TSTP Solution File: CSR067+3 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR067+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:07 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.82s 2.01s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.82s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 16 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 1 sgn 5 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query167,conjecture,
? [X3] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> borderson(X3,c_georegion_l4_x29_y75) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query167) ).
fof(ax2_527,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x29_y75,c_georegion_l4_x29_y76) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_527) ).
fof(ax2_7642,axiom,
! [X15,X16] :
( borderson(X15,X16)
=> borderson(X16,X15) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7642) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X3] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> borderson(X3,c_georegion_l4_x29_y75) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query167]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x29_y75,c_georegion_l4_x29_y76) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_527]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X4] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
& ~ borderson(X4,c_georegion_l4_x29_y75) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X17,X18] :
( ~ borderson(X17,X18)
| borderson(X18,X17) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7642])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x29_y75,c_georegion_l4_x29_y76)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( borderson(X1,X2)
| ~ borderson(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
borderson(c_georegion_l4_x29_y75,c_georegion_l4_x29_y76),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(X1,c_georegion_l4_x29_y75),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : CSR067+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 02:15:58 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.82/2.01 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.82/2.01 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.82/2.01 # Preprocessing time : 0.149 s
% 0.82/2.01
% 0.82/2.01 # Proof found!
% 0.82/2.01 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.82/2.01 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.82/2.01 # Proof object total steps : 13
% 0.82/2.01 # Proof object clause steps : 6
% 0.82/2.01 # Proof object formula steps : 7
% 0.82/2.01 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.82/2.01 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.82/2.01 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.82/2.01 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.82/2.01 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 0.82/2.01 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 0.82/2.01 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 0.82/2.01 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.82/2.01 # Parsed axioms : 8006
% 0.82/2.01 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7984
% 0.82/2.01 # Initial clauses : 23
% 0.82/2.01 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.82/2.01 # Initial clauses in saturation : 23
% 0.82/2.01 # Processed clauses : 13
% 0.82/2.01 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.82/2.01 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.82/2.01 # ...remaining for further processing : 12
% 0.82/2.01 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.82/2.01 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.82/2.01 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.82/2.01 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.82/2.01 # Generated clauses : 3
% 0.82/2.01 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 2
% 0.82/2.01 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.82/2.01 # Paramodulations : 3
% 0.82/2.01 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.82/2.01 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.82/2.01 # Current number of processed clauses : 12
% 0.82/2.01 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.82/2.01 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.82/2.01 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.82/2.01 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.82/2.01 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12
% 0.82/2.01 # ...number of literals in the above : 25
% 0.82/2.01 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.82/2.01 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.82/2.01 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.82/2.01 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.82/2.01 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.82/2.01 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.82/2.01 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.82/2.01 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.82/2.01 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.82/2.01 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.82/2.01 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.82/2.01 # Termbank termtop insertions : 51720
% 0.82/2.01
% 0.82/2.01 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.82/2.01 # User time : 0.130 s
% 0.82/2.01 # System time : 0.020 s
% 0.82/2.01 # Total time : 0.150 s
% 0.82/2.01 # Maximum resident set size: 19676 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------