TSTP Solution File: CSR052+3 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR052+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:04 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.98s 3.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.98s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   34 (  19 unt;   0 nHn;  34 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   57 (   0 equ;  25 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   9 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2508,plain,
    ( genls(X1,X2)
    | ~ genls(X1,X3)
    | ~ genls(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bog5dmzw/input.p',i_0_2508) ).

cnf(i_0_368,plain,
    genls(c_tptpcol_8_39940,c_tptpcol_7_39939),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bog5dmzw/input.p',i_0_368) ).

cnf(i_0_373,plain,
    genls(c_tptpcol_9_40196,c_tptpcol_8_39940),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bog5dmzw/input.p',i_0_373) ).

cnf(i_0_277,plain,
    genls(c_tptpcol_10_40324,c_tptpcol_9_40196),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bog5dmzw/input.p',i_0_277) ).

cnf(i_0_198,plain,
    genls(c_tptpcol_11_40388,c_tptpcol_10_40324),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bog5dmzw/input.p',i_0_198) ).

cnf(i_0_297,plain,
    genls(c_tptpcol_12_40420,c_tptpcol_11_40388),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bog5dmzw/input.p',i_0_297) ).

cnf(i_0_956,plain,
    genls(c_tptpcol_13_40421,c_tptpcol_12_40420),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bog5dmzw/input.p',i_0_956) ).

cnf(i_0_451,plain,
    genls(c_tptpcol_14_40429,c_tptpcol_13_40421),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bog5dmzw/input.p',i_0_451) ).

cnf(i_0_2608,negated_conjecture,
    ~ genls(c_tptpcol_15_40430,c_tptpcol_7_39939),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bog5dmzw/input.p',i_0_2608) ).

cnf(i_0_1077,plain,
    genls(c_tptpcol_15_40430,c_tptpcol_14_40429),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bog5dmzw/input.p',i_0_1077) ).

cnf(c_0_2619,plain,
    ( genls(X1,X2)
    | ~ genls(X1,X3)
    | ~ genls(X3,X2) ),
    i_0_2508 ).

cnf(c_0_2620,plain,
    genls(c_tptpcol_8_39940,c_tptpcol_7_39939),
    i_0_368 ).

cnf(c_0_2621,plain,
    ( genls(X1,c_tptpcol_7_39939)
    | ~ genls(X1,c_tptpcol_8_39940) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2619,c_0_2620]) ).

cnf(c_0_2622,plain,
    ( genls(X1,c_tptpcol_7_39939)
    | ~ genls(X2,c_tptpcol_8_39940)
    | ~ genls(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2619,c_0_2621]) ).

cnf(c_0_2623,plain,
    genls(c_tptpcol_9_40196,c_tptpcol_8_39940),
    i_0_373 ).

cnf(c_0_2624,plain,
    ( genls(X1,c_tptpcol_7_39939)
    | ~ genls(X1,c_tptpcol_9_40196) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2622,c_0_2623]) ).

cnf(c_0_2625,plain,
    ( genls(X1,c_tptpcol_7_39939)
    | ~ genls(X2,c_tptpcol_9_40196)
    | ~ genls(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2619,c_0_2624]) ).

cnf(c_0_2626,plain,
    genls(c_tptpcol_10_40324,c_tptpcol_9_40196),
    i_0_277 ).

cnf(c_0_2627,plain,
    ( genls(X1,c_tptpcol_7_39939)
    | ~ genls(X1,c_tptpcol_10_40324) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2625,c_0_2626]) ).

cnf(c_0_2628,plain,
    ( genls(X1,c_tptpcol_7_39939)
    | ~ genls(X2,c_tptpcol_10_40324)
    | ~ genls(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2619,c_0_2627]) ).

cnf(c_0_2629,plain,
    genls(c_tptpcol_11_40388,c_tptpcol_10_40324),
    i_0_198 ).

cnf(c_0_2630,plain,
    ( genls(X1,c_tptpcol_7_39939)
    | ~ genls(X1,c_tptpcol_11_40388) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2628,c_0_2629]) ).

cnf(c_0_2631,plain,
    ( genls(X1,c_tptpcol_7_39939)
    | ~ genls(X2,c_tptpcol_11_40388)
    | ~ genls(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2619,c_0_2630]) ).

cnf(c_0_2632,plain,
    genls(c_tptpcol_12_40420,c_tptpcol_11_40388),
    i_0_297 ).

