TSTP Solution File: CSR071+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR071+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:10 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 49 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 40 ( 18 ~; 13 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query121,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query121) ).
fof(ax1_1123,axiom,
! [X20,X21] :
( ( mtvisible(X20)
& genlmt(X20,X21) )
=> mtvisible(X21) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_1123) ).
fof(ax1_495,axiom,
! [X10] :
( ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt)
& militaryperson(X10) )
=> tptpofobject(X10,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_495) ).
fof(ax1_91,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt)
=> navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_91) ).
fof(ax1_453,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member1672_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_453) ).
fof(ax1_448,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member698_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_448) ).
fof(ax1_284,axiom,
! [X1] :
( navypersonnel(X1)
=> militaryperson(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_284) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query121]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X22,X23] :
( ~ mtvisible(X22)
| ~ genlmt(X22,X23)
| mtvisible(X23) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_1123])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
& ~ tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X11] :
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt)
| ~ militaryperson(X11)
| tptpofobject(X11,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_495])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt)
| navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_91]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member1672_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_453]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414))
| ~ militaryperson(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member698_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_448]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ navypersonnel(X2)
| militaryperson(X2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_284])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( ~ militaryperson(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_17]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( militaryperson(X1)
| ~ navypersonnel(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ militaryperson(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : CSR071+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 02:04:48 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.033 s
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 27
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 14
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 13
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 8
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 7
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 9
% 0.24/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1059
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses : 74
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 74
% 0.24/1.42 # Processed clauses : 87
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # ...subsumed : 13
% 0.24/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 73
% 0.24/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.24/1.42 # Generated clauses : 38
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 33
% 0.24/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Paramodulations : 38
% 0.24/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 68
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 32
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 32
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 15
% 0.24/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 22
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.24/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 181
% 0.24/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 171
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 11
% 0.24/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 31
% 0.24/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10531
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.42 # User time : 0.030 s
% 0.24/1.42 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Total time : 0.036 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 5476 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------