TSTP Solution File: CSR071+4 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR071+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:18:03 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 1.64s 1.23s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.64s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 51 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 45 ( 21 ~; 15 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query221,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query221) ).
fof(ax3_13721,axiom,
! [X6] :
( ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt)
& militaryperson(X6) )
=> tptpofobject(X6,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_13721) ).
fof(ax3_14292,axiom,
! [X1] :
( navypersonnel(X1)
=> militaryperson(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_14292) ).
fof(ax3_790,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt)
=> navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_790) ).
fof(ax3_44208,axiom,
! [X22,X23] :
( ( mtvisible(X22)
& genlmt(X22,X23) )
=> mtvisible(X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_44208) ).
fof(ax3_1540,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member698_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_1540) ).
fof(ax3_303,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member1672_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_303) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query221]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
& ~ tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X28] :
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt)
| ~ militaryperson(X28)
| tptpofobject(X28,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_13721])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X69] :
( ~ navypersonnel(X69)
| militaryperson(X69) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_14292])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt)
| navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_790])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414))
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt)
| ~ militaryperson(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( militaryperson(X1)
| ~ navypersonnel(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X30,X31] :
( ~ mtvisible(X30)
| ~ genlmt(X30,X31)
| mtvisible(X31) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_44208])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ~ militaryperson(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( militaryperson(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( mtvisible(X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member698_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_1540]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member1672_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_303]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_24]),c_0_21])]),c_0_25]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR071+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 01:13:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.64/1.23 # Version: 3.1.0
% 1.64/1.23 # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.64/1.23 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.64/1.23 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.64/1.23 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.64/1.23 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.64/1.23 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.64/1.23 # new_bool_3 with pid 3964 completed with status 0
% 1.64/1.23 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 1.64/1.23 # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.64/1.23 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.64/1.23 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.64/1.23 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.64/1.23 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.64/1.23 # Search class: FHHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 1.64/1.23 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 1.64/1.23 # Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.64/1.23 # Starting G-E--_208_B07----S_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 28s (1) cores
% 1.64/1.23 # G-E--_208_B07----S_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3967 completed with status 0
% 1.64/1.23 # Result found by G-E--_208_B07----S_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.64/1.23 # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.64/1.23 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.64/1.23 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.64/1.23 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.64/1.23 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.64/1.23 # Search class: FHHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 1.64/1.23 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 1.64/1.23 # Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.64/1.23 # Starting G-E--_208_B07----S_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 28s (1) cores
% 1.64/1.23 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 1.64/1.23 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.64/1.23
% 1.64/1.23 # Proof found!
% 1.64/1.23 # SZS status Theorem
% 1.64/1.23 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.64/1.23 # Parsed axioms : 44217
% 1.64/1.23 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 44137
% 1.64/1.23 # Initial clauses : 81
% 1.64/1.23 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 1.64/1.23 # Initial clauses in saturation : 80
% 1.64/1.23 # Processed clauses : 137
% 1.64/1.23 # ...of these trivial : 8
% 1.64/1.23 # ...subsumed : 12
% 1.64/1.23 # ...remaining for further processing : 116
% 1.64/1.23 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 1.64/1.23 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.64/1.23 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 1.64/1.23 # Backward-rewritten : 5
% 1.64/1.23 # Generated clauses : 22
% 1.64/1.23 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 19
% 1.64/1.23 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.64/1.23 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.64/1.23 # Paramodulations : 21
% 1.64/1.23 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.64/1.23 # NegExts : 0
% 1.64/1.23 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 1.64/1.23 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.64/1.23 # Total rewrite steps : 21
% 1.64/1.23 # ...of those cached : 12
% 1.64/1.23 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.64/1.23 # Propositional check models : 0
% 1.64/1.23 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.64/1.23 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.64/1.23 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.64/1.23 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.64/1.23 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.64/1.23 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.64/1.23 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.64/1.23 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.64/1.23 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.64/1.23 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.64/1.23 # Current number of processed clauses : 48
% 1.64/1.23 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 27
% 1.64/1.23 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.64/1.23 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 1.64/1.23 # Non-unit-clauses : 17
% 1.64/1.23 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 22
% 1.64/1.23 # ...number of literals in the above : 29
% 1.64/1.23 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.64/1.23 # Current number of archived clauses : 67
% 1.64/1.23 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 206
% 1.64/1.23 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 185
% 1.64/1.23 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 12
% 1.64/1.23 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 55
% 1.64/1.23 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.64/1.23 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 1.64/1.23 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 1.64/1.23 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.64/1.23 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.64/1.23 # Termbank termtop insertions : 294976
% 1.64/1.23 # Search garbage collected termcells : 157719
% 1.64/1.23
% 1.64/1.23 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.64/1.23 # User time : 0.168 s
% 1.64/1.23 # System time : 0.079 s
% 1.64/1.23 # Total time : 0.247 s
% 1.64/1.23 # Maximum resident set size: 81076 pages
% 1.64/1.23
% 1.64/1.23 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.64/1.23 # User time : 0.610 s
% 1.64/1.23 # System time : 0.113 s
% 1.64/1.23 # Total time : 0.723 s
% 1.64/1.23 # Maximum resident set size: 33956 pages
% 1.64/1.23 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------