TSTP Solution File: CSR057+4 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR057+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:35:33 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 19.56s 18.85s
% Output : CNFRefutation 19.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 38 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 67 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 51 ( 22 ~; 18 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 9 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 27 ( 1 sgn 15 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query207,conjecture,
? [X16] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt)
=> inregion(X16,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zeyuh1KeKJ/E---3.1_15970.p',query207) ).
fof(ax3_44208,axiom,
! [X22,X23] :
( ( mtvisible(X22)
& genlmt(X22,X23) )
=> mtvisible(X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zeyuh1KeKJ/E---3.1_15970.p',ax3_44208) ).
fof(ax3_4591,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zeyuh1KeKJ/E---3.1_15970.p',ax3_4591) ).
fof(ax3_24970,axiom,
! [X1] :
( geographicalthing(X1)
=> enduringthing_localized(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zeyuh1KeKJ/E---3.1_15970.p',ax3_24970) ).
fof(ax3_13968,axiom,
! [X1] :
( geographicalregion(X1)
=> geographicalthing(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zeyuh1KeKJ/E---3.1_15970.p',ax3_13968) ).
fof(ax3_1625,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
=> geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zeyuh1KeKJ/E---3.1_15970.p',ax3_1625) ).
fof(ax3_11699,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zeyuh1KeKJ/E---3.1_15970.p',ax3_11699) ).
fof(ax3_2801,axiom,
! [X1] :
( enduringthing_localized(X1)
=> spatialthing_nonsituational(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zeyuh1KeKJ/E---3.1_15970.p',ax3_2801) ).
fof(ax3_3986,axiom,
! [X1] :
( geolevel_4(X1)
=> geographicalregion(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zeyuh1KeKJ/E---3.1_15970.p',ax3_3986) ).
fof(ax3_43404,axiom,
! [X16] :
( spatialthing_nonsituational(X16)
=> inregion(X16,X16) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zeyuh1KeKJ/E---3.1_15970.p',ax3_43404) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X16] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt)
=> inregion(X16,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query207]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X47,X48] :
( ~ mtvisible(X47)
| ~ genlmt(X47,X48)
| mtvisible(X48) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_44208])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
! [X24] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt)
& ~ inregion(X24,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( mtvisible(X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_4591]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X196] :
( ~ geographicalthing(X196)
| enduringthing_localized(X196) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_24970])])]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X445] :
( ~ geographicalregion(X445)
| geographicalthing(X445) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_13968])])]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_1625])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_11699]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X105] :
( ~ enduringthing_localized(X105)
| spatialthing_nonsituational(X105) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_2801])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( enduringthing_localized(X1)
| ~ geographicalthing(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( geographicalthing(X1)
| ~ geographicalregion(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
fof(c_0_24,plain,
! [X119] :
( ~ geolevel_4(X119)
| geographicalregion(X119) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_3986])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).
fof(c_0_27,plain,
! [X46] :
( ~ spatialthing_nonsituational(X46)
| inregion(X46,X46) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_43404])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( spatialthing_nonsituational(X1)
| ~ enduringthing_localized(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( enduringthing_localized(X1)
| ~ geographicalregion(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( geographicalregion(X1)
| ~ geolevel_4(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( inregion(X1,X1)
| ~ spatialthing_nonsituational(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( spatialthing_nonsituational(X1)
| ~ geographicalregion(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
geographicalregion(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
~ spatialthing_nonsituational(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.10 % Problem : CSR057+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.08/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Fri May 3 14:30:22 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 17.48/17.81 Running first-order model finding
% 17.48/17.81 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zeyuh1KeKJ/E---3.1_15970.p
% 19.56/18.85 # Version: 3.1.0
% 19.56/18.85 # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 19.56/18.85 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 19.56/18.85 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 19.56/18.85 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 19.56/18.85 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 19.56/18.85 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 19.56/18.85 # sh5l with pid 16052 completed with status 0
% 19.56/18.85 # Result found by sh5l
% 19.56/18.85 # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 19.56/18.85 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 19.56/18.85 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 19.56/18.85 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 19.56/18.85 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 19.56/18.85 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 19.56/18.85 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 19.56/18.85 # Search class: FHHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 19.56/18.85 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 19.56/18.85 # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 19.56/18.85 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 135s (1) cores
% 19.56/18.85 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with pid 16055 completed with status 0
% 19.56/18.85 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 19.56/18.85 # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 19.56/18.85 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 19.56/18.85 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 19.56/18.85 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 19.56/18.85 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 19.56/18.85 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 19.56/18.85 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 19.56/18.85 # Search class: FHHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 19.56/18.85 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 19.56/18.85 # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 19.56/18.85 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 135s (1) cores
% 19.56/18.85 # Preprocessing time : 0.020 s
% 19.56/18.85 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 19.56/18.85
% 19.56/18.85 # Proof found!
