TSTP Solution File: CSR053+2 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR053+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:31:46 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.53s 0.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.53s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query103,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.BxmmIvwB8c/E---3.1_12216.p',query103) ).
fof(ax1_249,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.BxmmIvwB8c/E---3.1_12216.p',ax1_249) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query103]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_249])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
& ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.19 % Problem : CSR053+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.13/0.20 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.19/0.41 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.41 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.41 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.41 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.19/0.41 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.19/0.41 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.41 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/0.41 % DateTime : Fri May 3 14:49:08 EDT 2024
% 0.19/0.41 % CPUTime :
% 0.44/0.60 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.44/0.60 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.BxmmIvwB8c/E---3.1_12216.p
% 0.53/0.63 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.53/0.63 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.53/0.63 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.53/0.63 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.53/0.63 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.53/0.63 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.53/0.63 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.63 # new_bool_3 with pid 12296 completed with status 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.53/0.63 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.53/0.63 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.53/0.63 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.53/0.63 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.53/0.63 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.53/0.63 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.53/0.63 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.53/0.63 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.63 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 61s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.63 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 12299 completed with status 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.53/0.63 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.53/0.63 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.53/0.63 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.53/0.63 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.53/0.63 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.53/0.63 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.53/0.63 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.53/0.63 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.63 # Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.53/0.63 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.53/0.63
% 0.53/0.63 # Proof found!
% 0.53/0.63 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.53/0.63 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.53/0.63 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.53/0.63 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1125
% 0.53/0.63 # Initial clauses : 8
% 0.53/0.63 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.53/0.63 # Processed clauses : 3
% 0.53/0.63 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.53/0.63 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # NegExts : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.53/0.63 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.53/0.63 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.53/0.63 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.53/0.63 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.53/0.63 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.53/0.63 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.53/0.63 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.53/0.63 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.53/0.63 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.53/0.63 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5
% 0.53/0.63 # ...number of literals in the above : 11
% 0.53/0.63 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.53/0.63 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7564
% 0.53/0.63 # Search garbage collected termcells : 4859
% 0.53/0.63
% 0.53/0.63 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.63 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.53/0.63 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.53/0.63 # Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.53/0.63 # Maximum resident set size: 4044 pages
% 0.53/0.63
% 0.53/0.63 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.63 # User time : 0.021 s
% 0.53/0.63 # System time : 0.017 s
% 0.53/0.63 # Total time : 0.038 s
% 0.53/0.63 # Maximum resident set size: 2660 pages
% 0.53/0.63 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.53/0.64 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------