TSTP Solution File: CSR053+4 by Drodi---3.6.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Drodi---3.6.0
% Problem  : CSR053+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : drodi -learnfrom(drodi.lrn) -timeout(%d) %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 20:14:41 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 5.98s 1.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.98s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   31 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   23 (  10   ~;   7   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f6834,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
   => geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f44217,conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
   => geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f44218,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
     => geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f44217]) ).

fof(f52799,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
    | geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
    inference(pre_NNF_transformation,[status(esa)],[f6834]) ).

fof(f52800,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
    | geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f52799]) ).

fof(f110738,plain,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
    & ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
    inference(pre_NNF_transformation,[status(esa)],[f44218]) ).

fof(f110739,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f110738]) ).

fof(f110740,plain,
    ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f110738]) ).

fof(f110875,plain,
    ( spl0_37
  <=> mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) ),
    introduced(split_symbol_definition) ).

fof(f110877,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
    | spl0_37 ),
    inference(component_clause,[status(thm)],[f110875]) ).

fof(f112644,plain,
    ( spl0_500
  <=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
    introduced(split_symbol_definition) ).

fof(f112645,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7)
    | ~ spl0_500 ),
    inference(component_clause,[status(thm)],[f112644]) ).

fof(f112647,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_37
    | spl0_500 ),
    inference(split_clause,[status(thm)],[f52800,f110875,f112644]) ).

fof(f118329,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_500 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f112645,f110740]) ).

fof(f118330,plain,
    ~ spl0_500,
    inference(contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f118329]) ).

fof(f118608,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl0_37 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f110877,f110739]) ).

fof(f118609,plain,
    spl0_37,
    inference(contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f118608]) ).

fof(f118610,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f112647,f118330,f118609]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : CSR053+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : drodi -learnfrom(drodi.lrn) -timeout(%d) %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Apr 29 23:40:35 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.70/0.91  % Drodi V3.6.0
% 5.98/1.63  % Refutation found
% 5.98/1.63  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark: Theorem is valid
% 5.98/1.63  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 7.23/1.79  % Elapsed time: 1.409754 seconds
% 7.23/1.79  % CPU time: 5.132280 seconds
% 7.23/1.79  % Total memory used: 1.843 GB
% 7.23/1.79  % Net memory used: 1.833 GB
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------