TSTP Solution File: CSR067+3 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR067+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:13:59 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.46s 0.64s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 16 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 1 sgn 5 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query167,conjecture,
? [X3] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> borderson(X3,c_georegion_l4_x29_y75) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query167) ).
fof(ax2_527,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x29_y75,c_georegion_l4_x29_y76) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_527) ).
fof(ax2_7642,axiom,
! [X15,X16] :
( borderson(X15,X16)
=> borderson(X16,X15) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7642) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X3] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> borderson(X3,c_georegion_l4_x29_y75) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query167]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x29_y75,c_georegion_l4_x29_y76) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_527])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X23] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
& ~ borderson(X23,c_georegion_l4_x29_y75) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X28,X29] :
( ~ borderson(X28,X29)
| borderson(X29,X28) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7642])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x29_y75,c_georegion_l4_x29_y76)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( borderson(X2,X1)
| ~ borderson(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
borderson(c_georegion_l4_x29_y75,c_georegion_l4_x29_y76),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(X1,c_georegion_l4_x29_y75),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : CSR067+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 00:39:08 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/0.64 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.46/0.64 # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.46/0.64 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.46/0.64 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.46/0.64 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.64 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.64 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.64 # new_bool_3 with pid 18853 completed with status 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.46/0.64 # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.46/0.64 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.46/0.64 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.46/0.64 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.64 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.46/0.64 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.46/0.64 # partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.46/0.64 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.46/0.64 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.64 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 18856 completed with status 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.46/0.64 # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.46/0.64 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.46/0.64 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.46/0.64 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.64 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.46/0.64 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.46/0.64 # partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.46/0.64 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.46/0.64 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.64 # Preprocessing time : 0.006 s
% 0.46/0.64 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.46/0.64
% 0.46/0.64 # Proof found!
% 0.46/0.64 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.46/0.64 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.46/0.64 # Parsed axioms : 8006
% 0.46/0.64 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7980
% 0.46/0.64 # Initial clauses : 27
% 0.46/0.64 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Initial clauses in saturation : 27
% 0.46/0.64 # Processed clauses : 47
% 0.46/0.64 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.46/0.64 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.46/0.64 # ...remaining for further processing : 44
% 0.46/0.64 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Generated clauses : 5
% 0.46/0.64 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.46/0.64 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Paramodulations : 5
% 0.46/0.64 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.46/0.64 # NegExts : 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Total rewrite steps : 7
% 0.46/0.64 # ...of those cached : 3
% 0.46/0.64 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.64 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.64 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.64 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.64 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.64 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.64 # Current number of processed clauses : 20
% 0.46/0.64 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.46/0.64 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.46/0.64 # Non-unit-clauses : 10
% 0.46/0.64 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
% 0.46/0.64 # ...number of literals in the above : 14
% 0.46/0.64 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Current number of archived clauses : 24
% 0.46/0.64 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 31
% 0.46/0.64 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 23
% 0.46/0.64 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.46/0.64 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.46/0.64 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.46/0.64 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.46/0.64 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.46/0.64 # Termbank termtop insertions : 52130
% 0.46/0.64 # Search garbage collected termcells : 31117
% 0.46/0.64
% 0.46/0.64 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.64 # User time : 0.025 s
% 0.46/0.64 # System time : 0.024 s
% 0.46/0.64 # Total time : 0.049 s
% 0.46/0.64 # Maximum resident set size: 18128 pages
% 0.46/0.64
% 0.46/0.64 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.64 # User time : 0.127 s
% 0.46/0.64 # System time : 0.033 s
% 0.46/0.64 # Total time : 0.159 s
% 0.46/0.64 # Maximum resident set size: 7956 pages
% 0.46/0.64 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.46/0.64 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------