TSTP Solution File: CSR054+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR054+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.28s 1.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.28s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 1 sgn 1 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query104,conjecture,
? [X13] :
( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
=> tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),X13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query104) ).
fof(ax1_217,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
=> tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),f_tptpquantityfn_21(n_170)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_217) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X13] :
( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
=> tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),X13) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query104]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
| tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),f_tptpquantityfn_21(n_170)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_217]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X14] :
( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
& ~ tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),X14) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),f_tptpquantityfn_21(n_170))
| ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : CSR054+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 14:56:37 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.28/1.45 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.28/1.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.28/1.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.033 s
% 0.28/1.45
% 0.28/1.45 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.28/1.45 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.28/1.45 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.28/1.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1056
% 0.28/1.45 # Initial clauses : 77
% 0.28/1.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 77
% 0.28/1.45 # Processed clauses : 79
% 0.28/1.45 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # ...subsumed : 9
% 0.28/1.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 70
% 0.28/1.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Generated clauses : 13
% 0.28/1.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 2
% 0.28/1.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Paramodulations : 13
% 0.28/1.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 70
% 0.28/1.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 41
% 0.28/1.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.28/1.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 27
% 0.28/1.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.28/1.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 101
% 0.28/1.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 96
% 0.28/1.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 9
% 0.28/1.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15
% 0.28/1.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10511
% 0.28/1.45
% 0.28/1.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/1.45 # User time : 0.030 s
% 0.28/1.45 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.28/1.45 # Total time : 0.035 s
% 0.28/1.45 # Maximum resident set size: 5472 pages
% 0.28/1.45 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.28/1.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.051 s
% 0.28/1.45
% 0.28/1.45 # Proof found!
% 0.28/1.45 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.28/1.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.28/1.45 # Proof object total steps : 9
% 0.28/1.45 # Proof object clause steps : 4
% 0.28/1.45 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.28/1.45 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.28/1.45 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.28/1.45 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.28/1.45 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 0.28/1.45 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.28/1.45 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 0.28/1.45 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.28/1.45 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.28/1.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Initial clauses : 1133
% 0.28/1.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1133
% 0.28/1.45 # Processed clauses : 528
% 0.28/1.45 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.28/1.45 # ...subsumed : 8
% 0.28/1.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 518
% 0.28/1.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Generated clauses : 137
% 0.28/1.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 121
% 0.28/1.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Paramodulations : 137
% 0.28/1.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 518
% 0.28/1.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 291
% 0.28/1.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.28/1.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 223
% 0.28/1.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 726
% 0.28/1.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 1422
% 0.28/1.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.28/1.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10710
% 0.28/1.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10396
% 0.28/1.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 0.28/1.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 347
% 0.28/1.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.28/1.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 45525
% 0.28/1.46
% 0.28/1.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/1.46 # User time : 0.064 s
% 0.28/1.46 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.28/1.46 # Total time : 0.069 s
% 0.28/1.46 # Maximum resident set size: 8756 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------