TSTP Solution File: CSR059+1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : CSR059+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:11:34 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 1.79s 1.21s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.79s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 65 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 52 ( 23 ~; 19 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 27 ( 0 sgn 18 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just1) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just2) ).
fof(f29,axiom,
! [X9,X10] :
( borderson(X9,X10)
=> borderson(X10,X9) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just29) ).
fof(f31,axiom,
! [X14,X15] :
( ( genlmt(X14,X15)
& mtvisible(X14) )
=> mtvisible(X15) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just31) ).
fof(f40,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query59) ).
fof(f41,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f40]) ).
fof(f66,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( borderson(X0,X1)
=> borderson(X1,X0) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f29]) ).
fof(f68,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( genlmt(X0,X1)
& mtvisible(X0) )
=> mtvisible(X1) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f31]) ).
fof(f90,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f106,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( borderson(X1,X0)
| ~ borderson(X0,X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f66]) ).
fof(f107,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X0,X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f68]) ).
fof(f108,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X0,X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f107]) ).
fof(f117,plain,
( ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47)
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).
fof(f118,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f119,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f90]) ).
fof(f132,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( borderson(X1,X0)
| ~ borderson(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f106]) ).
fof(f134,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X0,X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f108]) ).
fof(f143,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f117]) ).
fof(f144,plain,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f117]) ).
cnf(c_49,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f118]) ).
cnf(c_50,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f119]) ).
cnf(c_63,plain,
( ~ borderson(X0,X1)
| borderson(X1,X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f132]) ).
cnf(c_65,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X0,X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X0)
| mtvisible(X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).
cnf(c_74,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f144]) ).
cnf(c_75,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f143]) ).
cnf(c_82,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
inference(subtyping,[status(esa)],[c_75]) ).
cnf(c_89,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X0_13,X1_13)
| ~ mtvisible(X0_13)
| mtvisible(X1_13) ),
inference(subtyping,[status(esa)],[c_65]) ).
cnf(c_91,plain,
( ~ borderson(X0_14,X1_14)
| borderson(X1_14,X0_14) ),
inference(subtyping,[status(esa)],[c_63]) ).
cnf(c_93,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47) ),
inference(subtyping,[status(esa)],[c_50]) ).
cnf(c_94,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
inference(subtyping,[status(esa)],[c_49]) ).
cnf(c_96,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_82]) ).
cnf(c_103,plain,
( ~ genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,X0_13)
| mtvisible(X0_13) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_89,c_96]) ).
cnf(c_105,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_103,c_94]) ).
cnf(c_110,plain,
borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_105,c_93]) ).
cnf(c_112,plain,
borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_91]) ).
cnf(c_113,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_112,c_74]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.14 % Problem : CSR059+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.09/0.14 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Thu May 2 23:20:21 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.79/1.21 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.79/1.21 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.79/1.21
% 1.79/1.21 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 1.79/1.21
% 1.79/1.21 ------ iProver source info
% 1.79/1.21
% 1.79/1.21 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 1.79/1.21 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 1.79/1.21 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.79/1.21
% 1.79/1.21 ------ Parsing...
% 1.79/1.21 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...------ preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 1.79/1.21
% 1.79/1.21
% 1.79/1.21 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 8 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.79/1.21
% 1.79/1.21 ------ Preprocessing...------ preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 1.79/1.21 gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 1.79/1.21 ------ Proving...
% 1.79/1.21 ------ Problem Properties
% 1.79/1.21
% 1.79/1.21
% 1.79/1.21 clauses 13
% 1.79/1.21 conjectures 2
% 1.79/1.21 EPR 13
% 1.79/1.21 Horn 13
% 1.79/1.21 unary 6
% 1.79/1.21 binary 5
% 1.79/1.21 lits 22
% 1.79/1.21 lits eq 0
% 1.79/1.21 fd_pure 0
% 1.79/1.21 fd_pseudo 0
% 1.79/1.21 fd_cond 0
% 1.79/1.21 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 1.79/1.21 AC symbols 0
% 1.79/1.21
% 1.79/1.21 ------ Schedule EPR Horn non eq is on
% 1.79/1.21
% 1.79/1.21 ------ no equalities: superposition off
% 1.79/1.21
% 1.79/1.21 ------ Option_epr_horn Time Limit: Unbounded
% 1.79/1.21
% 1.79/1.21
% 1.79/1.21 ------
% 1.79/1.21 Current options:
% 1.79/1.21 ------
% 1.79/1.21
% 1.79/1.21
% 1.79/1.21
% 1.79/1.21
% 1.79/1.21 ------ Proving...
% 1.79/1.21
% 1.79/1.21
% 1.79/1.21 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.79/1.21
% 1.79/1.21 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.79/1.21
% 1.79/1.21
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------