TSTP Solution File: CSR056+5 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR056+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:08 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 20.29s 12.84s
% Output : CNFRefutation 20.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 21 RR)
% Number of literals : 34 ( 0 equ; 17 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2473,plain,
( tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_17(n_385))
| ~ supplies(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rqu3ljju/input.p',i_0_2473) ).
cnf(i_0_2864,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rqu3ljju/input.p',i_0_2864) ).
cnf(i_0_2863,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpofobject(c_tptpartsupplies,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rqu3ljju/input.p',i_0_2863) ).
cnf(i_0_2430,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rqu3ljju/input.p',i_0_2430) ).
cnf(i_0_25,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3717_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rqu3ljju/input.p',i_0_25) ).
cnf(i_0_1295,plain,
( supplies(X1)
| ~ artsupplies(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rqu3ljju/input.p',i_0_1295) ).
cnf(i_0_867,plain,
( artsupplies(c_tptpartsupplies)
| ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rqu3ljju/input.p',i_0_867) ).
cnf(i_0_614,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rqu3ljju/input.p',i_0_614) ).
cnf(c_0_2873,plain,
( tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_17(n_385))
| ~ supplies(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt) ),
i_0_2473 ).
cnf(c_0_2874,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt),
i_0_2864 ).
cnf(c_0_2875,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpofobject(c_tptpartsupplies,X1),
i_0_2863 ).
cnf(c_0_2876,plain,
( tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_17(n_385))
| ~ supplies(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2873,c_0_2874])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2877,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
i_0_2430 ).
cnf(c_0_2878,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3717_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
i_0_25 ).
cnf(c_0_2879,plain,
( supplies(X1)
| ~ artsupplies(X1) ),
i_0_1295 ).
cnf(c_0_2880,plain,
( artsupplies(c_tptpartsupplies)
| ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
i_0_867 ).
cnf(c_0_2881,negated_conjecture,
~ supplies(c_tptpartsupplies),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2875,c_0_2876]) ).
cnf(c_0_2882,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
i_0_614 ).
cnf(c_0_2883,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2877,c_0_2878]),c_0_2874])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2884,plain,
~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2879,c_0_2880]),c_0_2881]) ).
cnf(c_0_2885,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2877,c_0_2882]),c_0_2883])]),c_0_2884]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR056+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 07:08:23 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 9.43/9.59 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.43/9.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 9.43/9.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 9.43/9.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 20.29/12.84 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 20.29/12.84 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 20.29/12.84 # Preprocessing time : 0.074 s
% 20.29/12.84
% 20.29/12.84 # Proof found!
% 20.29/12.84 # SZS status Theorem
% 20.29/12.84 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 20.29/12.84 # Proof object total steps : 21
% 20.29/12.84 # Proof object clause steps : 13
% 20.29/12.84 # Proof object formula steps : 8
% 20.29/12.84 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 20.29/12.84 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 20.29/12.84 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 20.29/12.84 # Proof object initial clauses used : 8
% 20.29/12.84 # Proof object initial formulas used : 8
% 20.29/12.84 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 20.29/12.84 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 8
% 20.29/12.84 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 20.29/12.84 # Parsed axioms : 2862
% 20.29/12.84 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 20.29/12.84 # Initial clauses : 2862
% 20.29/12.84 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 20.29/12.84 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2862
% 20.29/12.84 # Processed clauses : 3251
% 20.29/12.84 # ...of these trivial : 179
% 20.29/12.84 # ...subsumed : 79
% 20.29/12.84 # ...remaining for further processing : 2992
% 20.29/12.84 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5
% 20.29/12.84 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 20.29/12.84 # Backward-subsumed : 6
% 20.29/12.84 # Backward-rewritten : 187
% 20.29/12.84 # Generated clauses : 5535
% 20.29/12.84 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 5132
% 20.29/12.84 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 3
% 20.29/12.84 # Paramodulations : 5530
% 20.29/12.84 # Factorizations : 0
% 20.29/12.84 # Equation resolutions : 5
% 20.29/12.84 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 20.29/12.84 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 20.29/12.84 # Current number of processed clauses : 2794
% 20.29/12.84 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1347
% 20.29/12.84 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 20.29/12.84 # Negative unit clauses : 149
% 20.29/12.84 # Non-unit-clauses : 1298
% 20.29/12.84 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4325
% 20.29/12.84 # ...number of literals in the above : 6895
% 20.29/12.84 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 20.29/12.84 # Current number of archived clauses : 193
% 20.29/12.84 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 268206
% 20.29/12.84 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 204981
% 20.29/12.84 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 68
% 20.29/12.84 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 130727
% 20.29/12.84 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 20.29/12.84 # BW rewrite match attempts : 285
% 20.29/12.84 # BW rewrite match successes : 113
% 20.29/12.84 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 20.29/12.84 # Condensation successes : 0
% 20.29/12.84 # Termbank termtop insertions : 87060
% 20.29/12.84
% 20.29/12.84 # -------------------------------------------------
% 20.29/12.84 # User time : 0.298 s
% 20.29/12.84 # System time : 0.017 s
% 20.29/12.84 # Total time : 0.315 s
% 20.29/12.84 # ...preprocessing : 0.074 s
% 20.29/12.84 # ...main loop : 0.241 s
% 20.29/12.84 # Maximum resident set size: 25312 pages
% 20.29/12.84
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------