TSTP Solution File: CSR065+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR065+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 29 ( 16 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 48 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 36 ( 17 ~; 11 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query65,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query65) ).
fof(just48,axiom,
! [X16,X17] :
( ( mtvisible(X16)
& genlmt(X16,X17) )
=> mtvisible(X17) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just48) ).
fof(just10,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt)
& ridgeline_topographical(X1) )
=> tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just10) ).
fof(just6,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member235_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just6) ).
fof(just9,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
=> ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just9) ).
fof(just8,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member3993_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just8) ).
fof(just5,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just5) ).
fof(just7,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3993_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just7) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query65]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X18,X19] :
( ~ mtvisible(X18)
| ~ genlmt(X18,X19)
| mtvisible(X19) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just48])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
& ~ tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt)
| ~ ridgeline_topographical(X2)
| tptpofobject(X2,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member235_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just6]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468))
| ~ ridgeline_topographical(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468))
| ~ ridgeline_topographical(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
| ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just9]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical)
| ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member3993_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just8]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just5]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3993_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just7]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member3993_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_22]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
~ mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_23]),c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),c_0_27]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR065+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 20:09:33 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.23/1.41 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.23/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 57
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 49
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses : 9
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 9
% 0.23/1.41 # Processed clauses : 15
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 15
% 0.23/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Generated clauses : 8
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 7
% 0.23/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Paramodulations : 8
% 0.23/1.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 14
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 8
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 858
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.41 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.23/1.41 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 2760 pages
% 0.23/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object total steps : 29
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object clause steps : 16
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object formula steps : 13
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object initial clauses used : 9
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object initial formulas used : 8
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object generating inferences : 6
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 10
% 0.23/1.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 57
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses : 58
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 58
% 0.23/1.41 # Processed clauses : 86
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 6
% 0.23/1.41 # ...subsumed : 9
% 0.23/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 70
% 0.23/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.23/1.41 # Generated clauses : 58
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 51
% 0.23/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Paramodulations : 58
% 0.23/1.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 68
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 28
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 35
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 18
% 0.23/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 27
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.23/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 129
% 0.23/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 124
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 0.23/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 133
% 0.23/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3208
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.41 # User time : 0.017 s
% 0.23/1.41 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 2968 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------