TSTP Solution File: CSR073-10 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR073-10 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:18:05 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.84s 1.27s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.84s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 24 ( 24 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 24 ( 23 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 5 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(ax3_2560,axiom,
ifeq4(tptptypes_9_401(X1,X2),true,tptptypes_8_400(X2,X1),true) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_2560) ).
cnf(ax3_27254,axiom,
tptptypes_9_401(c_pushingababycarriage,c_tptpcol_16_9612) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_27254) ).
cnf(ifeq_axiom,axiom,
ifeq4(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom) ).
cnf(ax3_26515,axiom,
ifeq4(tptptypes_8_400(X1,X2),true,tptptypes_7_396(X1,X2),true) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_26515) ).
cnf(ax3_16571,axiom,
ifeq4(tptptypes_7_396(X1,X2),true,tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2),true) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_16571) ).
cnf(ax3_11372,axiom,
ifeq4(tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2),true,tptptypes_5_387(X1,X2),true) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_11372) ).
cnf(goal,negated_conjecture,
a != b,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal) ).
cnf(query223_1,negated_conjecture,
ifeq3(tptptypes_5_387(X1,c_pushingababycarriage),true,a,b) = b,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query223_1) ).
cnf(ifeq_axiom_001,axiom,
ifeq3(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom_001) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
ifeq4(tptptypes_9_401(X1,X2),true,tptptypes_8_400(X2,X1),true) = true,
ax3_2560 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
tptptypes_9_401(c_pushingababycarriage,c_tptpcol_16_9612) = true,
ax3_27254 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
ifeq4(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
ifeq_axiom ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
ifeq4(tptptypes_8_400(X1,X2),true,tptptypes_7_396(X1,X2),true) = true,
ax3_26515 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
tptptypes_8_400(c_tptpcol_16_9612,c_pushingababycarriage) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
ifeq4(tptptypes_7_396(X1,X2),true,tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2),true) = true,
ax3_16571 ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
tptptypes_7_396(c_tptpcol_16_9612,c_pushingababycarriage) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
ifeq4(tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2),true,tptptypes_5_387(X1,X2),true) = true,
ax3_11372 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
tptptypes_6_388(c_tptpcol_16_9612,c_pushingababycarriage) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
a != b,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[goal]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
ifeq3(tptptypes_5_387(X1,c_pushingababycarriage),true,a,b) = b,
query223_1 ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
tptptypes_5_387(c_tptpcol_16_9612,c_pushingababycarriage) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
ifeq3(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
ifeq_axiom_001 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
a != b,
c_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_22]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : CSR073-10 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.14/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Sun May 19 00:58:53 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.84/1.27 # Version: 3.1.0
% 1.84/1.27 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 1.84/1.27 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.84/1.27 # Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 1.84/1.27 # Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 1.84/1.27 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.84/1.27 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 300s (1) cores
% 1.84/1.27 # sh5l with pid 18931 completed with status 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Result found by sh5l
% 1.84/1.27 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 1.84/1.27 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.84/1.27 # Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 1.84/1.27 # Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 1.84/1.27 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.84/1.27 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 1.84/1.27 # Search class: FUUPM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 1.84/1.27 # partial match(1): FUUPM-FFMM31-DFFFFFNN
% 1.84/1.27 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.84/1.27 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 75s (1) cores
% 1.84/1.27 # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 18962 completed with status 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.84/1.27 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 1.84/1.27 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.84/1.27 # Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 1.84/1.27 # Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 1.84/1.27 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.84/1.27 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 1.84/1.27 # Search class: FUUPM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 1.84/1.27 # partial match(1): FUUPM-FFMM31-DFFFFFNN
% 1.84/1.27 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.84/1.27 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 75s (1) cores
% 1.84/1.27 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 1.84/1.27 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.84/1.27
% 1.84/1.27 # Proof found!
% 1.84/1.27 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.84/1.27 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.84/1.27 # Parsed axioms : 44220
% 1.84/1.27 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 43836
% 1.84/1.27 # Initial clauses : 384
% 1.84/1.27 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Initial clauses in saturation : 384
% 1.84/1.27 # Processed clauses : 718
% 1.84/1.27 # ...of these trivial : 70
% 1.84/1.27 # ...subsumed : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # ...remaining for further processing : 648
% 1.84/1.27 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Generated clauses : 462
% 1.84/1.27 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 335
% 1.84/1.27 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Paramodulations : 462
% 1.84/1.27 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # NegExts : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Total rewrite steps : 364
% 1.84/1.27 # ...of those cached : 193
% 1.84/1.27 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Propositional check models : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.84/1.27 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.84/1.27 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.84/1.27 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.84/1.27 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.84/1.27 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.84/1.27 # Current number of processed clauses : 318
% 1.84/1.27 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 317
% 1.84/1.27 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 1.84/1.27 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 330
% 1.84/1.27 # ...number of literals in the above : 330
% 1.84/1.27 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Current number of archived clauses : 330
% 1.84/1.27 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # BW rewrite match attempts : 443
% 1.84/1.27 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.84/1.27 # Termbank termtop insertions : 343358
% 1.84/1.27 # Search garbage collected termcells : 125416
% 1.84/1.27
% 1.84/1.27 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.84/1.27 # User time : 0.170 s
% 1.84/1.27 # System time : 0.101 s
% 1.84/1.27 # Total time : 0.272 s
% 1.84/1.27 # Maximum resident set size: 77932 pages
% 1.84/1.27
% 1.84/1.27 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.84/1.27 # User time : 0.621 s
% 1.84/1.27 # System time : 0.126 s
% 1.84/1.27 # Total time : 0.747 s
% 1.84/1.27 # Maximum resident set size: 30288 pages
% 1.84/1.27 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------