TSTP Solution File: CSR059+4 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR059+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:13:51 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 1.88s 1.24s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.88s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 26 ( 11 ~; 8 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query209,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query209) ).
fof(ax3_44208,axiom,
! [X22,X23] :
( ( mtvisible(X22)
& genlmt(X22,X23) )
=> mtvisible(X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_44208) ).
fof(ax3_6006,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_6006) ).
fof(ax3_11126,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_11126) ).
fof(ax3_43084,axiom,
! [X16,X17] :
( borderson(X16,X17)
=> borderson(X17,X16) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_43084) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query209]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X31,X32] :
( ~ mtvisible(X31)
| ~ genlmt(X31,X32)
| mtvisible(X32) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_44208])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
& ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_6006])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( mtvisible(X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_11126]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X28,X29] :
( ~ borderson(X28,X29)
| borderson(X29,X28) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_43084])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( borderson(X2,X1)
| ~ borderson(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.12 % Problem : CSR059+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun May 19 00:39:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.88/1.24 # Version: 3.1.0
% 1.88/1.24 # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.88/1.24 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.88/1.24 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.88/1.24 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.88/1.24 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.88/1.24 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.88/1.24 # sh5l with pid 8015 completed with status 0
% 1.88/1.24 # Result found by sh5l
% 1.88/1.24 # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.88/1.24 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.88/1.24 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.88/1.24 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.88/1.24 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.88/1.24 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.88/1.24 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 1.88/1.24 # Search class: FHUNF-FFMM11-SFFFFFNN
% 1.88/1.24 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.88/1.24 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 1.88/1.24 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 8082 completed with status 0
% 1.88/1.24 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 1.88/1.24 # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.88/1.24 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.88/1.24 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.88/1.24 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.88/1.24 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.88/1.24 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.88/1.24 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 1.88/1.24 # Search class: FHUNF-FFMM11-SFFFFFNN
% 1.88/1.24 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.88/1.24 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 1.88/1.24 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 1.88/1.24 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.88/1.24
% 1.88/1.24 # Proof found!
% 1.88/1.24 # SZS status Theorem
% 1.88/1.24 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.88/1.24 # Parsed axioms : 44217
% 1.88/1.24 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 44089
% 1.88/1.24 # Initial clauses : 129
% 1.88/1.24 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.88/1.24 # Initial clauses in saturation : 129
% 1.88/1.24 # Processed clauses : 239
% 1.88/1.24 # ...of these trivial : 13
% 1.88/1.24 # ...subsumed : 20
% 1.88/1.24 # ...remaining for further processing : 206
% 1.88/1.24 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 1.88/1.24 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.88/1.24 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 1.88/1.24 # Backward-rewritten : 4
% 1.88/1.24 # Generated clauses : 79
% 1.88/1.24 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 63
% 1.88/1.24 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.88/1.24 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.88/1.24 # Paramodulations : 79
% 1.88/1.24 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.88/1.24 # NegExts : 0
% 1.88/1.24 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 1.88/1.24 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.88/1.24 # Total rewrite steps : 50
% 1.88/1.24 # ...of those cached : 32
% 1.88/1.24 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.88/1.24 # Propositional check models : 0
% 1.88/1.24 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.88/1.24 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.88/1.24 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.88/1.24 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.88/1.24 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.88/1.24 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.88/1.24 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.88/1.24 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.88/1.24 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.88/1.24 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.88/1.24 # Current number of processed clauses : 101
% 1.88/1.24 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 57
% 1.88/1.24 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.88/1.24 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 1.88/1.24 # Non-unit-clauses : 42
% 1.88/1.24 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 51
% 1.88/1.24 # ...number of literals in the above : 96
% 1.88/1.24 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.88/1.24 # Current number of archived clauses : 105
% 1.88/1.24 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1756
% 1.88/1.24 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1546
% 1.88/1.24 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 20
% 1.88/1.24 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 357
% 1.88/1.24 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.88/1.24 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 1.88/1.24 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 1.88/1.24 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.88/1.24 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.88/1.24 # Termbank termtop insertions : 296582
% 1.88/1.24 # Search garbage collected termcells : 157736
% 1.88/1.24
% 1.88/1.24 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.88/1.24 # User time : 0.168 s
% 1.88/1.24 # System time : 0.079 s
% 1.88/1.24 # Total time : 0.247 s
% 1.88/1.24 # Maximum resident set size: 81520 pages
% 1.88/1.24
% 1.88/1.24 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.88/1.24 # User time : 0.614 s
% 1.88/1.24 # System time : 0.111 s
% 1.88/1.24 # Total time : 0.726 s
% 1.88/1.24 # Maximum resident set size: 33932 pages
% 1.88/1.24 % E---3.1 exiting
% 1.88/1.24 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------