TSTP Solution File: CSR061+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : CSR061+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:24:52 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.50s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : CSR061+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 06:37:24 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.21/0.50  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.21/0.50  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.50  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.21/0.50  SPASS derived 980 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 556 clauses.
% 0.21/0.50  SPASS allocated 98153 KBytes.
% 0.21/0.50  SPASS spent	0:00:00.14 on the problem.
% 0.21/0.50  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.21/0.50  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.21/0.50  		0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 0.21/0.50  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.21/0.50  		0:00:00.03 for the reduction.
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  Here is a proof with depth 15, length 55 :
% 0.21/0.50  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.50  8[0:Inp] ||  -> genls(c_tptpcol_4_106497,c_tptpcol_3_98305)*l.
% 0.21/0.50  9[0:Inp] ||  -> genls(c_tptpcol_5_110593,c_tptpcol_4_106497)*r.
% 0.21/0.50  10[0:Inp] ||  -> genls(c_tptpcol_6_112641,c_tptpcol_5_110593)*r.
% 0.21/0.50  11[0:Inp] ||  -> genls(c_tptpcol_7_113665,c_tptpcol_6_112641)*r.
% 0.21/0.50  12[0:Inp] ||  -> genls(c_tptpcol_8_114177,c_tptpcol_7_113665)*r.
% 0.21/0.50  13[0:Inp] ||  -> genls(c_tptpcol_4_114689,c_tptpcol_3_114688)*l.
% 0.21/0.50  14[0:Inp] ||  -> genls(c_tptpcol_5_114690,c_tptpcol_4_114689)*r.
% 0.21/0.50  15[0:Inp] ||  -> genls(c_tptpcol_6_116738,c_tptpcol_5_114690)*r.
% 0.21/0.50  16[0:Inp] ||  -> genls(c_tptpcol_7_117762,c_tptpcol_6_116738)*r.
% 0.21/0.50  17[0:Inp] ||  -> genls(c_tptpcol_8_117763,c_tptpcol_7_117762)*r.
% 0.21/0.50  18[0:Inp] ||  -> genls(c_tptpcol_9_118019,c_tptpcol_8_117763)*r.
% 0.21/0.50  19[0:Inp] ||  -> genls(c_tptpcol_10_118020,c_tptpcol_9_118019)*r.
% 0.21/0.50  20[0:Inp] ||  -> genls(c_tptpcol_11_118084,c_tptpcol_10_118020)*r.
% 0.21/0.50  21[0:Inp] ||  -> genls(c_tptpcol_12_118116,c_tptpcol_11_118084)*r.
% 0.21/0.50  22[0:Inp] ||  -> genls(c_tptpcol_13_118117,c_tptpcol_12_118116)*r.
% 0.21/0.50  23[0:Inp] ||  -> genls(c_tptpcol_14_118118,c_tptpcol_13_118117)*r.
% 0.21/0.50  24[0:Inp] ||  -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_3_98305,c_tptpcol_3_114688)*.
% 0.21/0.50  25[0:Inp] || disjointwith(c_tptpcol_8_114177,c_tptpcol_14_118118)*+ -> .
% 0.21/0.50  107[0:Inp] || disjointwith(u,v)*+ -> disjointwith(v,u)*.
% 0.21/0.50  113[0:Inp] || genls(u,v)*+ disjointwith(w,v)* -> disjointwith(w,u)*.
% 0.21/0.50  114[0:Inp] || genls(u,v)*+ disjointwith(v,w)* -> disjointwith(u,w)*.
% 0.21/0.50  115[0:Inp] || genls(u,v)* genls(v,w)* -> genls(u,w)*.
% 0.21/0.50  124[0:Res:113.2,25.0] || genls(c_tptpcol_14_118118,u)+ disjointwith(c_tptpcol_8_114177,u)* -> .
% 0.21/0.50  241[0:Res:24.0,107.0] ||  -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_3_114688,c_tptpcol_3_98305)*.
% 0.21/0.50  450[0:NCh:115.2,115.1,124.0,21.0] || genls(c_tptpcol_14_118118,c_tptpcol_12_118116)+ disjointwith(c_tptpcol_8_114177,c_tptpcol_11_118084)* -> .
% 0.21/0.50  466[0:NCh:115.2,115.1,450.0,22.0] || genls(c_tptpcol_14_118118,c_tptpcol_13_118117) disjointwith(c_tptpcol_8_114177,c_tptpcol_11_118084)* -> .
