TSTP Solution File: CSR065+1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR065+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:13:57 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 29 ( 15 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 49 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 38 ( 18 ~; 12 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query65,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query65) ).
fof(just10,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt)
& ridgeline_topographical(X1) )
=> tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just10) ).
fof(just48,axiom,
! [X16,X17] :
( ( mtvisible(X16)
& genlmt(X16,X17) )
=> mtvisible(X17) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just48) ).
fof(just9,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
=> ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just9) ).
fof(just8,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member3993_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just8) ).
fof(just6,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member235_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just6) ).
fof(just7,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3993_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just7) ).
fof(just5,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just5) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query65]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
& ~ tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X18] :
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt)
| ~ ridgeline_topographical(X18)
| tptpofobject(X18,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just10])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X19,X20] :
( ~ mtvisible(X19)
| ~ genlmt(X19,X20)
| mtvisible(X20) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just48])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468))
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt)
| ~ ridgeline_topographical(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
| ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( mtvisible(X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member3993_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just8]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical)
| ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member235_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just6]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3993_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just7]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member3993_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt)
| ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_20]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just5]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),c_0_27]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR065+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.37 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.37 % DateTime : Sun May 19 00:27:08 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.49 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.22/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # new_bool_3 with pid 19851 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.22/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.49 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.49 # partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 19854 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.22/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.49 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.49 # partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.49
% 0.22/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 57
% 0.22/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 44
% 0.22/0.49 # Initial clauses : 14
% 0.22/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 14
% 0.22/0.49 # Processed clauses : 36
% 0.22/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 35
% 0.22/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.22/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.22/0.49 # Generated clauses : 16
% 0.22/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 18
% 0.22/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Paramodulations : 16
% 0.22/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 7
% 0.22/0.49 # ...of those cached : 3
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 17
% 0.22/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 0.22/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.22/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.22/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9
% 0.22/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 18
% 0.22/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 18
% 0.22/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 19
% 0.22/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17
% 0.22/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.22/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.22/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.22/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1055
% 0.22/0.49 # Search garbage collected termcells : 317
% 0.22/0.49
% 0.22/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.49 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.49 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.49 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1884 pages
% 0.22/0.49
% 0.22/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.49 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.49 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.49 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.22/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1756 pages
% 0.22/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.49 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------