TSTP Solution File: CSR064+2 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR064+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:35:38 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.37s 0.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 19 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 15 ( 9 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 1 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax1_289,axiom,
! [X1] :
~ ( collection(X1)
& individual(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ga11GHkT4O/E---3.1_3028.p',ax1_289) ).
fof(ax1_229,axiom,
! [X5,X6] :
( genls(X5,X6)
=> collection(X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ga11GHkT4O/E---3.1_3028.p',ax1_229) ).
fof(query114,conjecture,
~ genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ga11GHkT4O/E---3.1_3028.p',query114) ).
fof(ax1_428,axiom,
individual(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ga11GHkT4O/E---3.1_3028.p',ax1_428) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X42] :
( ~ collection(X42)
| ~ individual(X42) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_289])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X53,X54] :
( ~ genls(X53,X54)
| collection(X53) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_229])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query114])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ collection(X1)
| ~ individual(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
individual(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_428]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( collection(X1)
| ~ genls(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
~ collection(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : CSR064+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 15:13:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.34/0.53 Running first-order model finding
% 0.34/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ga11GHkT4O/E---3.1_3028.p
% 0.37/0.56 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.37/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.56 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.37/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.37/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.37/0.56 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.56 # new_bool_1 with pid 3107 completed with status 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.37/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.56 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.37/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.37/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.37/0.56 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.37/0.56 # Search class: FHHNM-FFSF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.56 # partial match(1): FHHNF-FFSF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.56 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.37/0.56 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.56 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 61s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.56 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 3110 completed with status 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.37/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.56 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.37/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.37/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.37/0.56 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.37/0.56 # Search class: FHHNM-FFSF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.56 # partial match(1): FHHNF-FFSF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.56 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.37/0.56 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.56 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.37/0.56 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.37/0.56
% 0.37/0.56 # Proof found!
% 0.37/0.56 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.37/0.56 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.37/0.56 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.37/0.56 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1106
% 0.37/0.56 # Initial clauses : 26
% 0.37/0.56 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Initial clauses in saturation : 26
% 0.37/0.56 # Processed clauses : 41
% 0.37/0.56 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # ...subsumed : 7
% 0.37/0.56 # ...remaining for further processing : 34
% 0.37/0.56 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Generated clauses : 4
% 0.37/0.56 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.37/0.56 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Paramodulations : 4
% 0.37/0.56 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # NegExts : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.56 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.56 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.56 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.56 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.56 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.56 # Current number of processed clauses : 15
% 0.37/0.56 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.37/0.56 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.37/0.56 # Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.37/0.56 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7
% 0.37/0.56 # ...number of literals in the above : 13
% 0.37/0.56 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Current number of archived clauses : 19
% 0.37/0.56 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 42
% 0.37/0.56 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 40
% 0.37/0.56 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 7
% 0.37/0.56 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.37/0.56 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Termbank termtop insertions : 8525
% 0.37/0.56 # Search garbage collected termcells : 4913
% 0.37/0.56
% 0.37/0.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.56 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.37/0.56 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.37/0.56 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.37/0.56 # Maximum resident set size: 4152 pages
% 0.37/0.56
% 0.37/0.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.56 # User time : 0.017 s
% 0.37/0.56 # System time : 0.016 s
% 0.37/0.56 # Total time : 0.034 s
% 0.37/0.56 # Maximum resident set size: 2660 pages
% 0.37/0.56 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------