% 19.56/18.85 # SZS status Theorem
% 19.56/18.85 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 19.56/18.85 # Parsed axioms : 44217
% 19.56/18.85 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 43685
% 19.56/18.85 # Initial clauses : 533
% 19.56/18.85 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 19.56/18.85 # Initial clauses in saturation : 532
% 19.56/18.85 # Processed clauses : 752
% 19.56/18.85 # ...of these trivial : 41
% 19.56/18.85 # ...subsumed : 33
% 19.56/18.85 # ...remaining for further processing : 678
% 19.56/18.85 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 19.56/18.85 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 19.56/18.85 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 19.56/18.85 # Backward-rewritten : 4
% 19.56/18.85 # Generated clauses : 61
% 19.56/18.85 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 45
% 19.56/18.85 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 19.56/18.85 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 19.56/18.85 # Paramodulations : 60
% 19.56/18.85 # Factorizations : 0
% 19.56/18.85 # NegExts : 0
% 19.56/18.85 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 19.56/18.85 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 19.56/18.85 # Total rewrite steps : 66
% 19.56/18.85 # ...of those cached : 39
% 19.56/18.85 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 19.56/18.85 # Propositional check models : 0
% 19.56/18.85 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 19.56/18.85 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 19.56/18.85 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 19.56/18.85 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 19.56/18.85 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 19.56/18.85 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 19.56/18.85 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 19.56/18.85 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 19.56/18.85 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 19.56/18.85 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 19.56/18.85 # Current number of processed clauses : 207
% 19.56/18.85 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 91
% 19.56/18.85 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 19.56/18.85 # Negative unit clauses : 12
% 19.56/18.85 # Non-unit-clauses : 104
% 19.56/18.85 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 291
% 19.56/18.85 # ...number of literals in the above : 545
% 19.56/18.85 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 19.56/18.85 # Current number of archived clauses : 470
% 19.56/18.85 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 12157
% 19.56/18.85 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10720
% 19.56/18.85 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 33
% 19.56/18.85 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 575
% 19.56/18.85 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 19.56/18.85 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 19.56/18.85 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 19.56/18.85 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 19.56/18.85 # Condensation successes : 0
% 19.56/18.85 # Termbank termtop insertions : 315897
% 19.56/18.85 # Search garbage collected termcells : 158844
% 19.56/18.85
% 19.56/18.85 # -------------------------------------------------
% 19.56/18.85 # User time : 0.201 s
% 19.56/18.85 # System time : 0.102 s
% 19.56/18.85 # Total time : 0.304 s
% 19.56/18.85 # Maximum resident set size: 82236 pages
% 19.56/18.85
% 19.56/18.85 # -------------------------------------------------
% 19.56/18.85 # User time : 0.849 s
% 19.56/18.85 # System time : 0.152 s
% 19.56/18.85 # Total time : 1.002 s
% 19.56/18.85 # Maximum resident set size: 34600 pages
% 19.56/18.85 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------