TSTP Solution File: CSR073+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : CSR073+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:25:03 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.43s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : CSR073+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 15:44:50 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.43  
% 0.18/0.43  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.18/0.43  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.18/0.43  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.43  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.18/0.43  SPASS derived 38 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 88 clauses.
% 0.18/0.43  SPASS allocated 97733 KBytes.
% 0.18/0.43  SPASS spent	0:00:00.09 on the problem.
% 0.18/0.43  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.18/0.43  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.18/0.43  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.18/0.43  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.18/0.43  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.18/0.43  
% 0.18/0.43  
% 0.18/0.43  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 17 :
% 0.18/0.43  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.18/0.43  1[0:Inp] ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)*.
% 0.18/0.43  14[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member237_mt)*l.
% 0.18/0.43  17[0:Inp] || tptptypes_5_387(u,c_pushingababycarriage)*+ -> .
% 0.18/0.43  18[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_tptp_member237_mt)+ -> tptptypes_9_401(c_pushingababycarriage,c_tptpcol_16_10258)*.
% 0.18/0.43  55[0:Inp] || tptptypes_6_388(u,v)+ -> tptptypes_5_387(u,v)*.
% 0.18/0.43  56[0:Inp] || tptptypes_7_396(u,v)+ -> tptptypes_6_388(u,v)*.
% 0.18/0.43  57[0:Inp] || tptptypes_8_400(u,v)+ -> tptptypes_7_396(u,v)*.
% 0.18/0.43  58[0:Inp] || tptptypes_9_401(u,v)+ -> tptptypes_8_400(v,u)*.
% 0.18/0.43  60[0:Inp] mtvisible(u) || genlmt(u,v)* -> mtvisible(v)*.
% 0.18/0.43  70[0:Res:1.0,60.0] || genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,u)+ -> mtvisible(u)*.
% 0.18/0.43  71[0:Res:55.1,17.0] || tptptypes_6_388(u,c_pushingababycarriage)*+ -> .
% 0.18/0.43  118[0:Res:14.0,70.0] ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptp_member237_mt)*.
% 0.18/0.43  127[0:MRR:18.0,118.0] ||  -> tptptypes_9_401(c_pushingababycarriage,c_tptpcol_16_10258)*.
% 0.18/0.43  129[0:Res:127.0,58.0] ||  -> tptptypes_8_400(c_tptpcol_16_10258,c_pushingababycarriage)*.
% 0.18/0.43  132[0:Res:129.0,57.0] ||  -> tptptypes_7_396(c_tptpcol_16_10258,c_pushingababycarriage)*.
% 0.18/0.43  135[0:Res:132.0,56.0] ||  -> tptptypes_6_388(c_tptpcol_16_10258,c_pushingababycarriage)*.
% 0.18/0.43  138[0:MRR:135.0,71.0] ||  -> .
% 0.18/0.43  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.18/0.43  Formulae used in the proof : query73 just15 just18 just7 just9 just11 just13 just59
% 0.18/0.43  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------