TSTP Solution File: CSR068+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : CSR068+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:24:58 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.46s
% Output : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.14/0.14 % Problem : CSR068+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.14/0.14 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 12:25:09 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.46
% 0.22/0.46 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.22/0.46 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.22/0.46 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.46 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.46 SPASS derived 14 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 59 clauses.
% 0.22/0.46 SPASS allocated 97706 KBytes.
% 0.22/0.46 SPASS spent 0:00:00.09 on the problem.
% 0.22/0.46 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.22/0.46 0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.22/0.46 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.22/0.46 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.22/0.46 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.22/0.46
% 0.22/0.46
% 0.22/0.46 Here is a proof with depth 2, length 11 :
% 0.22/0.46 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.22/0.46 1[0:Inp] || -> mtvisible(c_tptp_member2356_mt)*.
% 0.22/0.46 3[0:Inp] || -> furpelt(c_theprototypicalfurpelt)*.
% 0.22/0.46 11[0:Inp] || -> genlmt(c_tptp_member2356_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*r.
% 0.22/0.46 14[0:Inp] || tptpofobject(c_theprototypicalfurpelt,f_tptpquantityfn_1(n_328))* -> .
% 0.22/0.46 47[0:Inp] mtvisible(u) || genlmt(u,v)* -> mtvisible(v)*.
% 0.22/0.46 48[0:Inp] furpelt(u) || mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt) -> tptpofobject(u,f_tptpquantityfn_1(n_328))*.
% 0.22/0.46 58[0:Res:1.0,47.0] || genlmt(c_tptp_member2356_mt,u) -> mtvisible(u)*.
% 0.22/0.46 59[0:Res:48.2,14.0] furpelt(c_theprototypicalfurpelt) || mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)* -> .
% 0.22/0.46 60[0:MRR:59.0,3.0] || mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)* -> .
% 0.22/0.46 97[0:Res:58.1,60.0] || genlmt(c_tptp_member2356_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*r -> .
% 0.22/0.46 98[0:MRR:97.0,11.0] || -> .
% 0.22/0.46 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.22/0.46 Formulae used in the proof : query68 just8 just7 just47 just9
% 0.22/0.46
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------