TSTP Solution File: CSR056+3 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : CSR056+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:56 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.81s 1.99s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.81s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   49 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   39 (  17   ~;  13   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (   1 sgn   9   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query156,conjecture,
    ? [X23] :
      ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt)
     => tptpofobject(c_tptpartsupplies,X23) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query156) ).

fof(ax2_7997,axiom,
    ! [X21,X22] :
      ( ( mtvisible(X21)
        & genlmt(X21,X22) )
     => mtvisible(X22) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7997) ).

fof(ax2_856,axiom,
    genlmt(c_tptp_member3717_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_856) ).

fof(ax2_842,axiom,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt)
        & supplies(X2) )
     => tptpofobject(X2,f_tptpquantityfn_17(n_385)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_842) ).

fof(ax2_1986,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
   => artsupplies(c_tptpartsupplies) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1986) ).

fof(ax2_4288,axiom,
    genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_4288) ).

fof(ax2_1480,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( artsupplies(X1)
     => supplies(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1480) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X23] :
        ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt)
       => tptpofobject(c_tptpartsupplies,X23) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query156]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X23,X24] :
      ( ~ mtvisible(X23)
      | ~ genlmt(X23,X24)
      | mtvisible(X24) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7997])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X24] :
      ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt)
      & ~ tptpofobject(c_tptpartsupplies,X24) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_member3717_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_856]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X3] :
      ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt)
      | ~ supplies(X3)
      | tptpofobject(X3,f_tptpquantityfn_17(n_385)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_842])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
    | artsupplies(c_tptpartsupplies) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1986]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_4288]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_17(n_385))
    | ~ supplies(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ artsupplies(X2)
      | supplies(X2) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1480])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( artsupplies(c_tptpartsupplies)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ tptpofobject(c_tptpartsupplies,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_17(n_385))
    | ~ supplies(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( supplies(X1)
    | ~ artsupplies(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    artsupplies(c_tptpartsupplies),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ~ supplies(c_tptpartsupplies),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : CSR056+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 16:41:40 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.81/1.99  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.81/1.99  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.81/1.99  # Preprocessing time       : 0.152 s
% 0.81/1.99  
% 0.81/1.99  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.81/1.99  # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.81/1.99  # Parsed axioms                        : 8006
% 0.81/1.99  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 7977
% 0.81/1.99  # Initial clauses                      : 30
% 0.81/1.99  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 30
% 0.81/1.99  # Processed clauses                    : 54
% 0.81/1.99  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.81/1.99  # ...subsumed                          : 8
% 0.81/1.99  # ...remaining for further processing  : 44
% 0.81/1.99  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.81/1.99  # Generated clauses                    : 37
% 0.81/1.99  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 25
% 0.81/1.99  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Paramodulations                      : 37
% 0.81/1.99  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Current number of processed clauses  : 42
% 0.81/1.99  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 16
% 0.81/1.99  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.81/1.99  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.81/1.99  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 25
% 0.81/1.99  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.81/1.99  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.81/1.99  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 76
% 0.81/1.99  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 76
% 0.81/1.99  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 8
% 0.81/1.99  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.81/1.99  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.81/1.99  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.81/1.99  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 52328
% 0.81/1.99  
% 0.81/1.99  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.81/1.99  # User time                : 0.131 s
% 0.81/1.99  # System time              : 0.022 s
% 0.81/1.99  # Total time               : 0.153 s
% 0.81/1.99  # Maximum resident set size: 19676 pages
% 0.81/1.99  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.81/1.99  # Preprocessing time       : 0.172 s
% 0.81/1.99  
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof found!
% 0.81/1.99  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.81/1.99  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object total steps             : 27
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object clause steps            : 14
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object formula steps           : 13
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object conjectures             : 6
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 3
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 8
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 7
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object generating inferences   : 4
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 9
% 0.81/1.99  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.81/1.99  # Parsed axioms                        : 8006
% 0.81/1.99  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Initial clauses                      : 8007
% 0.81/1.99  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 8007
% 0.81/1.99  # Processed clauses                    : 8669
% 0.81/1.99  # ...of these trivial                  : 557
% 0.81/1.99  # ...subsumed                          : 344
% 0.81/1.99  # ...remaining for further processing  : 7768
% 0.81/1.99  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 0.81/1.99  # Backward-rewritten                   : 161
% 0.81/1.99  # Generated clauses                    : 23437
% 0.81/1.99  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 21848
% 0.81/1.99  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 20
% 0.81/1.99  # Paramodulations                      : 23437
% 0.81/1.99  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Current number of processed clauses  : 7604
% 0.81/1.99  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3017
% 0.81/1.99  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.81/1.99  #    Negative unit clauses             : 110
% 0.81/1.99  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 4477
% 0.81/1.99  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 20874
% 0.81/1.99  # ...number of literals in the above   : 37590
% 0.81/1.99  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Current number of archived clauses   : 164
% 0.81/1.99  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2711436
% 0.81/1.99  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2542032
% 0.81/1.99  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 365
% 0.81/1.99  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 256460
% 0.81/1.99  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2600
% 0.81/1.99  # BW rewrite match successes           : 36
% 0.81/1.99  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 492076
% 0.81/1.99  
% 0.81/1.99  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.81/1.99  # User time                : 0.763 s
% 0.81/1.99  # System time              : 0.039 s
% 0.81/1.99  # Total time               : 0.802 s
% 0.81/1.99  # Maximum resident set size: 68680 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------