TSTP Solution File: CSR046+1 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : CSR046+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 21:36:46 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 6.02s 1.58s
% Output : Proof 9.54s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : CSR046+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 08:32:42 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.62 ________ _____
% 0.20/0.62 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.20/0.62 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.20/0.62 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.20/0.62 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.20/0.62 (2023-06-19)
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.20/0.62 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.20/0.62 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.20/0.62 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.20/0.63 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.20/0.64 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.20/0.64 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.20/0.64 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.20/0.64 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.20/0.64 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.20/0.64 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.20/0.64 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 3.16/1.13 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 3.16/1.13 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 3.16/1.18 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 3.16/1.18 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 3.16/1.18 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.16/1.18 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 3.16/1.18 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 5.95/1.53 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.02/1.57 Prover 5: proved (931ms)
% 6.02/1.58
% 6.02/1.58 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.02/1.58
% 6.02/1.59 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 6.62/1.64 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 6.62/1.64 Prover 2: Proving ...
% 6.62/1.65 Prover 2: stopped
% 6.62/1.65 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 7.12/1.70 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.12/1.71 Prover 6: stopped
% 7.12/1.72 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 7.12/1.73 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 7.12/1.74 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.12/1.75 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.12/1.75 Prover 3: stopped
% 7.78/1.77 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 7.89/1.80 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.15/1.82 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 8.15/1.83 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 8.23/1.85 Prover 0: Proving ...
% 8.23/1.85 Prover 0: stopped
% 8.23/1.86 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 8.23/1.90 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.23/1.90 Prover 7: Found proof (size 6)
% 8.23/1.90 Prover 7: proved (310ms)
% 8.23/1.90 Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 8.23/1.91 Prover 1: stopped
% 8.23/1.92 Prover 11: stopped
% 8.23/1.92 Prover 4: stopped
% 8.23/1.95 Prover 13: stopped
% 8.23/1.95 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.23/1.96 Prover 10: stopped
% 9.08/2.01 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 9.08/2.03 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.54/2.04 Prover 8: stopped
% 9.54/2.04
% 9.54/2.04 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.54/2.04
% 9.54/2.04 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 9.54/2.05 Assumptions after simplification:
% 9.54/2.05 ---------------------------------
% 9.54/2.05
% 9.54/2.05 (just7)
% 9.54/2.05 $i(c_tptpcol_15_50957) & $i(c_tptpcol_16_50958) & genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958,
% 9.54/2.05 c_tptpcol_15_50957)
% 9.54/2.05
% 9.54/2.06 (query46)
% 9.54/2.08 $i(c_tptpcol_15_50957) & $i(c_tptpcol_16_50958) & $i(c_translation_0_885) &
% 9.54/2.08 $i(s_http_wwwfuntriviacomplayquizcfmqid60926origin) & ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1:
% 9.54/2.08 $i] : ? [v2: $i] :
% 9.54/2.08 (f_urlfn(s_http_wwwfuntriviacomplayquizcfmqid60926origin) = v0 &
% 9.54/2.08 f_urlreferentfn(v0) = v1 & f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(v1,
% 9.54/2.08 c_translation_0_885) = v2 & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & mtvisible(v2) & ~
% 9.54/2.08 genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958, c_tptpcol_15_50957))
% 9.54/2.08
% 9.54/2.08 Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 9.54/2.08 --------------------------------------------
% 9.54/2.08 just1, just10, just11, just12, just13, just14, just15, just16, just17, just18,
% 9.54/2.08 just19, just2, just20, just21, just22, just23, just24, just25, just26, just27,
% 9.54/2.08 just28, just29, just3, just30, just31, just32, just33, just34, just35, just36,
% 9.54/2.08 just37, just38, just39, just4, just40, just41, just42, just43, just44, just45,
% 9.54/2.08 just46, just47, just48, just49, just5, just50, just51, just52, just53, just54,
% 9.54/2.08 just55, just56, just57, just58, just59, just6, just60, just61, just62, just63,
% 9.54/2.08 just64, just65, just66, just8, just9
% 9.54/2.08
% 9.54/2.08 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 9.54/2.08 ---------------------------------
% 9.54/2.08
% 9.54/2.08 Begin of proof
% 9.54/2.08 |
% 9.54/2.09 | ALPHA: (just7) implies:
% 9.54/2.09 | (1) genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958, c_tptpcol_15_50957)
% 9.54/2.09 |
% 9.54/2.09 | ALPHA: (query46) implies:
% 9.54/2.09 | (2) ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] :
% 9.54/2.09 | (f_urlfn(s_http_wwwfuntriviacomplayquizcfmqid60926origin) = v0 &
% 9.54/2.09 | f_urlreferentfn(v0) = v1 & f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(v1,
% 9.54/2.09 | c_translation_0_885) = v2 & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0) &
% 9.54/2.09 | mtvisible(v2) & ~ genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958, c_tptpcol_15_50957))
% 9.54/2.09 |
% 9.54/2.09 | DELTA: instantiating (2) with fresh symbols all_63_0, all_63_1, all_63_2
% 9.54/2.09 | gives:
% 9.54/2.09 | (3) f_urlfn(s_http_wwwfuntriviacomplayquizcfmqid60926origin) = all_63_2 &
% 9.54/2.09 | f_urlreferentfn(all_63_2) = all_63_1 &
% 9.54/2.09 | f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(all_63_1, c_translation_0_885) = all_63_0 &
% 9.54/2.09 | $i(all_63_0) & $i(all_63_1) & $i(all_63_2) & mtvisible(all_63_0) & ~
% 9.54/2.09 | genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958, c_tptpcol_15_50957)
% 9.54/2.09 |
% 9.54/2.09 | ALPHA: (3) implies:
% 9.54/2.09 | (4) ~ genls(c_tptpcol_16_50958, c_tptpcol_15_50957)
% 9.54/2.09 |
% 9.54/2.09 | PRED_UNIFY: (1), (4) imply:
% 9.54/2.09 | (5) $false
% 9.54/2.09 |
% 9.54/2.09 | CLOSE: (5) is inconsistent.
% 9.54/2.09 |
% 9.54/2.09 End of proof
% 9.54/2.09 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 9.54/2.09
% 9.54/2.09 1475ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------