TSTP Solution File: CSR072+2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : CSR072+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:21:53 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.50s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR072+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 18:10:34 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.50 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.21/0.50 The process was started by sandbox2 on n026.cluster.edu,
% 0.21/0.50 Sat Jun 11 18:10:34 2022
% 0.21/0.50 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 23857.
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.21/0.50 set(auto).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.21/0.50 clear(print_given).
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 formula_list(usable).
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.21/0.50 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.21/0.50 in usable.
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 ------------> process usable:
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 194 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -few(A,B)|setorcollection(B).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 194 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -few(A,B)|setorcollection(B).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 313 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -few(A,B)|setorcollection(A).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 347 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -arg2isa(A,B)| -genls(B,C)|arg2isa(A,C).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 395 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -arg1isa(A,B)| -genls(B,C)|arg1isa(A,C).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 419 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -no(A,B)| -subsetof(C,A)|no(C,B).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 418 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -no(A,B)| -subsetof(C,B)|no(A,C).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 713 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -most(A,B)|setorcollection(B).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 119 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -most(A,B)|setorcollection(A).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 119 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -most(A,B)|setorcollection(A).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 714 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -setorcollection(A)|most(A,A).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 715 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -most(A,B)| -subsetof(B,C)|most(A,C).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 718 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -subsetof(A,B)| -subsetof(C,A)|subsetof(C,B).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 718 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -subsetof(A,B)| -subsetof(B,C)|subsetof(A,C).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 718 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -subsetof(A,B)| -subsetof(B,C)|subsetof(A,C).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 720 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlpreds(A,B)|predicate(B).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 721 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlpreds(A,B)|predicate(A).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 723 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -predicate(A)|genlpreds(A,A).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 730 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -isa(A,B)|collection(B).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 731 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -isa(A,B)|thing(A).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 743 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genls(A,B)|collection(B).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 105 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genls(A,B)|collection(A).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 105 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genls(A,B)|collection(A).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 745 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -collection(A)|genls(A,A).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 744 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genls(A,B)| -genls(C,A)|genls(C,B).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 744 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genls(A,B)| -genls(B,C)|genls(A,C).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 134 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -disjointwith(A,B)|collection(B).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 755 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlmt(A,B)|microtheory(B).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 756 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlmt(A,B)|microtheory(A).
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 758 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -microtheory(A)|genlmt(A,A).
% 0.21/0.50 731 back subsumes 596.
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 -----
% 0.21/0.50 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.21/0.50 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.50 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.50 -------> process sos:
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.09 sec ----> 936 [binary,935.1,759.1] {-} $F.
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 Length of proof is 0. Level of proof is 0.
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.21/0.50 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.50 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 759 [] {-} -genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923).
% 0.21/0.50 935 [] {-} genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923).
% 0.21/0.50 936 [binary,935.1,759.1] {-} $F.
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.21/0.50 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 ============ end of search ============
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 Process 23857 finished Sat Jun 11 18:10:34 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------