TSTP Solution File: CSR069+3 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : CSR069+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 07:32:05 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 1.63s 1.70s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   15 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   11 (   5   ~;   2   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn   0   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query169,conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
   => borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gLg3wGDZs1/E---3.1_15602.p',query169) ).

fof(ax2_532,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
   => borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gLg3wGDZs1/E---3.1_15602.p',ax2_532) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
     => borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query169]) ).

fof(c_0_3,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
    | borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_532])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
    & ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),c_0_7]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.77/0.80  % Problem    : CSR069+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.77/0.81  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.81/1.01  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.81/1.01  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.81/1.01  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.81/1.01  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.81/1.01  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.81/1.02  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.81/1.02  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.81/1.02  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 14:43:53 EDT 2024
% 0.81/1.02  % CPUTime    : 
% 1.35/1.59  Running first-order theorem proving
% 1.35/1.59  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gLg3wGDZs1/E---3.1_15602.p
% 1.63/1.70  # Version: 3.1.0
% 1.63/1.70  # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.63/1.70  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.63/1.70  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.63/1.70  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.63/1.70  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.63/1.70  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.63/1.70  # new_bool_3 with pid 15906 completed with status 0
% 1.63/1.70  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 1.63/1.70  # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.63/1.70  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.63/1.70  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.63/1.70  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.63/1.70  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.63/1.70  # Search class: FHUNF-FFSM11-SFFFFFNN
% 1.63/1.70  # partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 1.63/1.70  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.63/1.70  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 1.63/1.70  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 15913 completed with status 0
% 1.63/1.70  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 1.63/1.70  # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.63/1.70  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.63/1.70  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.63/1.70  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.63/1.70  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.63/1.70  # Search class: FHUNF-FFSM11-SFFFFFNN
% 1.63/1.70  # partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 1.63/1.70  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.63/1.70  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 1.63/1.70  # Preprocessing time       : 0.005 s
% 1.63/1.70  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.63/1.70  
% 1.63/1.70  # Proof found!
% 1.63/1.70  # SZS status Theorem
% 1.63/1.70  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.63/1.70  # Parsed axioms                        : 8006
% 1.63/1.70  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 7962
% 1.63/1.70  # Initial clauses                      : 45
% 1.63/1.70  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 45
% 1.63/1.70  # Processed clauses                    : 3
% 1.63/1.70  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # ...remaining for further processing  : 2
% 1.63/1.70  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # NegExts                              : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 1.63/1.70  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.63/1.70  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.63/1.70  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.63/1.70  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.63/1.70  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.63/1.70  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.63/1.70  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.63/1.70  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.63/1.70  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.63/1.70  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.63/1.70  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.63/1.70  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.63/1.70  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2
% 1.63/1.70  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 1.63/1.70  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.63/1.70  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 1.63/1.70  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 42
% 1.63/1.70  # ...number of literals in the above   : 63
% 1.63/1.70  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.63/1.70  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 52132
% 1.63/1.70  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 31075
% 1.63/1.70  
% 1.63/1.70  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.63/1.70  # User time                : 0.028 s
% 1.63/1.70  # System time              : 0.016 s
% 1.63/1.70  # Total time               : 0.044 s
% 1.63/1.70  # Maximum resident set size: 18208 pages
% 1.63/1.70  
% 1.63/1.70  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.63/1.70  # User time                : 0.076 s
% 1.63/1.70  # System time              : 0.022 s
% 1.63/1.70  # Total time               : 0.097 s
% 1.63/1.70  # Maximum resident set size: 8068 pages
% 1.63/1.70  % E---3.1 exiting
% 1.63/1.70  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------