TSTP Solution File: CSR057+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR057+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:09 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 9.67s 3.36s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.67s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 30 ( 16 unt; 0 nHn; 30 RR)
% Number of literals : 46 ( 0 equ; 22 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2463,negated_conjecture,
~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ucuf2oy3/input.p',i_0_2463) ).
cnf(i_0_2017,plain,
( inregion(X1,X1)
| ~ spatialthing_nonsituational(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ucuf2oy3/input.p',i_0_2017) ).
cnf(i_0_2351,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ucuf2oy3/input.p',i_0_2351) ).
cnf(i_0_90,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ucuf2oy3/input.p',i_0_90) ).
cnf(i_0_2464,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ucuf2oy3/input.p',i_0_2464) ).
cnf(i_0_181,plain,
( spatialthing_nonsituational(X1)
| ~ enduringthing_localized(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ucuf2oy3/input.p',i_0_181) ).
cnf(i_0_46,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ucuf2oy3/input.p',i_0_46) ).
cnf(i_0_922,plain,
( enduringthing_localized(X1)
| ~ partiallytangible(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ucuf2oy3/input.p',i_0_922) ).
cnf(i_0_49,plain,
( geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ucuf2oy3/input.p',i_0_49) ).
cnf(i_0_527,plain,
( partiallytangible(X1)
| ~ geographicalregion(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ucuf2oy3/input.p',i_0_527) ).
cnf(i_0_283,plain,
( geographicalregion(X1)
| ~ geolevel_4(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ucuf2oy3/input.p',i_0_283) ).
cnf(c_0_2476,negated_conjecture,
~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
i_0_2463 ).
cnf(c_0_2477,plain,
( inregion(X1,X1)
| ~ spatialthing_nonsituational(X1) ),
i_0_2017 ).
cnf(c_0_2478,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
i_0_2351 ).
cnf(c_0_2479,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
i_0_90 ).
cnf(c_0_2480,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt),
i_0_2464 ).
cnf(c_0_2481,negated_conjecture,
~ spatialthing_nonsituational(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2476,c_0_2477]) ).
cnf(c_0_2482,plain,
( spatialthing_nonsituational(X1)
| ~ enduringthing_localized(X1) ),
i_0_181 ).
cnf(c_0_2483,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
i_0_46 ).
cnf(c_0_2484,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2478,c_0_2479]),c_0_2480])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2485,plain,
~ enduringthing_localized(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2481,c_0_2482]) ).
cnf(c_0_2486,plain,
( enduringthing_localized(X1)
| ~ partiallytangible(X1) ),
i_0_922 ).
cnf(c_0_2487,plain,
( geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
i_0_49 ).
cnf(c_0_2488,plain,
mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2478,c_0_2483]),c_0_2484])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2489,plain,
~ partiallytangible(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2485,c_0_2486]) ).
cnf(c_0_2490,plain,
( partiallytangible(X1)
| ~ geographicalregion(X1) ),
i_0_527 ).
cnf(c_0_2491,plain,
( geographicalregion(X1)
| ~ geolevel_4(X1) ),
i_0_283 ).
cnf(c_0_2492,plain,
geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2487,c_0_2488])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2493,plain,
~ geographicalregion(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2489,c_0_2490]) ).
cnf(c_0_2494,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2491,c_0_2492]),c_0_2493]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : CSR057+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 06:09:57 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.37/0.59 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.37/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.37/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 9.67/3.36 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 9.67/3.36 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 9.67/3.36 # Preprocessing time : 0.056 s
% 9.67/3.36
% 9.67/3.36 # Proof found!
% 9.67/3.36 # SZS status Theorem
% 9.67/3.36 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.67/3.36 # Proof object total steps : 30
% 9.67/3.36 # Proof object clause steps : 19
% 9.67/3.36 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 9.67/3.36 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 9.67/3.36 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 9.67/3.36 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 9.67/3.36 # Proof object initial clauses used : 11
% 9.67/3.36 # Proof object initial formulas used : 11
% 9.67/3.36 # Proof object generating inferences : 7
% 9.67/3.36 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 7
% 9.67/3.36 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.67/3.36 # Parsed axioms : 2464
% 9.67/3.36 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 9.67/3.36 # Initial clauses : 2464
% 9.67/3.36 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 9.67/3.36 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2464
% 9.67/3.36 # Processed clauses : 2536
% 9.67/3.36 # ...of these trivial : 154
% 9.67/3.36 # ...subsumed : 194
% 9.67/3.36 # ...remaining for further processing : 2188
% 9.67/3.36 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 9.67/3.36 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 9.67/3.36 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 9.67/3.36 # Backward-rewritten : 42
% 9.67/3.36 # Generated clauses : 5546
% 9.67/3.36 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 5220
% 9.67/3.36 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 12
% 9.67/3.36 # Paramodulations : 5546
% 9.67/3.36 # Factorizations : 0
% 9.67/3.36 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 9.67/3.36 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 9.67/3.36 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 9.67/3.36 # Current number of processed clauses : 2146
% 9.67/3.36 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 849
% 9.67/3.36 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 9.67/3.36 # Negative unit clauses : 44
% 9.67/3.36 # Non-unit-clauses : 1253
% 9.67/3.36 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5099
% 9.67/3.36 # ...number of literals in the above : 8989
% 9.67/3.36 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 9.67/3.36 # Current number of archived clauses : 42
% 9.67/3.36 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 204993
% 9.67/3.36 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 187785
% 9.67/3.36 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 206
% 9.67/3.36 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24759
% 9.67/3.36 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 9.67/3.36 # BW rewrite match attempts : 18
% 9.67/3.36 # BW rewrite match successes : 8
% 9.67/3.36 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 9.67/3.36 # Condensation successes : 0
% 9.67/3.36 # Termbank termtop insertions : 75176
% 9.67/3.36
% 9.67/3.36 # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.67/3.36 # User time : 0.180 s
% 9.67/3.36 # System time : 0.008 s
% 9.67/3.36 # Total time : 0.188 s
% 9.67/3.36 # ...preprocessing : 0.056 s
% 9.67/3.36 # ...main loop : 0.132 s
% 9.67/3.36 # Maximum resident set size: 19468 pages
% 9.67/3.36
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------