TSTP Solution File: CSR045+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : CSR045+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:21:29 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.84s 1.04s
% Output : Refutation 0.84s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : CSR045+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 18:58:33 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.38 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.38 The process was started by sandbox on n026.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.38 Fri Jun 10 18:58:33 2022
% 0.14/0.38 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 15438.
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.38 set(auto).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.38 clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 formula_list(usable).
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.14/0.38 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.14/0.38 in usable.
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -isa(A,B)| -isa(A,C)| -disjointwith(B,C).
% 0.14/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlinverse(A,B)| -genlinverse(B,C)|genlpreds(A,C).
% 0.14/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -arg1isa(A,B)| -genls(B,C)|arg1isa(A,C).
% 0.14/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 13 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlpreds(A,B)|predicate(B).
% 0.14/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 14 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlpreds(A,B)|predicate(A).
% 0.14/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 16 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -predicate(A)|genlpreds(A,A).
% 0.14/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 37 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlmt(A,B)|microtheory(B).
% 0.14/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 38 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlmt(A,B)|microtheory(A).
% 0.14/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 40 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -microtheory(A)|genlmt(A,A).
% 0.14/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 45 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genls(A,B)|collection(B).
% 0.14/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genls(A,B)|collection(A).
% 0.14/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genls(A,B)|collection(A).
% 0.14/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 47 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -collection(A)|genls(A,A).
% 0.14/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 46 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genls(A,B)| -genls(C,A)|genls(C,B).
% 0.14/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 46 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genls(A,B)| -genls(B,C)|genls(A,C).
% 0.14/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 50 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -isa(A,B)|collection(B).
% 0.14/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 51 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -isa(A,B)|thing(A).
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.14/0.40 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.14/0.40 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.14/0.40 number of clauses in intial UL: 52
% 0.14/0.40 number of clauses initially in problem: 68
% 0.14/0.40 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 76
% 0.14/0.40 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 77
% 0.14/0.40 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.14/0.40 absolute distinct symbol count: 36
% 0.14/0.40 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.14/0.40 distinct function count: 0
% 0.14/0.40 distinct constant count: 16
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.84/1.04 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.84/1.04 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Model 7 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Model 8 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Model 9 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Model 10 [ 4 1 401 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Model 11 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Model 12 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Model 13 [ 1 1 363 ] (0.00 seconds, 1154 Inserts)
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Model 14 [ 1 0 299 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Model 15 [ 2 0 299 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Model 16 [ 2 0 378 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Model 17 [ 2 0 504 ] (0.00 seconds, 989 Inserts)
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Model 18 [ 4 1 359 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Model 19 [ 2 1 210 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Model 20 [ 4 0 221 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Model 21 [ 10 1 174 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 0.64 sec ----> 113 [hyper,110,6,98] {-} $F.
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Length of proof is 6. Level of proof is 5.
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.84/1.04 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.84/1.04 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 1 [] {+} -microtheory(A)|aspatialinformationstore(A).
% 0.84/1.04 2 [] {+} -intangibleindividual(A)|partiallyintangibleindividual(A).
% 0.84/1.04 3 [] {+} -aspatialinformationstore(A)|intangibleindividual(A).
% 0.84/1.04 4 [] {+} -partiallyintangibleindividual(A)|individual(A).
% 0.84/1.04 5 [] {+} -applicationcontext(A)|microtheory(A).
% 0.84/1.04 6 [] {+} -collection(A)| -individual(A).
% 0.84/1.04 9 [] {+} -genls(A,B)|collection(A).
% 0.84/1.04 53 [] {+} applicationcontext(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14).
% 0.84/1.04 68 [] {+} genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088).
% 0.84/1.04 70 [hyper,53,5] {+} microtheory(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14).
% 0.84/1.04 76 [hyper,70,1] {+} aspatialinformationstore(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14).
% 0.84/1.04 94 [hyper,76,3] {+} intangibleindividual(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14).
% 0.84/1.04 98 [hyper,68,9] {+} collection(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14).
% 0.84/1.04 100 [hyper,94,2] {+} partiallyintangibleindividual(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14).
% 0.84/1.04 110 [hyper,100,4] {+} individual(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14).
% 0.84/1.04 113 [hyper,110,6,98] {-} $F.
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.84/1.04 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 ============ end of search ============
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 true clauses given 8 (28.6%)
% 0.84/1.04 false clauses given 20
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 FALSE TRUE
% 0.84/1.04 2 3 6
% 0.84/1.04 3 10 12
% 0.84/1.04 tot: 13 18 (58.1% true)
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Model 21 [ 10 1 174 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 Process 15438 finished Fri Jun 10 18:58:34 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------