TSTP Solution File: CSR053+4 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR053+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:31:47 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 25.73s 26.20s
% Output : CNFRefutation 25.73s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query203,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lR6RPc2qBh/E---3.1_11034.p',query203) ).
fof(ax3_6834,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lR6RPc2qBh/E---3.1_11034.p',ax3_6834) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query203]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_6834])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
& ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 12.43/12.49 % Problem : CSR053+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 12.49/12.51 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 12.53/12.71 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 12.53/12.71 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 12.53/12.71 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 12.53/12.71 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 12.53/12.71 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 12.53/12.71 % CPULimit : 300
% 12.53/12.71 % WCLimit : 300
% 12.53/12.71 % DateTime : Fri May 3 14:37:35 EDT 2024
% 12.53/12.71 % CPUTime :
% 25.16/25.39 Running first-order theorem proving
% 25.16/25.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lR6RPc2qBh/E---3.1_11034.p
% 25.73/26.20 # Version: 3.1.0
% 25.73/26.20 # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 25.73/26.20 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 25.73/26.20 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 25.73/26.20 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 25.73/26.20 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 25.73/26.20 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 25.73/26.20 # sh5l with pid 11799 completed with status 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Result found by sh5l
% 25.73/26.20 # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 25.73/26.20 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 25.73/26.20 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 25.73/26.20 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 25.73/26.20 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 25.73/26.20 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 25.73/26.20 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 25.73/26.20 # Search class: FHHNM-FSMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 25.73/26.20 # partial match(2): FGHSM-FSMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 25.73/26.20 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 25.73/26.20 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 181s (1) cores
% 25.73/26.20 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with pid 11802 completed with status 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N
% 25.73/26.20 # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 25.73/26.20 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 25.73/26.20 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 25.73/26.20 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 25.73/26.20 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 25.73/26.20 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 25.73/26.20 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 25.73/26.20 # Search class: FHHNM-FSMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 25.73/26.20 # partial match(2): FGHSM-FSMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 25.73/26.20 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 25.73/26.20 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 181s (1) cores
% 25.73/26.20 # Preprocessing time : 0.022 s
% 25.73/26.20 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 25.73/26.20
% 25.73/26.20 # Proof found!
% 25.73/26.20 # SZS status Theorem
% 25.73/26.20 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 25.73/26.20 # Parsed axioms : 44217
% 25.73/26.20 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 43958
% 25.73/26.20 # Initial clauses : 260
% 25.73/26.20 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Initial clauses in saturation : 260
% 25.73/26.20 # Processed clauses : 3
% 25.73/26.20 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # ...subsumed : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 25.73/26.20 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Generated clauses : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Paramodulations : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Factorizations : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # NegExts : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 25.73/26.20 # ...of those cached : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Propositional check models : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 25.73/26.20 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 25.73/26.20 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 25.73/26.20 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 25.73/26.20 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 25.73/26.20 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 25.73/26.20 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 25.73/26.20 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 25.73/26.20 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 25.73/26.20 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 257
% 25.73/26.20 # ...number of literals in the above : 446
% 25.73/26.20 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Condensation successes : 0
% 25.73/26.20 # Termbank termtop insertions : 301011
% 25.73/26.20 # Search garbage collected termcells : 158149
% 25.73/26.20
% 25.73/26.20 # -------------------------------------------------
% 25.73/26.20 # User time : 0.174 s
% 25.73/26.20 # System time : 0.070 s
% 25.73/26.20 # Total time : 0.244 s
% 25.73/26.20 # Maximum resident set size: 82216 pages
% 25.73/26.20
% 25.73/26.20 # -------------------------------------------------
% 25.73/26.20 # User time : 0.679 s
% 25.73/26.20 # System time : 0.103 s
% 25.73/26.20 # Total time : 0.782 s
% 25.73/26.20 # Maximum resident set size: 34596 pages
% 25.73/26.20 % E---3.1 exiting
% 25.73/26.20 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------