TSTP Solution File: CSR047+3 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR047+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:35:25 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.98s 1.24s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.98s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 16 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn 4 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query147,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cE2j6nID2O/E---3.1_17126.p',query147) ).
fof(ax2_1237,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cE2j6nID2O/E---3.1_17126.p',ax2_1237) ).
fof(ax2_7642,axiom,
! [X15,X16] :
( borderson(X15,X16)
=> borderson(X16,X15) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cE2j6nID2O/E---3.1_17126.p',ax2_7642) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query147]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1237])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
& ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X27,X28] :
( ~ borderson(X27,X28)
| borderson(X28,X27) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7642])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( borderson(X2,X1)
| ~ borderson(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : CSR047+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 3 15:18:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.91/1.13 Running first-order model finding
% 0.91/1.13 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cE2j6nID2O/E---3.1_17126.p
% 0.98/1.24 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.98/1.24 # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.98/1.24 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.98/1.24 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.98/1.24 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.98/1.24 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.98/1.24 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.98/1.24 # new_bool_3 with pid 17446 completed with status 0
% 0.98/1.24 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.98/1.24 # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.98/1.24 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.98/1.24 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.98/1.24 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.98/1.24 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.98/1.24 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.98/1.24 # partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.98/1.24 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.98/1.24 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.98/1.24 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 17449 completed with status 0
% 0.98/1.24 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.98/1.24 # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.98/1.24 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.98/1.24 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.98/1.24 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.98/1.24 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.98/1.24 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.98/1.24 # partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.98/1.24 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.98/1.24 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.98/1.24 # Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.98/1.24 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.98/1.24
% 0.98/1.24 # Proof found!
% 0.98/1.24 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.98/1.24 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.98/1.24 # Parsed axioms : 8006
% 0.98/1.24 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7960
% 0.98/1.24 # Initial clauses : 47
% 0.98/1.24 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.98/1.24 # Initial clauses in saturation : 47
% 0.98/1.24 # Processed clauses : 85
% 0.98/1.24 # ...of these trivial : 7
% 0.98/1.24 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.98/1.24 # ...remaining for further processing : 77
% 0.98/1.24 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.98/1.24 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.98/1.24 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.98/1.24 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.98/1.24 # Generated clauses : 7
% 0.98/1.24 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.98/1.24 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.98/1.24 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.98/1.24 # Paramodulations : 7
% 0.98/1.24 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.98/1.24 # NegExts : 0
% 0.98/1.24 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.98/1.24 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.98/1.24 # Total rewrite steps : 9
% 0.98/1.24 # ...of those cached : 1
% 0.98/1.24 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.98/1.24 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.98/1.24 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.98/1.24 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.98/1.24 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.98/1.24 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.98/1.24 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.98/1.24 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.98/1.24 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.98/1.24 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.98/1.24 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.98/1.24 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.98/1.24 # Current number of processed clauses : 38
% 0.98/1.24 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 23
% 0.98/1.24 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.98/1.24 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.98/1.24 # Non-unit-clauses : 13
% 0.98/1.24 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3
% 0.98/1.24 # ...number of literals in the above : 9
% 0.98/1.24 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.98/1.24 # Current number of archived clauses : 39
% 0.98/1.24 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 41
% 0.98/1.24 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 31
% 0.98/1.24 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.98/1.24 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.98/1.24 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.98/1.24 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.98/1.24 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.98/1.24 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.98/1.24 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.98/1.24 # Termbank termtop insertions : 52395
% 0.98/1.24 # Search garbage collected termcells : 31072
% 0.98/1.24
% 0.98/1.24 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.98/1.24 # User time : 0.034 s
% 0.98/1.24 # System time : 0.017 s
% 0.98/1.24 # Total time : 0.051 s
% 0.98/1.24 # Maximum resident set size: 18208 pages
% 0.98/1.24
% 0.98/1.24 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.98/1.24 # User time : 0.081 s
% 0.98/1.24 # System time : 0.023 s
% 0.98/1.24 # Total time : 0.104 s
% 0.98/1.24 # Maximum resident set size: 8064 pages
% 0.98/1.24 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------