TSTP Solution File: CSR065+3 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR065+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:17:56 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 4.97s 1.34s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.97s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 47 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 35 ( 15 ~; 12 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query165,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query165) ).
fof(ax2_7997,axiom,
! [X21,X22] :
( ( mtvisible(X21)
& genlmt(X21,X22) )
=> mtvisible(X22) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7997) ).
fof(ax2_142,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3633_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_142) ).
fof(ax2_279,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member235_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_279) ).
fof(ax2_2882,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member3633_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_2882) ).
fof(ax2_4288,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_4288) ).
fof(ax2_3571,axiom,
! [X2] :
( ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt)
& ridgeline_topographical(X2) )
=> tptpofobject(X2,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_3571) ).
fof(ax2_737,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
=> ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_737) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query165]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X5978,X5979] :
( ~ mtvisible(X5978)
| ~ genlmt(X5978,X5979)
| mtvisible(X5979) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7997])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
& ~ tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( mtvisible(X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3633_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_142]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member235_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_279]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member3633_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_2882]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_4288]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X1073] :
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt)
| ~ ridgeline_topographical(X1073)
| tptpofobject(X1073,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_3571])])]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
| ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_737])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member3633_mt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member3633_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_15]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468))
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt)
| ~ ridgeline_topographical(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical)
| ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
$false,
inference(cdclpropres,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20,c_0_21,c_0_22,c_0_23,c_0_24,c_0_25]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : CSR065+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 01:29:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.97/1.34 # Version: 3.1.0
% 4.97/1.34 # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 4.97/1.34 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.97/1.34 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.97/1.34 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.97/1.34 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.97/1.34 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 4.97/1.34 # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 32154 completed with status 0
% 4.97/1.34 # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 4.97/1.34 # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 4.97/1.34 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.97/1.34 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.97/1.34 # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.97/1.34 # Search class: FHHNM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 4.97/1.34 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 4.97/1.34 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 901s (1) cores
% 4.97/1.34 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 4.97/1.34 # Starting new_bool_3 with 151s (1) cores
% 4.97/1.34 # Starting new_bool_1 with 151s (1) cores
% 4.97/1.34 # Starting sh5l with 146s (1) cores
% 4.97/1.34 # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 32166 completed with status 0
% 4.97/1.34 # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 4.97/1.34 # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 4.97/1.34 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.97/1.34 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.97/1.34 # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.97/1.34 # Search class: FHHNM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 4.97/1.34 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 4.97/1.34 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 901s (1) cores
% 4.97/1.34 # Preprocessing time : 0.098 s
% 4.97/1.34 # SatCheck found unsatisfiable ground set
% 4.97/1.34
% 4.97/1.34 # Proof found!
% 4.97/1.34 # SZS status Theorem
% 4.97/1.34 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.97/1.34 # Parsed axioms : 8006
% 4.97/1.34 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 4.97/1.34 # Initial clauses : 8007
% 4.97/1.34 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 4.97/1.34 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8007
% 4.97/1.34 # Processed clauses : 5621
% 4.97/1.34 # ...of these trivial : 318
% 4.97/1.34 # ...subsumed : 303
% 4.97/1.34 # ...remaining for further processing : 5000
% 4.97/1.34 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 4.97/1.34 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 4.97/1.34 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 4.97/1.34 # Backward-rewritten : 23
% 4.97/1.34 # Generated clauses : 14042
% 4.97/1.34 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 13491
% 4.97/1.34 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 4.97/1.34 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 4.97/1.34 # Paramodulations : 14042
% 4.97/1.34 # Factorizations : 0
% 4.97/1.34 # NegExts : 0
% 4.97/1.34 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 4.97/1.34 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 4.97/1.34 # Total rewrite steps : 749
% 4.97/1.34 # ...of those cached : 317
% 4.97/1.34 # Propositional unsat checks : 1
% 4.97/1.34 # Propositional check models : 0
% 4.97/1.34 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 1
% 4.97/1.34 # Propositional clauses : 20854
% 4.97/1.34 # Propositional clauses after purity: 6023
% 4.97/1.34 # Propositional unsat core size : 7
% 4.97/1.34 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 4.97/1.34 # Propositional encoding time : 0.015
% 4.97/1.34 # Propositional solver time : 0.004
% 4.97/1.34 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 4.97/1.34 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.015
% 4.97/1.34 # Success case prop solver time : 0.004
% 4.97/1.34 # Current number of processed clauses : 4977
% 4.97/1.34 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2368
% 4.97/1.34 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 4.97/1.34 # Negative unit clauses : 33
% 4.97/1.34 # Non-unit-clauses : 2576
% 4.97/1.34 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 15877
% 4.97/1.34 # ...number of literals in the above : 27614
% 4.97/1.34 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 4.97/1.34 # Current number of archived clauses : 23
% 4.97/1.34 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1124915
% 4.97/1.34 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1004194
% 4.97/1.34 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 303
% 4.97/1.34 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14473
% 4.97/1.34 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 4.97/1.34 # BW rewrite match attempts : 138
% 4.97/1.34 # BW rewrite match successes : 23
% 4.97/1.34 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 4.97/1.34 # Condensation successes : 0
% 4.97/1.34 # Termbank termtop insertions : 450988
% 4.97/1.34 # Search garbage collected termcells : 41047
% 4.97/1.34
% 4.97/1.34 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.97/1.34 # User time : 0.672 s
% 4.97/1.34 # System time : 0.063 s
% 4.97/1.34 # Total time : 0.735 s
% 4.97/1.34 # Maximum resident set size: 22076 pages
% 4.97/1.34
% 4.97/1.34 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.97/1.34 # User time : 2.603 s
% 4.97/1.34 # System time : 0.172 s
% 4.97/1.34 # Total time : 2.776 s
% 4.97/1.34 # Maximum resident set size: 7956 pages
% 4.97/1.34 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------