(X20,X21) )
=> mtvisible(X21) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_1123) ).
fof(ax1_933,axiom,
! [X13,X14,X19] :
( ( inregion(X13,X14)
& inregion(X14,X19) )
=> inregion(X13,X19) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_933) ).
fof(ax1_128,axiom,
! [X5,X6] :
( geographicalsubregions(X5,X6)
=> inregion(X6,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_128) ).
fof(ax1_472,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_472) ).
fof(ax1_478,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
=> geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_478) ).
fof(ax1_326,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_326) ).
fof(ax1_63,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_63) ).
fof(ax1_82,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_82) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> ( inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
& geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query124]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X22,X23] :
( ~ mtvisible(X22)
| ~ genlmt(X22,X23)
| mtvisible(X23) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_1123])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
& ( ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
| ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X20,X21,X22] :
( ~ inregion(X20,X21)
| ~ inregion(X21,X22)
| inregion(X20,X22) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_933])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X7,X8] :
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X7,X8)
| inregion(X8,X7) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_128])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_472]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_478]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_326]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_63]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( inregion(X1,X2)
| ~ inregion(X3,X2)
| ~ inregion(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( inregion(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_82]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
| ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( inregion(X1,X2)
| ~ inregion(X1,X3)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( inregion(X1,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
| ~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : CSR074+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 22:35:34 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.27/1.45 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.27/1.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.27/1.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.032 s
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.27/1.45 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.27/1.45 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1116
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses : 17
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 17
% 0.27/1.45 # Processed clauses : 36
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # ...subsumed : 4
% 0.27/1.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 31
% 0.27/1.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Generated clauses : 31
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 19
% 0.27/1.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Paramodulations : 31
% 0.27/1.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 31
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 20
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.27/1.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 41
% 0.27/1.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 41
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.27/1.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.27/1.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 8292
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/1.45 # User time : 0.031 s
% 0.27/1.45 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Total time : 0.033 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Maximum resident set size: 5140 pages
% 0.27/1.45 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.27/1.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.051 s
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof found!
% 0.27/1.45 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.27/1.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object total steps : 37
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object clause steps : 20
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object formula steps : 17
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object initial clauses used : 10
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object initial formulas used : 9
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object generating inferences : 6
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 11
% 0.27/1.45 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.27/1.45 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses : 1133
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1133
% 0.27/1.45 # Processed clauses : 1201
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of these trivial : 7
% 0.27/1.45 # ...subsumed : 32
% 0.27/1.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 1162
% 0.27/1.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-rewritten : 10
% 0.27/1.45 # Generated clauses : 2528
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 2300
% 0.27/1.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Paramodulations : 2528
% 0.27/1.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 1151
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 375
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Negative unit clauses : 25
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 751
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2223
% 0.27/1.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 3901
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 11
% 0.27/1.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 103037
% 0.27/1.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 95226
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 31
% 0.27/1.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8078
% 0.27/1.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 7
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 66000
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/1.45 # User time : 0.101 s
% 0.27/1.45 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Total time : 0.108 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Maximum resident set size: 11128 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------