TSTP Solution File: CSR053+4 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR053+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:35:30 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 18.14s 17.76s
% Output : CNFRefutation 18.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query203,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Wp3ijH4ybH/E---3.1_14494.p',query203) ).
fof(ax3_6834,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Wp3ijH4ybH/E---3.1_14494.p',ax3_6834) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query203]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_6834])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
& ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR053+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 14:37:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 16.59/17.01 Running first-order model finding
% 16.59/17.01 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Wp3ijH4ybH/E---3.1_14494.p
% 18.14/17.76 # Version: 3.1.0
% 18.14/17.76 # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 18.14/17.76 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 18.14/17.76 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 18.14/17.76 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 18.14/17.76 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 18.14/17.76 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 18.14/17.76 # sh5l with pid 14574 completed with status 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Result found by sh5l
% 18.14/17.76 # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 18.14/17.76 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 18.14/17.76 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 18.14/17.76 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 18.14/17.76 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 18.14/17.76 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 18.14/17.76 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 18.14/17.76 # Search class: FHHNM-FSMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 18.14/17.76 # partial match(2): FGHSM-FSMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 18.14/17.76 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 18.14/17.76 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 181s (1) cores
% 18.14/17.76 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with pid 14577 completed with status 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N
% 18.14/17.76 # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 18.14/17.76 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 18.14/17.76 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 18.14/17.76 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 18.14/17.76 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 18.14/17.76 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 18.14/17.76 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 18.14/17.76 # Search class: FHHNM-FSMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 18.14/17.76 # partial match(2): FGHSM-FSMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 18.14/17.76 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 18.14/17.76 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 181s (1) cores
% 18.14/17.76 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 18.14/17.76 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 18.14/17.76
% 18.14/17.76 # Proof found!
% 18.14/17.76 # SZS status Theorem
% 18.14/17.76 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 18.14/17.76 # Parsed axioms : 44217
% 18.14/17.76 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 43958
% 18.14/17.76 # Initial clauses : 260
% 18.14/17.76 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Initial clauses in saturation : 260
% 18.14/17.76 # Processed clauses : 3
% 18.14/17.76 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # ...subsumed : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 18.14/17.76 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Generated clauses : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Paramodulations : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Factorizations : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # NegExts : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 18.14/17.76 # ...of those cached : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Propositional check models : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 18.14/17.76 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 18.14/17.76 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 18.14/17.76 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 18.14/17.76 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 18.14/17.76 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 18.14/17.76 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 18.14/17.76 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 18.14/17.76 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 18.14/17.76 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 257
% 18.14/17.76 # ...number of literals in the above : 446
% 18.14/17.76 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Condensation successes : 0
% 18.14/17.76 # Termbank termtop insertions : 301011
% 18.14/17.76 # Search garbage collected termcells : 158149
% 18.14/17.76
% 18.14/17.76 # -------------------------------------------------
% 18.14/17.76 # User time : 0.165 s
% 18.14/17.76 # System time : 0.054 s
% 18.14/17.76 # Total time : 0.220 s
% 18.14/17.76 # Maximum resident set size: 82220 pages
% 18.14/17.76
% 18.14/17.76 # -------------------------------------------------
% 18.14/17.76 # User time : 0.626 s
% 18.14/17.76 # System time : 0.090 s
% 18.14/17.76 # Total time : 0.717 s
% 18.14/17.76 # Maximum resident set size: 34600 pages
% 18.14/17.76 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------