TSTP Solution File: CSR065+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : CSR065+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:33:21 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.51s 0.74s
% Output : Refutation 0.51s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 33 ( 17 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 58 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 46 ( 21 ~; 15 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f99,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f98,f95]) ).
fof(f95,plain,
~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f92,f79]) ).
fof(f79,plain,
( ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical)
| ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f68]) ).
fof(f68,plain,
( ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical)
| ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
fof(f9,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
=> ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just9) ).
fof(f92,plain,
~ ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f91,f90]) ).
fof(f90,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f78,f73,f75]) ).
fof(f75,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ genlmt(X0,X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X0)
| mtvisible(X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f65]) ).
fof(f65,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X0,X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f64]) ).
fof(f64,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X0,X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f59]) ).
fof(f59,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( genlmt(X0,X1)
& mtvisible(X0) )
=> mtvisible(X1) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f48]) ).
fof(f48,axiom,
! [X15,X16] :
( ( genlmt(X15,X16)
& mtvisible(X15) )
=> mtvisible(X16) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just48) ).
fof(f73,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f63]) ).
fof(f63,plain,
( ~ tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468))
& mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f58]) ).
fof(f58,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f57]) ).
fof(f57,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query65) ).
fof(f78,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member235_mt),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member235_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just6) ).
fof(f91,plain,
( ~ ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f74,f76]) ).
fof(f76,plain,
! [X0] :
( tptpofobject(X0,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468))
| ~ ridgeline_topographical(X0)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f67]) ).
fof(f67,plain,
! [X0] :
( tptpofobject(X0,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468))
| ~ ridgeline_topographical(X0)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f66]) ).
fof(f66,plain,
! [X0] :
( tptpofobject(X0,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468))
| ~ ridgeline_topographical(X0)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).
fof(f10,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ( ridgeline_topographical(X0)
& mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt) )
=> tptpofobject(X0,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just10) ).
fof(f74,plain,
~ tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f63]) ).
fof(f98,plain,
mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f84,f93,f75]) ).
fof(f93,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f83,f89,f75]) ).
fof(f89,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member3993_mt),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f77,f73,f75]) ).
fof(f77,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member3993_mt),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member3993_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just8) ).
fof(f83,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3993_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3993_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just7) ).
fof(f84,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just5) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.13 % Problem : CSR065+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.09/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.10/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 00:26:53 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.34 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ problem
% 0.10/0.34 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.51/0.74 % (13068)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.51/0.74 % (13064)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.51/0.74 % (13067)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.51/0.74 % (13066)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.51/0.74 % (13065)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.51/0.74 % (13069)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.51/0.74 % (13070)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.51/0.74 % (13071)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.51/0.74 % (13064)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (13064)------------------------------
% 0.51/0.74 % (13064)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.51/0.74 % (13068)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (13068)------------------------------
% 0.51/0.74 % (13068)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.51/0.74 % (13064)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.51/0.74
% 0.51/0.74 % (13064)Memory used [KB]: 976
% 0.51/0.74 % (13064)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.51/0.74 % (13064)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.51/0.74 % (13068)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.51/0.74 % (13070)First to succeed.
% 0.51/0.74 % (13069)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (13069)------------------------------
% 0.51/0.74 % (13069)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.51/0.74 % (13069)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.51/0.74
% 0.51/0.74 % (13069)Memory used [KB]: 965
% 0.51/0.74 % (13069)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.51/0.74 % (13069)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.51/0.74
% 0.51/0.74 % (13068)Memory used [KB]: 1042
% 0.51/0.74 % (13067)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (13067)------------------------------
% 0.51/0.74 % (13067)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.51/0.74 % (13067)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.51/0.74
% 0.51/0.74 % (13067)Memory used [KB]: 1053
% 0.51/0.74 % (13067)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.51/0.74 % (13067)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.51/0.74 % (13068)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.51/0.74 % (13068)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.51/0.74 % (13064)------------------------------
% 0.51/0.74 % (13064)------------------------------
% 0.51/0.74 % (13069)------------------------------
% 0.51/0.74 % (13069)------------------------------
% 0.51/0.74 % (13067)------------------------------
% 0.51/0.74 % (13067)------------------------------
% 0.51/0.74 % (13066)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.51/0.74 % (13068)------------------------------
% 0.51/0.74 % (13068)------------------------------
% 0.51/0.74 % (13070)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-13063"
% 0.51/0.74 % (13065)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.51/0.74 % (13070)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.51/0.74 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.51/0.74 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.51/0.74 % (13070)------------------------------
% 0.51/0.74 % (13070)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.51/0.74 % (13070)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.51/0.74
% 0.51/0.74 % (13070)Memory used [KB]: 1040
% 0.51/0.74 % (13070)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.51/0.74 % (13070)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.51/0.74 % (13063)Success in time 0.393 s
% 0.51/0.74 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------