TSTP Solution File: CSR057+2 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR057+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:09 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 9.18s 2.85s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 9.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   24 (  14 unt;   0 nHn;  24 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   36 (   0 equ;  15 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_129,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-khacy_tt/input.p',i_0_129) ).

cnf(i_0_231,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-khacy_tt/input.p',i_0_231) ).

cnf(i_0_1066,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-khacy_tt/input.p',i_0_1066) ).

cnf(i_0_367,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-khacy_tt/input.p',i_0_367) ).

cnf(i_0_512,plain,
    ( geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-khacy_tt/input.p',i_0_512) ).

cnf(i_0_510,plain,
    ( geographicalregion(X1)
    | ~ geolevel_4(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-khacy_tt/input.p',i_0_510) ).

cnf(i_0_1065,negated_conjecture,
    ~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-khacy_tt/input.p',i_0_1065) ).

cnf(i_0_155,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-khacy_tt/input.p',i_0_155) ).

cnf(i_0_47,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(X1,X1)
    | ~ geographicalregion(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-khacy_tt/input.p',i_0_47) ).

cnf(c_0_1076,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_129 ).

cnf(c_0_1077,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    i_0_231 ).

cnf(c_0_1078,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt),
    i_0_1066 ).

cnf(c_0_1079,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
    i_0_367 ).

cnf(c_0_1080,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1076,c_0_1077]),c_0_1078])]) ).

cnf(c_0_1081,plain,
    ( geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
    i_0_512 ).

cnf(c_0_1082,plain,
    mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1076,c_0_1079]),c_0_1080])]) ).

cnf(c_0_1083,plain,
    ( geographicalregion(X1)
    | ~ geolevel_4(X1) ),
    i_0_510 ).

cnf(c_0_1084,plain,
    geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_1081,c_0_1082])]) ).

cnf(c_0_1085,negated_conjecture,
    ~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
    i_0_1065 ).

cnf(c_0_1086,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_155 ).

cnf(c_0_1087,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(X1,X1)
    | ~ geographicalregion(X1) ),
    i_0_47 ).

cnf(c_0_1088,plain,
    geographicalregion(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1083,c_0_1084]) ).

cnf(c_0_1089,negated_conjecture,
    ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1085,c_0_1086]) ).

cnf(c_0_1090,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1087,c_0_1088]),c_0_1089]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.13  % Problem  : CSR057+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.05/0.14  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 13:52:36 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.47  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.22/0.50  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.50  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.22/0.50  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.22/0.50  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 9.18/2.85  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 9.18/2.85  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 9.18/2.85  # Preprocessing time       : 0.024 s
% 9.18/2.85  
% 9.18/2.85  # Proof found!
% 9.18/2.85  # SZS status Theorem
% 9.18/2.85  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.18/2.85  # Proof object total steps             : 24
% 9.18/2.85  # Proof object clause steps            : 15
% 9.18/2.85  # Proof object formula steps           : 9
% 9.18/2.85  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 9.18/2.85  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 3
% 9.18/2.85  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 2
% 9.18/2.85  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 9
% 9.18/2.85  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 9
% 9.18/2.85  # Proof object generating inferences   : 5
% 9.18/2.85  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 7
% 9.18/2.85  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.18/2.85  # Parsed axioms                        : 1066
% 9.18/2.85  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 9.18/2.85  # Initial clauses                      : 1066
% 9.18/2.85  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 9.18/2.85  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 1066
% 9.18/2.85  # Processed clauses                    : 1377
% 9.18/2.85  # ...of these trivial                  : 34
% 9.18/2.85  # ...subsumed                          : 37
% 9.18/2.85  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1306
% 9.18/2.85  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 9.18/2.85  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 9.18/2.85  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 9.18/2.85  # Backward-rewritten                   : 6
% 9.18/2.85  # Generated clauses                    : 2631
% 9.18/2.85  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 2422
% 9.18/2.85  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 9.18/2.85  # Paramodulations                      : 2631
% 9.18/2.85  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 9.18/2.85  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 9.18/2.85  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 9.18/2.85  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 9.18/2.85  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1300
% 9.18/2.85  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 411
% 9.18/2.85  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 9.18/2.85  #    Negative unit clauses             : 102
% 9.18/2.85  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 787
% 9.18/2.85  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2102
% 9.18/2.85  # ...number of literals in the above   : 3678
% 9.18/2.85  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 9.18/2.85  # Current number of archived clauses   : 6
% 9.18/2.85  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 78649
% 9.18/2.85  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 72770
% 9.18/2.85  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 31
% 9.18/2.85  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 31399
% 9.18/2.85  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 9.18/2.85  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 5
% 9.18/2.85  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 9.18/2.85  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 9.18/2.85  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 9.18/2.85  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 34683
% 9.18/2.85  
% 9.18/2.85  # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.18/2.85  # User time                : 0.070 s
% 9.18/2.85  # System time              : 0.013 s
% 9.18/2.85  # Total time               : 0.083 s
% 9.18/2.85  # ...preprocessing         : 0.024 s
% 9.18/2.85  # ...main loop             : 0.059 s
% 9.18/2.85  # Maximum resident set size: 11020 pages
% 9.18/2.85  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------