TSTP Solution File: CSR056+3 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR056+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:08 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 9.20s 3.22s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 9.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   22 (  13 unt;   0 nHn;  22 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   35 (   0 equ;  16 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2445,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vs2cbr0u/input.p',i_0_2445) ).

cnf(i_0_1022,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_member3717_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vs2cbr0u/input.p',i_0_1022) ).

cnf(i_0_2541,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vs2cbr0u/input.p',i_0_2541) ).

cnf(i_0_1144,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vs2cbr0u/input.p',i_0_1144) ).

cnf(i_0_2475,plain,
    ( tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_17(n_385))
    | ~ supplies(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vs2cbr0u/input.p',i_0_2475) ).

cnf(i_0_344,plain,
    ( artsupplies(c_tptpartsupplies)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vs2cbr0u/input.p',i_0_344) ).

cnf(i_0_2540,negated_conjecture,
    ~ tptpofobject(c_tptpartsupplies,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vs2cbr0u/input.p',i_0_2540) ).

cnf(i_0_161,plain,
    ( supplies(X1)
    | ~ artsupplies(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vs2cbr0u/input.p',i_0_161) ).

cnf(c_0_2550,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_2445 ).

cnf(c_0_2551,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_member3717_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
    i_0_1022 ).

cnf(c_0_2552,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt),
    i_0_2541 ).

cnf(c_0_2553,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
    i_0_1144 ).

cnf(c_0_2554,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2550,c_0_2551]),c_0_2552])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2555,plain,
    ( tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_17(n_385))
    | ~ supplies(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt) ),
    i_0_2475 ).

cnf(c_0_2556,plain,
    ( artsupplies(c_tptpartsupplies)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
    i_0_344 ).

cnf(c_0_2557,plain,
    mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2550,c_0_2553]),c_0_2554])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2558,negated_conjecture,
    ~ tptpofobject(c_tptpartsupplies,X1),
    i_0_2540 ).

cnf(c_0_2559,plain,
    ( tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_17(n_385))
    | ~ supplies(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2555,c_0_2552])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2560,plain,
    ( supplies(X1)
    | ~ artsupplies(X1) ),
    i_0_161 ).

cnf(c_0_2561,plain,
    artsupplies(c_tptpartsupplies),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2556,c_0_2557])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2562,negated_conjecture,
    ~ supplies(c_tptpartsupplies),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2558,c_0_2559]) ).

cnf(c_0_2563,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2560,c_0_2561]),c_0_2562]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem  : CSR056+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.10/0.11  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 16:45:49 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.43  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.57  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.57  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.18/0.57  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.18/0.57  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 9.20/3.22  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 9.20/3.22  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 9.20/3.22  # Preprocessing time       : 0.052 s
% 9.20/3.22  
% 9.20/3.22  # Proof found!
% 9.20/3.22  # SZS status Theorem
% 9.20/3.22  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.20/3.22  # Proof object total steps             : 22
% 9.20/3.22  # Proof object clause steps            : 14
% 9.20/3.22  # Proof object formula steps           : 8
% 9.20/3.22  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 9.20/3.22  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 3
% 9.20/3.22  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 2
% 9.20/3.22  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 8
% 9.20/3.22  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 8
% 9.20/3.22  # Proof object generating inferences   : 4
% 9.20/3.22  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 9
% 9.20/3.22  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.20/3.22  # Parsed axioms                        : 2541
% 9.20/3.22  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 9.20/3.22  # Initial clauses                      : 2541
% 9.20/3.22  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 9.20/3.22  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 2541
% 9.20/3.22  # Processed clauses                    : 2896
% 9.20/3.22  # ...of these trivial                  : 213
% 9.20/3.22  # ...subsumed                          : 193
% 9.20/3.22  # ...remaining for further processing  : 2490
% 9.20/3.22  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 9.20/3.22  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 9.20/3.22  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 9.20/3.22  # Backward-rewritten                   : 94
% 9.20/3.22  # Generated clauses                    : 5677
% 9.20/3.22  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 5308
% 9.20/3.22  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 9
% 9.20/3.22  # Paramodulations                      : 5677
% 9.20/3.22  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 9.20/3.22  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 9.20/3.22  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 9.20/3.22  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 9.20/3.22  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2394
% 9.20/3.22  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 826
% 9.20/3.22  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 9.20/3.22  #    Negative unit clauses             : 66
% 9.20/3.22  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1502
% 9.20/3.22  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4779
% 9.20/3.22  # ...number of literals in the above   : 8826
% 9.20/3.22  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 9.20/3.22  # Current number of archived clauses   : 96
% 9.20/3.22  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 381503
% 9.20/3.22  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 348538
% 9.20/3.22  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 198
% 9.20/3.22  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 41240
% 9.20/3.22  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 9.20/3.22  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 31
% 9.20/3.22  # BW rewrite match successes           : 10
% 9.20/3.22  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 9.20/3.22  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 9.20/3.22  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 83992
% 9.20/3.22  
% 9.20/3.22  # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.20/3.22  # User time                : 0.219 s
% 9.20/3.22  # System time              : 0.011 s
% 9.20/3.22  # Total time               : 0.230 s
% 9.20/3.22  # ...preprocessing         : 0.052 s
% 9.20/3.22  # ...main loop             : 0.178 s
% 9.20/3.22  # Maximum resident set size: 20064 pages
% 9.20/3.22  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------