TSTP Solution File: CSR071+5 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR071+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:24 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 20.27s 12.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 20.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   22 (  11 unt;   0 nHn;  22 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   37 (   0 equ;  20 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2740,negated_conjecture,
    ~ tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-id2qgioa/input.p',i_0_2740) ).

cnf(i_0_686,plain,
    ( tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414))
    | ~ militaryperson(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-id2qgioa/input.p',i_0_686) ).

cnf(i_0_987,plain,
    ( militaryperson(X1)
    | ~ navypersonnel(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-id2qgioa/input.p',i_0_987) ).

cnf(i_0_35,plain,
    ( navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-id2qgioa/input.p',i_0_35) ).

cnf(i_0_2347,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-id2qgioa/input.p',i_0_2347) ).

cnf(i_0_187,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member1672_mt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-id2qgioa/input.p',i_0_187) ).

cnf(i_0_2741,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-id2qgioa/input.p',i_0_2741) ).

cnf(i_0_831,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member698_mt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-id2qgioa/input.p',i_0_831) ).

cnf(c_0_2750,negated_conjecture,
    ~ tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)),
    i_0_2740 ).

cnf(c_0_2751,plain,
    ( tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414))
    | ~ militaryperson(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt) ),
    i_0_686 ).

cnf(c_0_2752,plain,
    ( militaryperson(X1)
    | ~ navypersonnel(X1) ),
    i_0_987 ).

cnf(c_0_2753,plain,
    ( navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt) ),
    i_0_35 ).

cnf(c_0_2754,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ militaryperson(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2750,c_0_2751]) ).

cnf(c_0_2755,plain,
    ( militaryperson(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2752,c_0_2753]) ).

cnf(c_0_2756,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_2347 ).

cnf(c_0_2757,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member1672_mt),
    i_0_187 ).

cnf(c_0_2758,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
    i_0_2741 ).

cnf(c_0_2759,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2754,c_0_2755]) ).

cnf(c_0_2760,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2756,c_0_2757]),c_0_2758])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2761,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member698_mt),
    i_0_831 ).

cnf(c_0_2762,plain,
    ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2759,c_0_2760])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2763,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2756,c_0_2761]),c_0_2758])]),c_0_2762]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : CSR071+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 17:26:35 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 9.23/9.41  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.23/9.41  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 9.23/9.41  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 9.23/9.41  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 20.27/12.58  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 20.27/12.58  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 20.27/12.58  # Preprocessing time       : 0.084 s
% 20.27/12.58  
% 20.27/12.58  # Proof found!
% 20.27/12.58  # SZS status Theorem
% 20.27/12.58  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 20.27/12.58  # Proof object total steps             : 22
% 20.27/12.58  # Proof object clause steps            : 14
% 20.27/12.58  # Proof object formula steps           : 8
% 20.27/12.58  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 20.27/12.58  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 3
% 20.27/12.58  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 2
% 20.27/12.58  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 8
% 20.27/12.58  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 8
% 20.27/12.58  # Proof object generating inferences   : 5
% 20.27/12.58  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 7
% 20.27/12.58  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 20.27/12.58  # Parsed axioms                        : 2739
% 20.27/12.58  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 20.27/12.58  # Initial clauses                      : 2739
% 20.27/12.58  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 20.27/12.58  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 2739
% 20.27/12.58  # Processed clauses                    : 2798
% 20.27/12.58  # ...of these trivial                  : 190
% 20.27/12.58  # ...subsumed                          : 59
% 20.27/12.58  # ...remaining for further processing  : 2548
% 20.27/12.58  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 5
% 20.27/12.58  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 20.27/12.58  # Backward-subsumed                    : 5
% 20.27/12.58  # Backward-rewritten                   : 85
% 20.27/12.58  # Generated clauses                    : 3761
% 20.27/12.58  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 3385
% 20.27/12.58  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 4
% 20.27/12.58  # Paramodulations                      : 3756
% 20.27/12.58  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 20.27/12.58  # Equation resolutions                 : 5
% 20.27/12.58  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 20.27/12.58  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 20.27/12.58  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2453
% 20.27/12.58  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1401
% 20.27/12.58  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 20.27/12.58  #    Negative unit clauses             : 37
% 20.27/12.58  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1015
% 20.27/12.58  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2877
% 20.27/12.58  # ...number of literals in the above   : 4489
% 20.27/12.58  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 20.27/12.58  # Current number of archived clauses   : 90
% 20.27/12.58  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 136582
% 20.27/12.58  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 107119
% 20.27/12.58  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 63
% 20.27/12.58  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27909
% 20.27/12.58  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 20.27/12.58  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 585
% 20.27/12.58  # BW rewrite match successes           : 68
% 20.27/12.58  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 20.27/12.58  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 20.27/12.58  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 72069
% 20.27/12.58  
% 20.27/12.58  # -------------------------------------------------
% 20.27/12.58  # User time                : 0.210 s
% 20.27/12.58  # System time              : 0.018 s
% 20.27/12.58  # Total time               : 0.228 s
% 20.27/12.58  # ...preprocessing         : 0.084 s
% 20.27/12.58  # ...main loop             : 0.144 s
% 20.27/12.58  # Maximum resident set size: 23056 pages
% 20.27/12.58  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------