TSTP Solution File: CSR051+2 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : CSR051+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 02:11:28 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 1.87s 1.11s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   33 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   25 (  12   ~;   6   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   2 sgn   6   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f51,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3356_mt)
   => marriagelicensedocument(c_tptpmarriagelicensedocument) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1_51) ).

fof(f986,axiom,
    ! [X12] :
      ( marriagelicensedocument(X12)
     => isa(X12,c_marriagelicensedocument) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1_986) ).

fof(f1132,conjecture,
    ? [X12] :
      ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3356_mt)
     => marriagelicensedocument(X12) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query101) ).

fof(f1133,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X12] :
        ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3356_mt)
       => marriagelicensedocument(X12) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1132]) ).

fof(f1652,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( marriagelicensedocument(X0)
     => isa(X0,c_marriagelicensedocument) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f986]) ).

fof(f1796,plain,
    ~ ? [X0] :
        ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3356_mt)
       => marriagelicensedocument(X0) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1133]) ).

fof(f1914,plain,
    ( marriagelicensedocument(c_tptpmarriagelicensedocument)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member3356_mt) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).

fof(f2535,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( isa(X0,c_marriagelicensedocument)
      | ~ marriagelicensedocument(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1652]) ).

fof(f2685,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ marriagelicensedocument(X0)
      & mtvisible(c_tptp_member3356_mt) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1796]) ).

fof(f2736,plain,
    ( marriagelicensedocument(c_tptpmarriagelicensedocument)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member3356_mt) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1914]) ).

fof(f3589,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( isa(X0,c_marriagelicensedocument)
      | ~ marriagelicensedocument(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2535]) ).

fof(f3725,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_member3356_mt),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2685]) ).

fof(f3726,plain,
    ! [X0] : ~ marriagelicensedocument(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2685]) ).

cnf(c_99,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member3356_mt)
    | marriagelicensedocument(c_tptpmarriagelicensedocument) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2736]) ).

cnf(c_952,plain,
    ( ~ marriagelicensedocument(X0)
    | isa(X0,c_marriagelicensedocument) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3589]) ).

cnf(c_1088,negated_conjecture,
    ~ marriagelicensedocument(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3726]) ).

cnf(c_1089,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_member3356_mt),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3725]) ).

cnf(c_1725,plain,
    marriagelicensedocument(c_tptpmarriagelicensedocument),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_99,c_1089,c_99]) ).

cnf(c_1727,plain,
    ~ marriagelicensedocument(X0),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_952,c_1088]) ).

cnf(c_5409,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1725,c_1727]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem  : CSR051+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.10/0.11  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime : Thu May  2 23:11:41 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.87/1.11  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.87/1.11  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.87/1.11  
% 1.87/1.11  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 1.87/1.11  
% 1.87/1.11  ------  iProver source info
% 1.87/1.11  
% 1.87/1.11  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 1.87/1.11  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 1.87/1.11  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.87/1.11  
% 1.87/1.11  ------ Parsing...
% 1.87/1.11  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 1.87/1.11  
% 1.87/1.11  ------ Preprocessing...
% 1.87/1.11  
% 1.87/1.11  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.87/1.11  
% 1.87/1.11  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.87/1.11  
% 1.87/1.11  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------