TSTP Solution File: CSR048+2 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : CSR048+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 07:35:26 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.57s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   27 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   22 (  10   ~;   6   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   1 sgn   5   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query98,conjecture,
    ? [X6] :
      ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
     => borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X6) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pdbpeD5GIN/E---3.1_31435.p',query98) ).

fof(ax1_207,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
   => borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pdbpeD5GIN/E---3.1_31435.p',ax1_207) ).

fof(ax1_1123,axiom,
    ! [X20,X21] :
      ( ( mtvisible(X20)
        & genlmt(X20,X21) )
     => mtvisible(X21) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pdbpeD5GIN/E---3.1_31435.p',ax1_1123) ).

fof(ax1_140,axiom,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pdbpeD5GIN/E---3.1_31435.p',ax1_140) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X6] :
        ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
       => borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X6) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query98]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
    | borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_207])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X22] :
      ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
      & ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X22) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X30,X31] :
      ( ~ mtvisible(X30)
      | ~ genlmt(X30,X31)
      | mtvisible(X31) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_1123])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ genlmt(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_140]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),c_0_13]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : CSR048+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 14:26:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.52  Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pdbpeD5GIN/E---3.1_31435.p
% 0.20/0.57  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.57  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.57  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.57  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.20/0.57  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.20/0.57  # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.20/0.57  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.57  # sh5l with pid 31515 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.57  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.20/0.57  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.57  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.57  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.20/0.57  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.20/0.57  # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.20/0.57  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.57  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.57  # Search class: FHHNF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.57  # partial match(1): FHHNF-FFMM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.57  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.57  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.57  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 31520 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.57  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.20/0.57  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.57  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.57  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.20/0.57  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.20/0.57  # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.20/0.57  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.57  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.57  # Search class: FHHNF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.57  # partial match(1): FHHNF-FFMM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.57  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.57  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.57  # Preprocessing time       : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.57  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.57  
% 0.20/0.57  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.57  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.57  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.57  # Parsed axioms                        : 1132
% 0.20/0.57  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1046
% 0.20/0.57  # Initial clauses                      : 87
% 0.20/0.57  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.57  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 87
% 0.20/0.57  # Processed clauses                    : 136
% 0.20/0.57  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.20/0.57  # ...subsumed                          : 4
% 0.20/0.57  # ...remaining for further processing  : 132
% 0.20/0.57  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.57  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.57  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.20/0.57  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.20/0.57  # Generated clauses                    : 20
% 0.20/0.57  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 11
% 0.20/0.57  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.57  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.57  # Paramodulations                      : 20
% 0.20/0.57  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.57  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.57  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.20/0.57  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.20/0.57  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 0.20/0.57  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.20/0.57  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.57  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.57  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.57  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.57  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.57  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.57  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.57  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.57  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.57  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.57  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.57  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.57  # Current number of processed clauses  : 49
% 0.20/0.57  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 16
% 0.20/0.57  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.57  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.20/0.57  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 30
% 0.20/0.57  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 44
% 0.20/0.57  # ...number of literals in the above   : 98
% 0.20/0.57  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.57  # Current number of archived clauses   : 83
% 0.20/0.57  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1258
% 0.20/0.57  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1133
% 0.20/0.57  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.20/0.57  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.20/0.57  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.57  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.20/0.57  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.20/0.57  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.57  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.57  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 11328
% 0.20/0.57  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 5027
% 0.20/0.57  
% 0.20/0.57  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.57  # User time                : 0.012 s
% 0.20/0.57  # System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.20/0.57  # Total time               : 0.021 s
% 0.20/0.57  # Maximum resident set size: 4188 pages
% 0.20/0.57  
% 0.20/0.57  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.57  # User time                : 0.028 s
% 0.20/0.57  # System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.20/0.57  # Total time               : 0.039 s
% 0.20/0.57  # Maximum resident set size: 2656 pages
% 0.20/0.57  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------