% 0.21/0.50  467[0:MRR:466.0,23.0] || disjointwith(c_tptpcol_8_114177,c_tptpcol_11_118084)*+ -> .
% 0.21/0.50  473[0:Res:20.0,114.0] || disjointwith(c_tptpcol_10_118020,u)*+ -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_11_118084,u).
% 0.21/0.50  474[0:Res:19.0,114.0] || disjointwith(c_tptpcol_9_118019,u)*+ -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_10_118020,u).
% 0.21/0.50  475[0:Res:18.0,114.0] || disjointwith(c_tptpcol_8_117763,u)*+ -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_9_118019,u).
% 0.21/0.50  476[0:Res:17.0,114.0] || disjointwith(c_tptpcol_7_117762,u)*+ -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_8_117763,u).
% 0.21/0.50  477[0:Res:16.0,114.0] || disjointwith(c_tptpcol_6_116738,u)*+ -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_7_117762,u).
% 0.21/0.50  478[0:Res:15.0,114.0] || disjointwith(c_tptpcol_5_114690,u)*+ -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_6_116738,u).
% 0.21/0.50  479[0:Res:14.0,114.0] || disjointwith(c_tptpcol_4_114689,u)*+ -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_5_114690,u).
% 0.21/0.50  480[0:Res:13.0,114.0] || disjointwith(c_tptpcol_3_114688,u)+ -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_4_114689,u)*.
% 0.21/0.50  482[0:Res:12.0,114.0] || disjointwith(c_tptpcol_7_113665,u)*+ -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_8_114177,u).
% 0.21/0.50  483[0:Res:11.0,114.0] || disjointwith(c_tptpcol_6_112641,u)*+ -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_7_113665,u).
% 0.21/0.50  484[0:Res:10.0,114.0] || disjointwith(c_tptpcol_5_110593,u)*+ -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_6_112641,u).
% 0.21/0.50  485[0:Res:9.0,114.0] || disjointwith(c_tptpcol_4_106497,u)*+ -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_5_110593,u).
% 0.21/0.50  486[0:Res:8.0,114.0] || disjointwith(c_tptpcol_3_98305,u)+ -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_4_106497,u)*.
% 0.21/0.50  581[0:Res:241.0,480.0] ||  -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_4_114689,c_tptpcol_3_98305)*.
% 0.21/0.50  586[0:Res:581.0,479.0] ||  -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_5_114690,c_tptpcol_3_98305)*.
% 0.21/0.50  595[0:Res:586.0,478.0] ||  -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_6_116738,c_tptpcol_3_98305)*.
% 0.21/0.50  604[0:Res:595.0,477.0] ||  -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_7_117762,c_tptpcol_3_98305)*.
% 0.21/0.50  613[0:Res:604.0,476.0] ||  -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_8_117763,c_tptpcol_3_98305)*.
% 0.21/0.50  622[0:Res:613.0,475.0] ||  -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_9_118019,c_tptpcol_3_98305)*.
% 0.21/0.50  631[0:Res:622.0,474.0] ||  -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_10_118020,c_tptpcol_3_98305)*.
% 0.21/0.50  640[0:Res:631.0,473.0] ||  -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_11_118084,c_tptpcol_3_98305)*.
% 0.21/0.50  646[0:Res:640.0,107.0] ||  -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_3_98305,c_tptpcol_11_118084)*.
% 0.21/0.50  667[0:Res:646.0,486.0] ||  -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_4_106497,c_tptpcol_11_118084)*.
% 0.21/0.50  723[0:Res:667.0,485.0] ||  -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_5_110593,c_tptpcol_11_118084)*.
% 0.21/0.50  843[0:Res:723.0,484.0] ||  -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_6_112641,c_tptpcol_11_118084)*.
% 0.21/0.50  976[0:Res:843.0,483.0] ||  -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_7_113665,c_tptpcol_11_118084)*.
% 0.21/0.50  1155[0:Res:976.0,482.0] ||  -> disjointwith(c_tptpcol_8_114177,c_tptpcol_11_118084)*.
% 0.21/0.50  1157[0:MRR:1155.0,467.0] ||  -> .
% 0.21/0.50  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.21/0.50  Formulae used in the proof : just5 just7 just9 just11 just13 just15 just17 just19 just21 just23 just25 just27 just29 just31 just33 just35 just37 query61 just54 just55 just56 just97
% 0.21/0.50  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------