TSTP Solution File: CSR050+4 by E---3.2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.2.0
% Problem : CSR050+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 05:04:06 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 13.69s 14.15s
% Output : CNFRefutation 13.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 29 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 47 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 31 ( 13 ~; 10 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query200,conjecture,
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32))
=> tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.DTJ1UOqSyU/E---3.1_20477.p',query200) ).
fof(ax3_44208,axiom,
! [X22,X23] :
( ( mtvisible(X22)
& genlmt(X22,X23) )
=> mtvisible(X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.DTJ1UOqSyU/E---3.1_20477.p',ax3_44208) ).
fof(ax3_13706,axiom,
genlmt(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32),c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.DTJ1UOqSyU/E---3.1_20477.p',ax3_13706) ).
fof(ax3_18486,axiom,
genlmt(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt,c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.DTJ1UOqSyU/E---3.1_20477.p',ax3_18486) ).
fof(ax3_1228,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
=> tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.DTJ1UOqSyU/E---3.1_20477.p',ax3_1228) ).
fof(ax3_5459,axiom,
genlmt(c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt,c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.DTJ1UOqSyU/E---3.1_20477.p',ax3_5459) ).
fof(ax3_825,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_9_693(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_8_692(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.DTJ1UOqSyU/E---3.1_20477.p',ax3_825) ).
fof(ax3_3382,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_8_692(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_7_691(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.DTJ1UOqSyU/E---3.1_20477.p',ax3_3382) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32))
=> tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query200]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X38,X39] :
( ~ mtvisible(X38)
| ~ genlmt(X38,X39)
| mtvisible(X39) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_44208])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32))
& ~ tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( mtvisible(X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
genlmt(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32),c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_13706]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
genlmt(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt,c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_18486]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
mtvisible(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
| tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_1228])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
genlmt(c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt,c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_5459]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
mtvisible(c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X40,X41] :
( ~ tptptypes_9_693(X40,X41)
| tptptypes_8_692(X40,X41) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_825])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939)
| ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
! [X24,X25] :
( ~ tptptypes_8_692(X24,X25)
| tptptypes_7_691(X25,X24) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_3382])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( tptptypes_8_692(X1,X2)
| ~ tptptypes_9_693(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( tptptypes_7_691(X2,X1)
| ~ tptptypes_8_692(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
tptptypes_8_692(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR050+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 20 01:16:54 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 13.24/13.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 13.24/13.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.DTJ1UOqSyU/E---3.1_20477.p
% 13.69/14.15 # Version: 3.2.0
% 13.69/14.15 # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 13.69/14.15 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 13.69/14.15 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 13.69/14.15 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 13.69/14.15 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 13.69/14.15 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 13.69/14.15 # new_bool_1 with pid 20557 completed with status 0
% 13.69/14.15 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 13.69/14.15 # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 13.69/14.15 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 13.69/14.15 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 13.69/14.15 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 13.69/14.15 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 13.69/14.15 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 13.69/14.15 # Search class: FHHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 13.69/14.15 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 13.69/14.15 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 13.69/14.15 # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 23s (1) cores
% 13.69/14.15 # G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with pid 20560 completed with status 0
% 13.69/14.15 # Result found by G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S
% 13.69/14.15 # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 13.69/14.15 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 13.69/14.15 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 13.69/14.15 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 13.69/14.15 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 13.69/14.15 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 13.69/14.15 # Search class: FHHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 13.69/14.15 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 13.69/14.15 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 13.69/14.15 # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 23s (1) cores
% 13.69/14.15 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 13.69/14.15 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 13.69/14.15
% 13.69/14.15 # Proof found!
% 13.69/14.15 # SZS status Theorem
% 13.69/14.15 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 13.69/14.15 # Parsed axioms : 44217
% 13.69/14.15 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 44123
% 13.69/14.15 # Initial clauses : 95
% 13.69/14.15 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 13.69/14.15 # Initial clauses in saturation : 94
% 13.69/14.15 # Processed clauses : 182
% 13.69/14.15 # ...of these trivial : 7
% 13.69/14.15 # ...subsumed : 14
% 13.69/14.15 # ...remaining for further processing : 161
% 13.69/14.15 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 13.69/14.15 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 13.69/14.15 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 13.69/14.15 # Backward-rewritten : 4
% 13.69/14.15 # Generated clauses : 78
% 13.69/14.15 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 57
% 13.69/14.15 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 13.69/14.15 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 13.69/14.15 # Paramodulations : 76
% 13.69/14.15 # Factorizations : 0
% 13.69/14.15 # NegExts : 0
% 13.69/14.15 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 13.69/14.15 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 13.69/14.15 # Total rewrite steps : 32
% 13.69/14.15 # ...of those cached : 22
% 13.69/14.15 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 13.69/14.15 # Propositional check models : 0
% 13.69/14.15 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 13.69/14.15 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 13.69/14.15 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 13.69/14.15 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 13.69/14.15 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 13.69/14.15 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 13.69/14.15 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 13.69/14.15 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 13.69/14.15 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 13.69/14.15 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 13.69/14.15 # Current number of processed clauses : 81
% 13.69/14.15 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 60
% 13.69/14.15 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 13.69/14.15 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 13.69/14.15 # Non-unit-clauses : 20
% 13.69/14.15 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 42
% 13.69/14.15 # ...number of literals in the above : 83
% 13.69/14.15 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 13.69/14.15 # Current number of archived clauses : 78
% 13.69/14.15 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 386
% 13.69/14.15 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 314
% 13.69/14.15 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 14
% 13.69/14.15 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 13.69/14.15 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 13.69/14.15 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 13.69/14.15 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 13.69/14.15 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 13.69/14.15 # Condensation successes : 0
% 13.69/14.15 # Termbank termtop insertions : 296084
% 13.69/14.15 # Search garbage collected termcells : 157722
% 13.69/14.15
% 13.69/14.15 # -------------------------------------------------
% 13.69/14.15 # User time : 0.171 s
% 13.69/14.15 # System time : 0.071 s
% 13.69/14.15 # Total time : 0.242 s
% 13.69/14.15 # Maximum resident set size: 81752 pages
% 13.69/14.15
% 13.69/14.15 # -------------------------------------------------
% 13.69/14.15 # User time : 0.578 s
% 13.69/14.15 # System time : 0.104 s
% 13.69/14.15 # Total time : 0.682 s
% 13.69/14.15 # Maximum resident set size: 34592 pages
% 13.69/14.15 % E---3.1 exiting
% 13.69/14.15 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------