TSTP Solution File: CSR044+3 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : CSR044+3 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Dec 25 06:18:27 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 1.29s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 18
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 55 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 113 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 104 ( 46 ~; 43 |; 7 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 44 ( 0 sgn 29 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,axiom,
executionbyfiringsquad(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90),
file('/tmp/tmpI96QPt/sel_CSR044+3.p_1',ax2_19) ).
fof(4,axiom,
! [X2] :
( isa(X2,c_tptpcol_16_29490)
=> tptpcol_16_29490(X2) ),
file('/tmp/tmpI96QPt/sel_CSR044+3.p_1',ax2_5730) ).
fof(5,axiom,
! [X3,X4,X5,X6] :
( ( isa(X3,X4)
& relationallexists(X5,X4,X6) )
=> isa(f_relationallexistsfn(X3,X5,X4,X6),X6) ),
file('/tmp/tmpI96QPt/sel_CSR044+3.p_1',ax2_2981) ).
fof(14,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
=> relationallexists(c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490) ),
file('/tmp/tmpI96QPt/sel_CSR044+3.p_1',ax2_2496) ).
fof(15,axiom,
! [X3] :
( ( mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
& executionbyfiringsquad(X3) )
=> tptp_9_720(X3,f_relationallexistsfn(X3,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)) ),
file('/tmp/tmpI96QPt/sel_CSR044+3.p_1',ax2_2495) ).
fof(28,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
file('/tmp/tmpI96QPt/sel_CSR044+3.p_1',ax2_4288) ).
fof(35,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3633_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
file('/tmp/tmpI96QPt/sel_CSR044+3.p_1',ax2_142) ).
fof(40,axiom,
! [X2] :
( executionbyfiringsquad(X2)
=> isa(X2,c_executionbyfiringsquad) ),
file('/tmp/tmpI96QPt/sel_CSR044+3.p_1',ax2_7920) ).
fof(54,axiom,
! [X16,X17] :
( ( mtvisible(X16)
& genlmt(X16,X17) )
=> mtvisible(X17) ),
file('/tmp/tmpI96QPt/sel_CSR044+3.p_1',ax2_7997) ).
fof(56,conjecture,
? [X2] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3633_mt)
=> ( tptp_9_720(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,X2)
& tptpcol_16_29490(X2) ) ),
file('/tmp/tmpI96QPt/sel_CSR044+3.p_1',query144) ).
fof(57,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X2] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3633_mt)
=> ( tptp_9_720(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,X2)
& tptpcol_16_29490(X2) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[56]) ).
cnf(58,plain,
executionbyfiringsquad(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
fof(65,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ isa(X2,c_tptpcol_16_29490)
| tptpcol_16_29490(X2) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
fof(66,plain,
! [X3] :
( ~ isa(X3,c_tptpcol_16_29490)
| tptpcol_16_29490(X3) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[65]) ).
cnf(67,plain,
( tptpcol_16_29490(X1)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_29490) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[66]) ).
fof(68,plain,
! [X3,X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ isa(X3,X4)
| ~ relationallexists(X5,X4,X6)
| isa(f_relationallexistsfn(X3,X5,X4,X6),X6) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
fof(69,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9,X10] :
( ~ isa(X7,X8)
| ~ relationallexists(X9,X8,X10)
| isa(f_relationallexistsfn(X7,X9,X8,X10),X10) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[68]) ).
cnf(70,plain,
( isa(f_relationallexistsfn(X1,X2,X3,X4),X4)
| ~ relationallexists(X2,X3,X4)
| ~ isa(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[69]) ).
fof(90,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
| relationallexists(c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
cnf(91,plain,
( relationallexists(c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)
| ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[90]) ).
fof(92,plain,
! [X3] :
( ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
| ~ executionbyfiringsquad(X3)
| tptp_9_720(X3,f_relationallexistsfn(X3,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
fof(93,plain,
! [X4] :
( ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
| ~ executionbyfiringsquad(X4)
| tptp_9_720(X4,f_relationallexistsfn(X4,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[92]) ).
cnf(94,plain,
( tptp_9_720(X1,f_relationallexistsfn(X1,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490))
| ~ executionbyfiringsquad(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[93]) ).
cnf(123,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[28]) ).
cnf(141,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3633_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[35]) ).
fof(153,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ executionbyfiringsquad(X2)
| isa(X2,c_executionbyfiringsquad) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[40]) ).
fof(154,plain,
! [X3] :
( ~ executionbyfiringsquad(X3)
| isa(X3,c_executionbyfiringsquad) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[153]) ).
cnf(155,plain,
( isa(X1,c_executionbyfiringsquad)
| ~ executionbyfiringsquad(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[154]) ).
fof(190,plain,
! [X16,X17] :
( ~ mtvisible(X16)
| ~ genlmt(X16,X17)
| mtvisible(X17) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[54]) ).
fof(191,plain,
! [X18,X19] :
( ~ mtvisible(X18)
| ~ genlmt(X18,X19)
| mtvisible(X19) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[190]) ).
cnf(192,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[191]) ).
fof(194,negated_conjecture,
! [X2] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3633_mt)
& ( ~ tptp_9_720(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,X2)
| ~ tptpcol_16_29490(X2) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[57]) ).
fof(195,negated_conjecture,
! [X3] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3633_mt)
& ( ~ tptp_9_720(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,X3)
| ~ tptpcol_16_29490(X3) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[194]) ).
cnf(196,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpcol_16_29490(X1)
| ~ tptp_9_720(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[195]) ).
cnf(197,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member3633_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[195]) ).
cnf(201,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptp_9_720(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,X1)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_29490) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[196,67,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(205,plain,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member3633_mt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[192,141,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(207,plain,
( mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[192,123,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(213,plain,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[205,197,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(214,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[213,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(217,plain,
isa(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,c_executionbyfiringsquad),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[155,58,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(234,plain,
( mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[207,214,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(235,plain,
mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[234,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(236,plain,
( tptp_9_720(X1,f_relationallexistsfn(X1,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490))
| $false
| ~ executionbyfiringsquad(X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[94,235,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(237,plain,
( tptp_9_720(X1,f_relationallexistsfn(X1,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490))
| ~ executionbyfiringsquad(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[236,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(238,plain,
( relationallexists(c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[91,235,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(239,plain,
relationallexists(c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[238,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(245,negated_conjecture,
( ~ isa(f_relationallexistsfn(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490),c_tptpcol_16_29490)
| ~ executionbyfiringsquad(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[201,237,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(246,negated_conjecture,
( ~ isa(f_relationallexistsfn(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490),c_tptpcol_16_29490)
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[245,58,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(247,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(f_relationallexistsfn(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490),c_tptpcol_16_29490),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[246,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(248,negated_conjecture,
( ~ relationallexists(c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)
| ~ isa(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,c_executionbyfiringsquad) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[247,70,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(249,negated_conjecture,
( $false
| ~ isa(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,c_executionbyfiringsquad) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[248,239,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(250,negated_conjecture,
( $false
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[249,217,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(251,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[250,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(252,negated_conjecture,
$false,
251,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/CSR/CSR044+3.p
% --creating new selector for [CSR002+2.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpI96QPt/sel_CSR044+3.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem CSR044+3.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/CSR/CSR044+3.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/CSR/CSR044+3.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------