TSTP Solution File: CSR057+2 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR057+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:17:46 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 30 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 52 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 39 ( 17 ~; 13 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 2 sgn 13 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query107,conjecture,
? [X13] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt)
=> inregion(X13,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query107) ).
fof(ax1_1123,axiom,
! [X20,X21] :
( ( mtvisible(X20)
& genlmt(X20,X21) )
=> mtvisible(X21) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_1123) ).
fof(ax1_462,axiom,
! [X1] :
( geolevel_4(X1)
=> geographicalregion(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_462) ).
fof(ax1_464,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
=> geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_464) ).
fof(ax1_1,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_1) ).
fof(ax1_326,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_326) ).
fof(ax1_128,axiom,
! [X5,X6] :
( geographicalsubregions(X5,X6)
=> inregion(X6,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_128) ).
fof(ax1_1042,axiom,
! [X13] :
( geographicalregion(X13)
=> geographicalsubregions(X13,X13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_1042) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X13] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt)
=> inregion(X13,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query107]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X33,X34] :
( ~ mtvisible(X33)
| ~ genlmt(X33,X34)
| mtvisible(X34) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_1123])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
! [X22] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt)
& ~ inregion(X22,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X47] :
( ~ geolevel_4(X47)
| geographicalregion(X47) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_462])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_464])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( mtvisible(X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( geographicalregion(X1)
| ~ geolevel_4(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_326]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X23,X24] :
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X23,X24)
| inregion(X24,X23) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_128])])]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X42] :
( ~ geographicalregion(X42)
| geographicalsubregions(X42,X42) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_1042])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( geographicalregion(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( inregion(X2,X1)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,X1)
| ~ geographicalregion(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
geographicalregion(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : CSR057+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sun May 19 02:11:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.51 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.55 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.55 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.21/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.21/0.55 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.21/0.55 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.55 # new_bool_1 with pid 4027 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.55 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.21/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.55 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.21/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.21/0.55 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.21/0.55 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.55 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.55 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.21/0.55 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.55 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 61s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.55 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 4032 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.55 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.21/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.55 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.21/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.21/0.55 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.21/0.55 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.55 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.55 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.21/0.55 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.55 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 61s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.55 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.55 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.55
% 0.21/0.55 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.55 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.55 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.55 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.21/0.55 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1100
% 0.21/0.55 # Initial clauses : 33
% 0.21/0.55 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.55 # Initial clauses in saturation : 33
% 0.21/0.55 # Processed clauses : 77
% 0.21/0.55 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.21/0.55 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.55 # ...remaining for further processing : 75
% 0.21/0.55 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.55 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.55 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.55 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.21/0.55 # Generated clauses : 21
% 0.21/0.55 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 20
% 0.21/0.55 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.55 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.55 # Paramodulations : 21
% 0.21/0.55 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.55 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.55 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.55 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.55 # Total rewrite steps : 7
% 0.21/0.55 # ...of those cached : 4
% 0.21/0.55 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.55 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.55 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.55 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.55 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.55 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.55 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.55 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.55 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.55 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.55 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.55 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.55 # Current number of processed clauses : 40
% 0.21/0.55 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 12
% 0.21/0.55 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.55 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.21/0.55 # Non-unit-clauses : 25
% 0.21/0.55 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9
% 0.21/0.55 # ...number of literals in the above : 18
% 0.21/0.55 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.55 # Current number of archived clauses : 35
% 0.21/0.55 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 125
% 0.21/0.55 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 123
% 0.21/0.55 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.55 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 25
% 0.21/0.55 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.55 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.21/0.55 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.21/0.55 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.55 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.55 # Termbank termtop insertions : 8945
% 0.21/0.55 # Search garbage collected termcells : 4939
% 0.21/0.55
% 0.21/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.55 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.55 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.55 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.21/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 4008 pages
% 0.21/0.55
% 0.21/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.55 # User time : 0.026 s
% 0.21/0.55 # System time : 0.014 s
% 0.21/0.55 # Total time : 0.040 s
% 0.21/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 2652 pages
% 0.21/0.55 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------