TSTP Solution File: CSR064+2 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : CSR064+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:03 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.27s 1.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   20 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   16 (  10   ~;   4   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   1 sgn   6   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query114,conjecture,
    ~ genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query114) ).

fof(ax1_229,axiom,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( genls(X5,X6)
     => collection(X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_229) ).

fof(ax1_289,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ~ ( collection(X1)
        & individual(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_289) ).

fof(ax1_428,axiom,
    individual(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_428) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query114]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X7,X8] :
      ( ~ genls(X7,X8)
      | collection(X7) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_229])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ collection(X2)
      | ~ individual(X2) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_289])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( collection(X1)
    | ~ genls(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ individual(X1)
    | ~ collection(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    individual(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_428]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    collection(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : CSR064+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.04/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 15:05:40 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.27/1.45  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.27/1.45  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.27/1.45  # Preprocessing time       : 0.032 s
% 0.27/1.45  
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof found!
% 0.27/1.45  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.27/1.45  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object total steps             : 14
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object clause steps            : 6
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object formula steps           : 8
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 4
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object generating inferences   : 2
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 2
% 0.27/1.45  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.27/1.45  # Parsed axioms                        : 1132
% 0.27/1.45  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1095
% 0.27/1.45  # Initial clauses                      : 37
% 0.27/1.45  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 37
% 0.27/1.45  # Processed clauses                    : 43
% 0.27/1.45  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # ...subsumed                          : 13
% 0.27/1.45  # ...remaining for further processing  : 29
% 0.27/1.45  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # Generated clauses                    : 22
% 0.27/1.45  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 12
% 0.27/1.45  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # Paramodulations                      : 22
% 0.27/1.45  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # Current number of processed clauses  : 29
% 0.27/1.45  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 12
% 0.27/1.45  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/1.45  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.27/1.45  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 16
% 0.27/1.45  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
% 0.27/1.45  # ...number of literals in the above   : 12
% 0.27/1.45  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 89
% 0.27/1.45  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 81
% 0.27/1.45  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 13
% 0.27/1.45  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19
% 0.27/1.45  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 9072
% 0.27/1.45  
% 0.27/1.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/1.45  # User time                : 0.026 s
% 0.27/1.45  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.27/1.45  # Total time               : 0.033 s
% 0.27/1.45  # Maximum resident set size: 5196 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------