TSTP Solution File: CSR057-10 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR057-10 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:17:46 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.09s 1.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.09s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 38 ( 38 unt; 0 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 38 ( 37 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 17 ( 17 usr; 7 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(ax3_44208,axiom,
ifeq4(genlmt(X1,X2),true,ifeq4(mtvisible(X1),true,mtvisible(X2),true),true) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_44208) ).
cnf(ax3_4591,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_4591) ).
cnf(query207,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query207) ).
cnf(ifeq_axiom,axiom,
ifeq4(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom) ).
cnf(ax3_11699,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_11699) ).
cnf(ax3_1625,axiom,
ifeq4(mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),true,geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),true) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_1625) ).
cnf(ax3_3986,axiom,
ifeq4(geolevel_4(X1),true,geographicalregion(X1),true) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_3986) ).
cnf(ax3_1936,axiom,
ifeq4(geographicalregion(X1),true,partiallytangible(X1),true) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_1936) ).
cnf(ax3_27702,axiom,
ifeq4(partiallytangible(X1),true,enduringthing_localized(X1),true) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_27702) ).
cnf(ax3_2801,axiom,
ifeq4(enduringthing_localized(X1),true,spatialthing_nonsituational(X1),true) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_2801) ).
cnf(ax3_43404,axiom,
ifeq4(spatialthing_nonsituational(X1),true,inregion(X1,X1),true) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_43404) ).
cnf(goal,negated_conjecture,
a != b,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal) ).
cnf(query207_1,negated_conjecture,
ifeq3(inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),true,a,b) = b,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query207_1) ).
cnf(ifeq_axiom_001,axiom,
ifeq3(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom_001) ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
ifeq4(genlmt(X1,X2),true,ifeq4(mtvisible(X1),true,mtvisible(X2),true),true) = true,
ax3_44208 ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt) = true,
ax3_4591 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt) = true,
query207 ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
ifeq4(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
ifeq_axiom ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt) = true,
ax3_11699 ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
ifeq4(mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),true,geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),true) = true,
ax3_1625 ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_18]),c_0_17]),c_0_19]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
ifeq4(geolevel_4(X1),true,geographicalregion(X1),true) = true,
ax3_3986 ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
ifeq4(geographicalregion(X1),true,partiallytangible(X1),true) = true,
ax3_1936 ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
geographicalregion(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
ifeq4(partiallytangible(X1),true,enduringthing_localized(X1),true) = true,
ax3_27702 ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
partiallytangible(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
ifeq4(enduringthing_localized(X1),true,spatialthing_nonsituational(X1),true) = true,
ax3_2801 ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
enduringthing_localized(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
ifeq4(spatialthing_nonsituational(X1),true,inregion(X1,X1),true) = true,
ax3_43404 ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
spatialthing_nonsituational(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
a != b,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[goal]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
ifeq3(inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),true,a,b) = b,
query207_1 ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
inregion(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,axiom,
ifeq3(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
ifeq_axiom_001 ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
a != b,
c_0_32 ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35]),c_0_36]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.14 % Problem : CSR057-10 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.06/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.36 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.36 % DateTime : Sun May 19 00:26:53 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.18/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.09/1.60 # Version: 3.1.0
% 1.09/1.60 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 1.09/1.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.09/1.60 # Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 1.09/1.60 # Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 1.09/1.60 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.09/1.60 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 300s (1) cores
% 1.09/1.60 # new_bool_3 with pid 1740 completed with status 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 1.09/1.60 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 1.09/1.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.09/1.60 # Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 1.09/1.60 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.09/1.60 # Search class: FUUPM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 1.09/1.60 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 1.09/1.60 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 541s (1) cores
% 1.09/1.60 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 91s (1) cores
% 1.09/1.60 # Starting new_bool_3 with 91s (1) cores
% 1.09/1.60 # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1748 completed with status 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.09/1.60 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 1.09/1.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.09/1.60 # Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 1.09/1.60 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.09/1.60 # Search class: FUUPM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 1.09/1.60 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 1.09/1.60 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 541s (1) cores
% 1.09/1.60 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 1.09/1.60 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.09/1.60
% 1.09/1.60 # Proof found!
% 1.09/1.60 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.09/1.60 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.09/1.60 # Parsed axioms : 44220
% 1.09/1.60 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 44145
% 1.09/1.60 # Initial clauses : 75
% 1.09/1.60 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Initial clauses in saturation : 75
% 1.09/1.60 # Processed clauses : 168
% 1.09/1.60 # ...of these trivial : 20
% 1.09/1.60 # ...subsumed : 0
% 1.09/1.60 # ...remaining for further processing : 148
% 1.09/1.60 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 1.09/1.60 # Generated clauses : 171
% 1.09/1.60 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 132
% 1.09/1.60 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Paramodulations : 171
% 1.09/1.60 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.09/1.60 # NegExts : 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Total rewrite steps : 218
% 1.09/1.60 # ...of those cached : 105
% 1.09/1.60 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Propositional check models : 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.09/1.60 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.09/1.60 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.09/1.60 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.09/1.60 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.09/1.60 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.09/1.60 # Current number of processed clauses : 84
% 1.09/1.60 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 83
% 1.09/1.60 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 1.09/1.60 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 96
% 1.09/1.60 # ...number of literals in the above : 96
% 1.09/1.60 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Current number of archived clauses : 64
% 1.09/1.60 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.09/1.60 # BW rewrite match attempts : 75
% 1.09/1.60 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 1.09/1.60 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.09/1.60 # Termbank termtop insertions : 336797
% 1.09/1.60 # Search garbage collected termcells : 126199
% 1.09/1.60
% 1.09/1.60 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.09/1.60 # User time : 0.179 s
% 1.09/1.60 # System time : 0.071 s
% 1.09/1.60 # Total time : 0.251 s
% 1.09/1.60 # Maximum resident set size: 77480 pages
% 1.09/1.60
% 1.09/1.60 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.09/1.60 # User time : 1.023 s
% 1.09/1.60 # System time : 0.132 s
% 1.09/1.60 # Total time : 1.155 s
% 1.09/1.60 # Maximum resident set size: 30288 pages
% 1.09/1.60 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------