TSTP Solution File: CSR059+5 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR059+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:12 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 18.74s 12.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 18.74s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 22 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2294,plain,
( borderson(X1,X2)
| ~ borderson(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4ik79n_k/input.p',i_0_2294) ).
cnf(i_0_20,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4ik79n_k/input.p',i_0_20) ).
cnf(i_0_2723,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4ik79n_k/input.p',i_0_2723) ).
cnf(i_0_2326,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4ik79n_k/input.p',i_0_2326) ).
cnf(i_0_328,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4ik79n_k/input.p',i_0_328) ).
cnf(i_0_2724,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4ik79n_k/input.p',i_0_2724) ).
cnf(c_0_2731,plain,
( borderson(X1,X2)
| ~ borderson(X2,X1) ),
i_0_2294 ).
cnf(c_0_2732,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt) ),
i_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_2733,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47),
i_0_2723 ).
cnf(c_0_2734,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
i_0_2326 ).
cnf(c_0_2735,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
i_0_328 ).
cnf(c_0_2736,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
i_0_2724 ).
cnf(c_0_2737,plain,
~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2731,c_0_2732]),c_0_2733]) ).
cnf(c_0_2738,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2734,c_0_2735]),c_0_2736])]),c_0_2737]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR059+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 06:11:07 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 9.33/9.53 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.33/9.53 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 9.33/9.53 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 9.33/9.53 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 18.74/12.45 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 18.74/12.45 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 18.74/12.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.061 s
% 18.74/12.45
% 18.74/12.45 # Proof found!
% 18.74/12.45 # SZS status Theorem
% 18.74/12.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 18.74/12.45 # Proof object total steps : 14
% 18.74/12.45 # Proof object clause steps : 8
% 18.74/12.45 # Proof object formula steps : 6
% 18.74/12.45 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 18.74/12.45 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 18.74/12.45 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 18.74/12.45 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 18.74/12.45 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 18.74/12.45 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 18.74/12.45 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 18.74/12.45 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 18.74/12.45 # Parsed axioms : 2722
% 18.74/12.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 18.74/12.45 # Initial clauses : 2722
% 18.74/12.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 18.74/12.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2722
% 18.74/12.45 # Processed clauses : 2750
% 18.74/12.45 # ...of these trivial : 248
% 18.74/12.45 # ...subsumed : 65
% 18.74/12.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 2436
% 18.74/12.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5
% 18.74/12.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 18.74/12.45 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 18.74/12.45 # Backward-rewritten : 55
% 18.74/12.45 # Generated clauses : 7066
% 18.74/12.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 6519
% 18.74/12.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 10
% 18.74/12.45 # Paramodulations : 7061
% 18.74/12.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 18.74/12.45 # Equation resolutions : 5
% 18.74/12.45 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 18.74/12.45 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 18.74/12.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 2372
% 18.74/12.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1399
% 18.74/12.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 18.74/12.45 # Negative unit clauses : 18
% 18.74/12.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 955
% 18.74/12.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6182
% 18.74/12.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 11778
% 18.74/12.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 18.74/12.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 59
% 18.74/12.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 71357
% 18.74/12.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 60258
% 18.74/12.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 76
% 18.74/12.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9486
% 18.74/12.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 18.74/12.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1819
% 18.74/12.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 36
% 18.74/12.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 18.74/12.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 18.74/12.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 104964
% 18.74/12.45
% 18.74/12.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 18.74/12.45 # User time : 0.187 s
% 18.74/12.45 # System time : 0.015 s
% 18.74/12.45 # Total time : 0.202 s
% 18.74/12.45 # ...preprocessing : 0.061 s
% 18.74/12.45 # ...main loop : 0.141 s
% 18.74/12.45 # Maximum resident set size: 24592 pages
% 18.74/12.45
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------