cnf(c_0_2633,plain,
    ( genls(X1,c_tptpcol_7_39939)
    | ~ genls(X1,c_tptpcol_12_40420) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2631,c_0_2632]) ).

cnf(c_0_2634,plain,
    ( genls(X1,c_tptpcol_7_39939)
    | ~ genls(X2,c_tptpcol_12_40420)
    | ~ genls(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2619,c_0_2633]) ).

cnf(c_0_2635,plain,
    genls(c_tptpcol_13_40421,c_tptpcol_12_40420),
    i_0_956 ).

cnf(c_0_2636,plain,
    ( genls(X1,c_tptpcol_7_39939)
    | ~ genls(X1,c_tptpcol_13_40421) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2634,c_0_2635]) ).

cnf(c_0_2637,plain,
    ( genls(X1,c_tptpcol_7_39939)
    | ~ genls(X2,c_tptpcol_13_40421)
    | ~ genls(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2619,c_0_2636]) ).

cnf(c_0_2638,plain,
    genls(c_tptpcol_14_40429,c_tptpcol_13_40421),
    i_0_451 ).

cnf(c_0_2639,negated_conjecture,
    ~ genls(c_tptpcol_15_40430,c_tptpcol_7_39939),
    i_0_2608 ).

cnf(c_0_2640,plain,
    ( genls(X1,c_tptpcol_7_39939)
    | ~ genls(X1,c_tptpcol_14_40429) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2637,c_0_2638]) ).

cnf(c_0_2641,plain,
    genls(c_tptpcol_15_40430,c_tptpcol_14_40429),
    i_0_1077 ).

cnf(c_0_2642,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2639,c_0_2640]),c_0_2641])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : CSR052+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 09:11:23 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.20/0.59  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.59  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.20/0.59  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.20/0.59  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.98/3.27  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 8.98/3.27  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 8.98/3.27  # Preprocessing time       : 0.056 s
% 8.98/3.27  
% 8.98/3.27  # Proof found!
% 8.98/3.27  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.98/3.27  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.98/3.27  # Proof object total steps             : 34
% 8.98/3.27  # Proof object clause steps            : 24
% 8.98/3.27  # Proof object formula steps           : 10
% 8.98/3.27  # Proof object conjectures             : 3
% 8.98/3.27  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 8.98/3.27  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 1
% 8.98/3.27  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 10
% 8.98/3.27  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 10
% 8.98/3.27  # Proof object generating inferences   : 14
% 8.98/3.27  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 2
% 8.98/3.27  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.98/3.27  # Parsed axioms                        : 2609
% 8.98/3.27  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 8.98/3.27  # Initial clauses                      : 2609
% 8.98/3.27  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 8.98/3.27  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 2609
% 8.98/3.27  # Processed clauses                    : 2749
% 8.98/3.27  # ...of these trivial                  : 164
% 8.98/3.27  # ...subsumed                          : 178
% 8.98/3.27  # ...remaining for further processing  : 2407
% 8.98/3.27  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 8.98/3.27  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 8.98/3.27  # Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 8.98/3.27  # Backward-rewritten                   : 10
% 8.98/3.27  # Generated clauses                    : 3481
% 8.98/3.27  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 3016
% 8.98/3.27  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 13
% 8.98/3.27  # Paramodulations                      : 3481
% 8.98/3.27  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 8.98/3.27  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 8.98/3.27  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 8.98/3.27  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 8.98/3.27  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2394
% 8.98/3.27  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 901
% 8.98/3.27  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 8.98/3.27  #    Negative unit clauses             : 46
% 8.98/3.27  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1447
% 8.98/3.27  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2854
% 8.98/3.27  # ...number of literals in the above   : 4610
% 8.98/3.27  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 8.98/3.27  # Current number of archived clauses   : 13
% 8.98/3.27  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 251002
% 8.98/3.27  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 224484
% 8.98/3.27  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 193
% 8.98/3.27  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 34607
% 8.98/3.27  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 8.98/3.27  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 43
% 8.98/3.27  # BW rewrite match successes           : 6
% 8.98/3.27  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 8.98/3.27  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 8.98/3.27  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 63776
% 8.98/3.27  
% 8.98/3.27  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.98/3.27  # User time                : 0.187 s
% 8.98/3.27  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 8.98/3.27  # Total time               : 0.195 s
% 8.98/3.27  # ...preprocessing         : 0.056 s
% 8.98/3.27  # ...main loop             : 0.140 s
% 8.98/3.27  # Maximum resident set size: 18576 pages
% 8.98/3.27  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------